Senate grills abuse report author

Found on BBC on Monday, 10 May 2004
Browse Various

A US general who reported on abuse by US forces against detained Iraqis is being questioned by a committee of Congress investigating the scandal.

Maj Gen Antonio Taguba found "numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" in his report.

Correspondents say it has grown ever more embarrassing for George W Bush ahead of the US presidential election later this year and appears to be having a severe effect on the American public's view of the entire Iraq war.

Gen Taguba's report says detainees at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison were forced to commit sexual acts, were threatened with torture, rape or attack by dogs, and were hidden from Red Cross visits, "in violation of international law".

The investigation was completed on 3 March, the Pentagon said, but by 4 May the defence secretary had still not read it fully.

The report was originally kept secret but later leaked to the media.

If this material wouldn't have leaked, the report would have simply vanished. How good it is to know that the US, our big freedom-bringing brother, has put an end to all the torture, rape and power abuse. How refreshing it is to see that reports of extreme abuses are released almost instantly to the public, not fearing the political impact. How perfect they handle a war which luckily stopped Iraqs world-threatening terror regime and the countless WMDs it had...

Update: BBC decided to change the headline to "Commanders blamed for Iraq abuses" and rewrite parts of the article.

Companies 'ignore email complaints'

Found on ZD Net on Thursday, 06 May 2004
Browse Various

Australian research suggests that about half of complaints emailed to companies fail to be addressed

Melbourne-based online benchmarking company Global Reviews found during a recent research exercise that 50 percent of complaints that it sent to companies via email were "either not addressed or ignored altogether".

In contrast, Global Reviews director, Adir Shiffman, said that businesses were very efficient when it came to handling sales enquiries over the same contact medium.

Schiffman conceded that while the research finding may only have confirmed what many consumers might have expected intuitively, however, he said the inconsistency was noteworthy.

That isn't very surprising at all. Some companies seem only to be interested in sales, not in keeping customers. One lied to me so obviously, claiming their software cannot transfer money back, that I wonder what they think about the intelligence of their customers. There's only one thing to do: never buy there again and tell your friends about it. Of course, let the company know about that too.

Music Labels Still Don't Get It

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 03 May 2004
Browse Various

Last month we wrote about how the music industry was, inexplicably, looking to (a) raise prices on digital downloads and (b) force people to buy a bad song to get a good song. They clearly have no clue that they're basically killing the one, very minor, success they've had in the world of digital downloads. Now, even folks in mainstream magazines like Newsweek are screaming about how the labels just don't get it. Steven Levy takes a look at a number of downloadable albums that cost more than their CDs, while giving the user less (one of the CDs comes with a DVD as well). He also can't believe that the industry hasn't pushed to make downloadable songs play on a variety of devices, as that would encourage more people to buy. However, the folks who run the labels don't get it. They only look at digital downloads and see piracy. They are blind to the idea that it might be an opportunity, and thus they have no real reason to come up with reasons to encourage it. Of course, all this really does is push end-users to seek less than legal alternatives.

That article brings it down to the point. Nothing more to add.

Entertainment Industry Continues Teaching

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 25 April 2004
Browse Various

You may remember that last fall the entertainment industry began a project where they went into schools to teach a "lesson" on why file sharing was bad that included the lesson, "if you didn't pay for it, you stole it." Of course, to hammer this lesson home, the industry gave away for free DVD players and trips to Hollywood to those students who could come up with the best essays to express why anything free must be stolen (sort out the irony for yourself).

Who allows the music industry to brainwash children? LEtting them present a totally one-sided view is not teaching, but controlling. They could also allow dealers to teach them why drugs are good for you. Or leaders from the KKK could tell the kids why they are on top of the evolution (that's scarcasm, for those who don't realize that).

Projectionists Using Night Vision Goggles

Found on Slashdot on Thursday, 15 April 2004
Browse Various

"Los Angeles police arrested Ruben Centero Moreno, 34, after the projectionist used night vision goggles to spot his video camera in a showing of The Alamo. He has been charged under the new California anti-camcorder law, and could face up to 1 year in jail if convicted. The BBC reports that 'The MPAA has established a nationwide telephone hotline for cinema employees to report violations, and studios and cinemas are also investing in metal detectors and night-vision goggles'. Motion Picture Ass. Head Jack Valenti said he hoped it would 'send a clear signal such crimes will not be tolerated'. Clearly, the 'War on Copyright Violation' is following the successful strategy used for the War on Drugs, with significant resources of technology and police time mobilised to send violators to jail for a long time. Soon, copied films will be as rare as students lighting up a joint after their exams."

The lesson is clear: stay out of movie theaters and you won't get arrested.

Obviously, the MPAA likes to harass people, just like the RIAA. The law itself is questionable in my eyes: you are allowed to record radio and TV for private usage, but it's not allowed to the the same in theaters. It also needs to be mentioned that the quality of a screener is far from DVD releases. Copies will always be available, no matter that they try. For now, just don't go to theaters (I bet they will blame losses on piracy).

Gator mutation Claria files for IPO

Found on ZD Net on Friday, 09 April 2004
Browse Various

Advertising software company Claria, formerly known as Gator, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday to go public, in a sign of further momentum for Internet IPOs.

