Structure produces world's fastest transistor

Found on PhysOrg on Monday, 11 April 2005
Browse Technology

A new type of transistor structure, invented by scientists at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has broken the 600 gigahertz speed barrier. The goal of a terahertz transistor for high-speed computing and communications applications could now be within reach.

The goal of a terahertz transistor was not possible using the previous device structure, Feng said. "To achieve such speed in a typical HBT, the current density would become so large it would melt the components. In our pseudomorphic HBT, we can operate at higher frequencies with less current density. With this new material structure, a terahertz transistor is achievable."

Now that would be a sweet toy. Currently, the problem is the increasing temperature; the faster your processor, the hotter it gets. Right now, I have my computer running at a reduced speed. The computer is idle most of the time anyway and that 400MHz difference can rarely be noticed.

Fake Windows update fools

Found on The Inquirer on Sunday, 10 April 2005
Browse Software

The software giant Microsoft is warning about an email scam which encourages users to download a Trojan horse in the mistaken belief that they are updating their computers with a security patch.

Spinsters, from the Vole Hill in Redmond, said that the 'update' appears as a spam email. It points people to a bogus website that claims to host critical security updates. Of course anyone downloading from the site gets infected with the DSNX-05 trojan.

According to the BBC, media friendly anti-virus firm Sophos spotted the e-mail which uses subject lines saying "Urgent Windows Update" or "Important Windows Update".

That's nothing new at all... if MS just noticed those emails, then they probably never read newsgroups. I've seen those in many groups, with topics like above or eg. "apply this corrective patch"

Piercing the peer-to-peer myths

Found on First Monday on Saturday, 09 April 2005
Browse Filesharing

The Canadian government has been the target of intense lobbying for stronger copyright legislation in recent months. Led by the music industry, which claims that it has experienced significant financial losses due to music downloading, the campaign culminated in November 2004 with a lobby day on Parliament Hill.

Just weeks before the lobby day, CRIA General Counsel Richard Pfohl told a university audience that the figure was actually C$450 million per year since 1999, totaling roughly C$2 billion over the past five years.

Using CRIA's own numbers and 1999 as a benchmark, the cumulative decline in CD sales revenue in Canada is C$431.7 million. Given that total CD sales revenues during the period totaled C$3.7 billion, the percentage decline is a relatively modest 8.6 percent.

Although the music industry seems loath to discuss the matter publicly, according to an October 2004 Economist article, an internal music label study found that between 2/3 and 3/4 of recent sales declines had nothing to do with Internet music downloads.

The evidence suggests that Canadian artists have scarcely been harmed by the reduced sales from 1999 to 2004 since royalty losses are fully compensated through the private copying levy.

Following years of lobbying by CRIA, a new reality is only now coming to light - music downloading is not responsible for the ills of the music industry and Canadian artists have not been harmed by the sales declines that have occurred over the past five years.

I'd like to see how the industry lies its way out of that.

Best Buy Has Man Arrested for Using $2 Bills

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 08 April 2005
Browse Pranks

"Mike Bolesta of Baltimore thought he would protest Best Buy's not-so-great customer service and pay his bill with 57 $2 bills. For his trouble he got to spend some time in the county lock-up." From the article: "..Bolesta was contacted by the store, and was threated with police action if he did not pay the [installation] fee he was told before did not exist. As a sign of protest, Bolesta decided to pay using only $2 bills, which he has an abundance of because he asks his bank for them specifically. Unfortunately for him, the cashier did not seem to understand that the $2 bill is indeed legal US tender, since the bill itself is not often used. After rudely refusing to take the money, the cashier accepted the bills, only to mark them as though they were conterfeit."

One should think that cashiers are at least somewhat trained and familiar with the different kinds of bills.

Judge Sentences Spammer to Nine Years

Found on abc News on Thursday, 07 April 2005
Browse Legal-Issues

A Virginia judge sentenced a spammer to nine years in prison Friday in the nation's first felony prosecution for sending junk e-mail, though the sentence was postponed while the case is appealed.

A jury had recommended the nine-year prison term after convicting Jeremy Jaynes of pumping out at least 10 million e-mails a day with the help of 16 high-speed lines, the kind of Internet capacity a 1,000-employee company would need.

Jaynes, of Raleigh, N.C., told the judge that regardless of how the appeal turns out, "I can guarantee the court I will not be involved in the e-mail marketing business again."

One gone, more to come. Let's hope this scares off a few who think about making a fortune with spam.

EZTree Shuts Down

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 06 April 2005
Browse Legal-Issues

Easytree.org, a popular Bittorrent tracking site also known as EZT, shut down today after their ISP received threatening letters from attorneys. Unlike sites like Lokitorrent that have been shut down in the past, torrents on EasyTree were usually unreleased live musical performances rather than commercial product. Is a site that shares old Stevie Nicks, Frank Sinatra, and Ian Hunter live shows really that much of a threat to the music industry?

