Hacking Vodka

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 19 November 2004
Browse Various

A group of geeks aimed to find out whether running cheap vodka through a brita water filter would make it drinkable. They claim after several passes through the filter the cheap vodka surpassed the premium Ketel One in drinkability tests. I think they should have done the test 'double blind' although drinking Vladmir Vodka probably could make you go blind anyways... =)

This is one of the greatest scientific experiments recently. The sales of Brita filters will skyrocket. One of the best comments on their site was "Tessa (my cat) licked the glass, and didn't die".

Ballmer: On the Linux Hot Seat (Again)

Found on Microsoft Watch on Thursday, 18 November 2004
Browse Software

What, exactly, did Microsoft's CEO say about Linux and patents? Here's the transcript.

Let me talk a little bit about that. First, I think the most important -- if I was to leave you with one sort of top level, most important suggestion, is we recommend to all governments that they not get emotionally involved in preferring either software that comes from commercial companies or open source software.

We do license our source code to governments. Governments can look at that source code, see that source code. We actually think our software is far more secure than open source software. It is more secure because we stand behind it, because we fix it, because you actually know who builds it. Nobody ever knows who builds a piece of open source software, where it comes from, who did it.

Second, for any piece of software, the overall cost of having it, the acquisition costs of the license is generally a very small percentage. You have to buy the software, you've got to install it, you've got to deploy it, you've got to develop for it, you've got to manage it, you've got to create and buy applications from it, and all of those costs are probably about 90 percent of the total cost, the acquisition price is probably about 10 percent of the overall cost.

First of all, it looks like Linux is the sympathy winner; there's no other reason why Steve thinks that governments should not rely on emotions. Next thing: I don't know open source developers or MS developers. Knowing them doesn't really make a source code safer, so I'd still have to check it. So it doesn't really matter who wrote it. And last but not least: according to him, every solution, no matter if it's OS or MS, costs money. Fair enough. But if the costs for licensing MS products are 10%, I still can save that. Governments usually invest millions in software; 10% is quite an amount. Nice try, Steve, but I think you supported Linux with that speech!

Ballmer Threatens Linux Patent Lawsuits

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 17 November 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

"Today Microsoft warned several Asian countries that using Linux could subject them to lawsuits, claiming that Linux violates '228 patents'. Apparently, Steve Ballmer believes he can enforce U.S. law in Asia." Ballmer is presumably speaking about this story. So, companies which sell insurance against lawsuits and companies which make competing products both warn of the dangers of using Linux. Maybe someone should point out that Microsoft is battling dozens of patent-infringement lawsuits itself, and any user of Microsoft software (including governments) could also be sued?

Where do you want to get sued today? Strong words from a company who used cracked software itself; which is just a little worse than those "patent" claims. Besides, how serious can patents be taken? MS is known to patent everything it sees and hears, even if the "invention" has been used years (or even decades) before by others. MS just had the idea to patent it and sue others; I wouldn't say that's what patents are for.

Should Canada Indict Bush?

Found on Common Dreams on Tuesday, 16 November 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

When U.S. President George W. Bush arrives in Ottawa — probably later this year — should he be welcomed? Or should he be charged with war crimes?

The mistreatment of prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison is a clear contravention of the Geneva Accord. The U.S. is also deporting selected prisoners to camps outside of Iraq (another contravention). U.S. press reports also talk of shadowy prisons in Jordan run by the CIA, where suspects are routinely tortured. And the estimated civilian death toll of 100,000 may well contravene the Geneva Accords prohibition against the use of excessive force.

Then there is Guantanamo Bay. The U.S. says detainees there do not fall under the Geneva accords. That's an old argument.

In 1946, Japanese defendants explained their mistreatment of prisoners of war by noting that their country had never signed any of the Geneva Conventions. The Japanese were convicted anyway.

But a Canadian war crimes charge, too, would face many hurdles. Bush was furious last year when Belgians launched a war crimes suit in their country against him — so furious that Belgium not only backed down under U.S. threats but changed its law to prevent further recurrences.

Now wouldn't that be sweet? That would solve two problems: it would bring Dubya to justice for his oil war and effectively remove him from the White House, making room for John Kerry (who should be there now anyway). Besides, since when does fury exclude someone from a war crimes trial? I'd assume most war criminals are furious. Granted, it's harder if the criminal is still in charge, but that shouldn't influence justice.

MPAA wants parents, teachers to rat on kids

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 16 November 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

Conservatives often accuse Hollywood of failing to pay heed to 'family values', but the Motion Picture Ass. of America's latest initiative is designed to split families right down the middle. The MPAA hopes that new software will encourage parents to turn their children over to the authorities as file-sharing felons.

The software, designed to identify potentially infringing material on the home PC, is part of the MPAA's war on file sharing and will be released for free by the MPAA at a later date. As expected, the MPAA filed its first John Doe suits against file sharers today.

But by hoping that anxious parents will install the software themselves, thus giving consent, the MPAA can get round its most pressing problem: that it doesn't really know who the infringers are. In every home, the MPAA hopes, is an informer: an anxious parent.

