Should Canada Indict Bush?

Found on Common Dreams on Tuesday, 16 November 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

When U.S. President George W. Bush arrives in Ottawa — probably later this year — should he be welcomed? Or should he be charged with war crimes?

The mistreatment of prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison is a clear contravention of the Geneva Accord. The U.S. is also deporting selected prisoners to camps outside of Iraq (another contravention). U.S. press reports also talk of shadowy prisons in Jordan run by the CIA, where suspects are routinely tortured. And the estimated civilian death toll of 100,000 may well contravene the Geneva Accords prohibition against the use of excessive force.

Then there is Guantanamo Bay. The U.S. says detainees there do not fall under the Geneva accords. That's an old argument.

In 1946, Japanese defendants explained their mistreatment of prisoners of war by noting that their country had never signed any of the Geneva Conventions. The Japanese were convicted anyway.

But a Canadian war crimes charge, too, would face many hurdles. Bush was furious last year when Belgians launched a war crimes suit in their country against him — so furious that Belgium not only backed down under U.S. threats but changed its law to prevent further recurrences.

Now wouldn't that be sweet? That would solve two problems: it would bring Dubya to justice for his oil war and effectively remove him from the White House, making room for John Kerry (who should be there now anyway). Besides, since when does fury exclude someone from a war crimes trial? I'd assume most war criminals are furious. Granted, it's harder if the criminal is still in charge, but that shouldn't influence justice.