It's sad to see that being right or wrong is not a question of what you did, but of how much money you have. In most cases, such sites will shut down simply because of the costs; even if they may have done nothing wrong.

Court decision in music industry vs. heise online

Found on Heise on Wednesday, 06 April 2005
Browse Legal-Issues

In the legal dispute (reference: 21 O 3220/05) between eight companies from the music industry and German publisher Heise Zeitschriften Verlag, the first-instance district court of Munich I has just presented its written ruling. The matter in dispute was a report by heise online on a new version of software to make copies of DVDs. In the original version, this report not only took a critical view of software vendor Slysoft's claims, but also provided a link to the company's web site.

The Munich court ruled that, by providing a link to the company's homepage, heise online had intentionally provided assistance in the fulfillment of unlawful acts and is thus liable as an aider and abettor in accordance with Section 830 of the German Civil Code just as the vendor in itself is.

In its ruling, the court explained that the news ticker report neither constitutes "advertising for the sale of illegal goods" as defined in Section 95a of the German Copyright Act (UrhG), nor does it provide instructions on how to get around technical measures. Instead, this type of reporting is justified by the freedom of the press and is in the public interest. In other words, the court ruled that the press has the right to mention the name of the product, the name of the vendor, and the name of copy protection systems affected by the product.

The court specified the amount in dispute at 500,000 euros. This amount, the court found, reflects the "considerable profit losses" of the music industry and the "great publicity" due to the prominence of heise online among readers of IT information.

I'm getting so fed up with that entertainment industry; they go after everybody in order to supress alternatives, trying to keep their restrictive business model alive. On the other hand it's nice to know that, thanks to this lawsuit, Slysoft will get by far more media attention.

Feds beg Congress to expand PATRIOT Act

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 05 April 2005
Browse Various

US Attorney General and former White House torture apologist Alberto Gonzales warned the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday that certain temporary provisions of the so-called "Patriot" Act must not be allowed to expire as scheduled later this year.

"Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups still pose a grave threat to the security of the American people, and now is not the time to relinquish some of our most effective tools in this fight," Gonzales explained.

However, since terrorists will always pose a risk, Gonzales's argument is a slick way of admitting that the Feds have grown accustomed to the powers that Congress intended as temporary, and are determined to keep them. Which, of course, everyone has known from day one.

He has indicated that the Bush Administration might compromise slightly on some of the most objectionable permanent provisions, such as so-called "sneak and peek" warrants, or, as the Justice Department prefers to call them, "delayed notification" warrants, that allow the Feds to break into your house secretly, execute a search, and not tell you about it until they wish to.

How sweet is that? Of course you get used to power and don't want to give it back. But that Patriot Act was only a temporary idea and should be treated as such, meaning it will time out.

Americans may soon need passports

Found on CBC News on Monday, 04 April 2005
Browse Politics

In response to a new rule requiring most Canadians to carry passports for entry into the U.S., Public Security Minister Anne McLellan said Americans may also have to carry the document to enter the country.

McLellan's comments come as the U.S. State Department announced that by 2007, most Canadians will need a passport to enter the United States.

And by 2008, most Americans who visit Canada won't be able to re-enter their country without a passport.

Canadians without a passport will be barred from entering the United States after Dec. 31, 2006, unless they have a special U.S. "laser visa" border crossing card that includes a fingerprint or other "biometric identifier" such as a retinal scan.

The new rules will still allow Canadians to enter the United States without being fingerprinted. The U.S. demands a fingerprint from all other foreign visitors now.

The United States is also putting pressure on European countries to speed up introduction of new high-security passports containing a computer chip with a digital photograph.

Oh sweet paranoia. When the music industry can treat customers as potential pirates, America can treat visitors as criminals. Soon, fingerprints won't be enough: then they will need DNA samples (from you and your parents), detailed bank information, criminal and dental records, educational status (hey, you might be a trained terrorist) and you will have to pass a purity test. Of course you will have to wear a GPS tracking device during your visit. Welcome to the land of the free (no, not really). Thanks, but I won't come. Just a minor question: why do they want your photo on a chip on your passport? Can't they just look at an image?

New Technique for Tracking Web Site Visitors

Found on Slashdot on Sunday, 03 April 2005
Browse Internet

According to Jupiter Research, 58% of web surfers deleted cookies from their system in 2004. This has sent a loud message to marketers in regard to consumer's preference as to tracking their online activities. The marketers have responded with PIE. Persistent Identification Element (PIE) is a technology that uses Macromedia's Flash MX to track you even without using cookies. Macromedia has created a page to instruct users on how to disable this.

I don't delete cookies. I don't accept them in the first place, except for the few rare cases where they are useful (like boards). Then there are those shops which tell you that you have to accept cookies so you can use it. What a pity: they want to sell something. I simply chose another shop, which is more friendly. Some sites hammer you with cookie requests, even if it should be quite obvious that if the first cookie wasn't set, the 200th cookie won't be set either. That doesn't even make me yawn.