Claria, whose advertising platform (or adware) has come under legal fire from multiple Web site operators, filed an S-1 document with the SEC, seeking to raise an unspecified sum through an initial public offering. According to its filing, the company said it had a net income of about $35 million on revenue of $90 million in 2003.

Claria said that it has 43 million people active on its ad network. The company has eight offices in the United States and Europe.

Claria is fighting many battles in court over its practices.

For example, a European court recently issued a preliminary injunction against Claria that prohibits the company's pop-up and pop-under ads from appearing over German rental car Web site Hertz Autovermietung without the agency's permission.

New name, same company. Claria will quickly have its old Gator reputation back if they don't change their business modell drastically. Spyware/Adware doesn't change, no matter what label you slap on it.

US fingerprints 'allied' visitors

Found on BBC on Friday, 02 April 2004
Browse Various

A US requirement for visitors to be fingerprinted and photographed is being expanded to include citizens from America's closest allies.

The move will affect visitors from 27 countries - including the UK, Japan and Australia - whose nationals are able to visit the US without a visa.

The US-Visit (US Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology) security system is meant to identify travellers who have violated immigration controls, have criminal records or belong to groups listed as terrorist organisations by the US.

Citizens from the 27 countries will still be allowed to visit the US without a visa, although they will now have to be fingerprinted and photographed before they enter.

Asked whether the data on visitors would be kept, Mr Hutchinson said it would - in part to "facilitate travel" for frequent visitors to the US.

I don't like being treated like a criminal when crossing a border. The solution to this problem is rather simple: I will never enter US territory. Perhaps it will change when they get rid of that ridiculous amount of paranoia and self isolation.

America's Flimsy Fortress

Found on Wired on Monday, 08 March 2004
Browse Various

Terrorist attacks are very rare. So rare, in fact, that the odds of being the victim of one in an industrialized country are almost nonexistent. And most attacks affect only a few people. The events of September 11 were a statistical anomaly. Even counting the toll they took, 2,978 people in the US died from terrorism in 2001. That same year, 157,400 Americans died of lung cancer, 42,116 in road accidents, and 3,454 from malnutrition.

Even defending against a specific threat is very difficult. Security is only as strong as its weakest link; three locks on the front door do little good if the back door is open. Likewise, the air transportation system is only as secure as the country's most insecure airport, because once someone passes through security at one location, they don't have to do so at another.

Many of the security measures we encounter on a daily basis aim pinpoint the bad guys by treating everyone as a suspect. The Department of Homeland Security counts on technology to come to our rescue: databases to track suspected terrorists, facial recognition to spot them in airports, artificial intelligence to anticipate plots before they unfold. But that creates a problem similar to the one you see when airport security screeners waste their time frisking false alarms. Terrorists are so rare that any individual lead is almost certainly a false one. So billions of dollars are wasted with no assurance that any terrorist will be caught. When an airport screener confiscates a pocketknife from an innocent person, security has failed.

The problem is that it is getting more and more common to treat everybody as a potential suspect. Technology is an important factor, but relying on it to protect youself from terrorists is the wrong approach. Humans do not fit into a database scheme.

Rights issue 'delays Hobbit film'

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 06 March 2004
Browse Various

Oscar-winning director Peter Jackson cannot film The Hobbit until legal problems are resolved between two movie studios, he said.

Jackson said that while New Line Cinema owns the rights to make the Lord of the Rings prequel, MGM has the rights to distribute it.

"Their lawyers are going to have a huge amount of fun over the next few years trying to work it all out," he said.

Jackson added that if he directed the Hobbit, he would like it to fit in with his Lord of the Rings film trilogy.

"I'd want Ian McKellen to be back as Gandalf, I'd want it to feel like it was part of the same mythology that we've done with Lord of the Rings."

I hope they find a solution and produce "The Hobbit"; of course with the same actors as in "Lord of the Rings". Too bad Tolkien's main works aren't equally famous. The movies could be an even bigger epos if all stories about "Middle Earth" made their way to cinemas in the chronological order. Who knows, maybe we'll see "The Silmarillion" too one day.

Proposed legislation to toughen penalties

Found on CBC News on Friday, 27 February 2004
Browse Various

OTTAWA - People caught illegally buying foreign satellite television service could face stiffer penalties if proposed legislation is passed.

Bill C-2, an amendment to the Radiocommunication Act, would increase penalties on individuals from maximum fines of $10,000 and six months in prison to $25,000 and a year in prison.

Critics of the legislation say the bill makes no distinction between people who take Canadian satellite signals without paying and those who pay U.S. providers for channels the Canadian industry isn't willing to offer.

Most of the channels involved offer programming in foreign languages such as Russian, Arabic or Spanish. Canadian providers say the Canadian market is too small to make it worth their while to offer a wide selection of these channels.

Fitzgerald says the government is selling out Canadians' freedom of choice and freedom of expression, in order to please an industry lobby that has recently donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Liberal Party of Canada.

Isn't that a drastic violation of freedom of speech? You risk ending up in jail only for watching foreign TV channels? If the industry complains about losses, it should think about the reason and try harder; you cannot simply increase your earnings by law. Besides, who would watch crappy TV channels just because he is not allowed to watch the better ones?