This is a pretty well known approach to catch subversive elements under a fascist regime. Does the movie industry really think it can find a lot of sharers this way? Even more interesting: if the kids are too young to be sued, doesn't this mean that their parents (who reported them) get sued instead?

How scammers run rings round eBay

Found on The Register on Monday, 15 November 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

Everyone knows that buying and selling on eBay is precarious. Even eBay admits this and gives basic advice on its site that it believes helps eliminate most fraud.

Buyers and sellers agree not to go through the more secure PayPal system because it costs more to do so. So buyers take the risk of sending the money to the seller who either doesn't send the goods or sends shoddy or fake goods. The sellers protect themselves against prosecution by claiming loss, or disputing the buyer's version of events. The amounts involved - though not insignificant to the buyer - are too small for eBay to want to take the matter further.

There is one other common factor in all these stories. Though the buyers report the matter to eBay they are invariably frustrated at standard email responses and being steered towards a mediation system which costs the buyer £15 and even then may or may not lead to resolution. Alternatively, sellers can claim compensation through eBay and may get a maximum of £105 - if they claim between 30 and 90 days after the event and meet the criteria for payment.

I wouldn't buy anything above $50 there (even for bargains I check the seller's feedback). Ebay itself doesn't do much to improve its service. They allow multipe accounts, snipers and cancelling an auction (and we all know it's not really an auction anyway) one minute before it ends. And it would be easy to fix all this: address verification, random text graphics (like for those free email accounts to prevent auto-creation) and a cancellation time. It's no fun to be beaten by two snipers, who raise the price from $5 to $80 in the last minute; or be the only bidder at $1, and the seller cancels just one minute too early.

Sun stares down Red Hat with Solaris 10

Found on The Register on Sunday, 14 November 2004
Browse Software

That appears to be the flag Sun Microsystems will be waving today as it officially unveils Solaris 10 (even though the OS won't actually ship until January). Sun is eliminating the fee customers have paid in the past to run Solaris x86 on Intel or AMD servers in a bid to make its software model more like that of Red Hat. In so doing, the Unix server maker hopes to regain ground lost as customers flocked to Linux boxes in the post-bubble era.

Sun manages to garner a lot of attention for new versions of Solaris and is hoping that some of those folks that went with Linux will be tempted to give Solaris another try. This mid-tier pricing model gives Intel and AMD server customers a chance to test Solaris for free.

I think I'll give Solaris a try. Being around for so long, it surely can be considered stable and reliable. I don't know if I'd switch from Linux to Solaris, since this would depend a lot from the required 3rd party software.

Airlines Ordered to Expose Data

Found on Wired on Saturday, 13 November 2004
Browse Various

Homeland security officials accidentally revealed on Friday that the Transportation Security Administration will soon officially order America's airlines to turn over a month of passenger data to test a new passenger screening system.

The TSA announced in late September its intention to order all 72 domestic airlines to turn over the passenger records -- which can include credit card numbers, phone numbers, addresses and health conditions -- in order to stress-test a centralized passenger screening system called "Secure Flight."

"Our concern is understandable: Airlines cannot be subject to the potentially conflicting demands of TSA's Secure Flight test program and European (or other nations') data protection requirements," wrote ATA Deputy General Counsel James L. Casey.

"TSA is aware of, and sensitive to, the need to preserve Americans' freedom while pursuing better security," the agency wrote.

Witness the creation of the transparent civilian: collect all info to control every single step. Besides, how should this project provide a better security if the US is not allowed to use data from non-US passengers? Either all the security problems arise from US citizens, or they will ignore the laws of other countries (which is a bad idea).

How to smash a home computer

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 13 November 2004
Browse Hardware

An executive who froze his broken hard disk thinking it would be fixed has topped a list of the weirdest computer mishaps.

Careless - and preventable - mistakes that result in data loss range from reckless file maintenance practices to episodes of pure rage towards a computer.

"Data can disappear as a result of natural disaster, system fault or computer virus, but human error, including 'computer rage', seems to be a growing problem," said Adrian Palmer, managing director of Ontrack Data Recovery.

"However, individuals and companies can avoid the hassle and stress this can cause by backing up data on a regular basis."

As odd as it may sound, but freezing a harddrive did work for me. One of the drives in a FTP server failed and you could even hear the mechanics. Since there was nothing more to lose, I froze the drive and connected it to another PC. This had to be repeated several times because the drive warms up during use, but I was able to recover all data. At room temperature, this drive wasn't accessible.

Man bites dog (and a policeman)

Found on BBC News on Friday, 12 November 2004
Browse Pranks

Police say an officer and his dog were bitten by a man resisting arrest in Kansas City.

Officer David Magruder tried to arrest the man, suspected of dodging a cab fare, early on Friday morning.

The man began to punch Mr Magruder, who then released police dog "Soty" from the patrol vehicle using a remote control, a local newspaper reported.

Soty bit the man, who then bit back, according to police, nearly taking off the dog's ear. He also bit Mr Magruder.

The dog's ear had to be stitched back on by a vet, but he has lost a small piece, according to the Kansas City Star newspaper, which carried the story.

When you're in Rome, bite as the Romans do.