DNA Collection From All Those Arrested

Found on Washington Post on Sunday, 25 September 2005
Browse Legal-Issues

Suspects arrested or detained by federal authorities could be forced to provide samples of their DNA that would be recorded in a central database under a provision of a Senate bill to expand government collection of personal data.

The controversial measure was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and is supported by the White House, but has not gone to the floor for a vote. It goes beyond current law, which allows federal authorities to collect and record samples of DNA only from those convicted of crimes.

"When police retrace the history of a serial predator after he is finally caught, they often find that he never had a prior criminal conviction, but did have a prior arrest," Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said in a statement. "That means the only way they are likely to catch such a perpetrator after his first crime -- rather than his 10th -- is if authorities can maintain a comprehensive database of all those who are arrested, just as we do with fingerprints."

The provision, co-sponsored by Kyl and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), does not require the government to automatically remove the DNA data of people who are never convicted. Instead, those arrested or detained would have to petition to have their information removed from the database after their cases were resolved.

Privacy advocates are especially concerned about possible abuses such as profiling based on genetic characteristics.

Not only do they have a prior arrest, but they were also born. So why not just start to collect DNA samples from everybody? Honestly, unless someone has been convicted, he should be not be forced to provide a sample. Step by step, they try to create the transparent civilian.

LimeWire Works to Block Unlicensed Material

Found on Slyck on Sunday, 25 September 2005
Browse Filesharing

The current version of LimeWire is 4.9.30. As of this version, no impediments exist that disallows the free sharing of information. The occassional nag screen may pop up once and a while, however this is little more than a mere nuisance for the average user.

Approximately 3 to 5 days ago, LimeWire developers began working on two new branches, cc_reverify_interval-branch and cc-publish-branch. The code in the first branch works to verify that every file shared has a license. If this is not the case, the file will not be shared. The second branch is for publishing one's own work without a license. According to the release notes, individuals can attach a Creative Commons license if the work is either their own or have permission to distribute the work.

The EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation) stated the US Supreme Court ruling would have a chilling effect on technological development. This certainly appears true for commercial development; however LimeWire’s saving grace is its open source nature. LimeWire may soon block the trading of unlicensed files, but LimeWire variants will continue to exist.

They can't really believe that this will make sharing all files impossible. Limewire is published under the GNU license, and it won't take that long until fixes are out. Someone just needs to "repair" a few subroutines.

Flipper the firing dolphin let loose by Katrina

Found on The Observer on Sunday, 25 September 2005
Browse Various

It may be the oddest tale to emerge from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Armed dolphins, trained by the US military to shoot terrorists and pinpoint spies underwater, may be missing in the Gulf of Mexico.

Experts who have studied the US navy's cetacean training exercises claim the 36 mammals could be carrying 'toxic dart' guns. Divers and surfers risk attack, they claim, from a species considered to be among the planet's smartest. The US navy admits it has been training dolphins for military purposes, but has refused to confirm that any are missing.

Criticism from animal rights groups ensured the use of dolphins became more secretive. But the project gained impetus after the Yemen terror attack on the USS Cole in 2000. Dolphins have also been used to detect mines near an Iraqi port.

That's how it works: if you get criticised and people don't like your work, don't talk about it and continue.

British scientist calls US climate sceptics 'loonies'

Found on The Register on Saturday, 24 September 2005
Browse Nature

The chairman of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, Sir John Lawton, has called climate change deniers in the US "loonies", and says global warming is to blame for the increasingly strong hurricanes being spawned in the Atlantic.

Lawton said that with two such large storms hitting the Gulf coast in such quick succession, the Bush administration should re-evaluate its position on climate change. He said if the "extreme sceptics" in the US could be persuaded to change their minds, that would be "a valuable outcome [of] a horrible mess".

"There are a group of people in various parts of the world ... who simply don't want to accept human activities can change climate and are changing the climate. I'd liken them to the people who denied that smoking causes lung cancer."

Well, perhaps now the Kyoto protocol will get more support? It's about time

US army plans to bulk-buy anthrax

Found on New Scientist on Friday, 23 September 2005
Browse Various

The US military wants to buy large quantities of anthrax, in a controversial move that is likely to raise questions over its commitment to treaties designed to limit the spread of biological weapons.

A series of contracts have been uncovered that relate to the US army's Dugway Proving Ground in Utah. They ask companies to tender for the production of bulk quantities of a non-virulent strain of anthrax, and for equipment to produce significant volumes of other biological agents.

Whatever use it is put to, however, the move could be seen as highly provocative by other nations, he says. "What would happen to the Biological Weapons Convention if other countries followed suit and built large biological production facilities at secretive military bases known for weapons testing?"

That "we can have it, but you can't" attitude isn't really a good example for others. On one hand, the US (and many other countries) feel threatened by the Iranian nuclear program, yet the US still hoards nukes. And now biological weapons (I'm sure they already have a rather big arsenal, but this one is official).

Video game prices to cost more, permanently

Found on The Inquirer on Thursday, 22 September 2005
Browse Software

IF Activision's CEO Bobby Kotick gets his way, we'll all be paying an extra ten quid for our video games in the next few years.

Many presume that this hike is simply the first stage in next-gen console rollouts, as prices for launch titles of consoles have tended to be pricey in the past. However these price changes are here to stay. "We've said we're to going sell those products at higher price points until... the market forces us to sell them at lower price points, which we don't think is likely," Kotick said in a presentation at the Banc of America conference in San Francisco on Monday.

Market force? This market will force more users to P2P networks.

Labels tout program to disable swapping

Found on CNet News on Wednesday, 21 September 2005
Browse Filesharing

The music and movie industries are giving people who have swapped songs and other copyrighted material over the Internet a new way to repent for their illicit ways.

A free program released Thursday, called Digital File Check, will uninstall or disable file-sharing programs on people's computers. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), an affiliate of the Recording Industry Association of America in London, helped develop the software along with the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).

The software, available for download, will also search computers for music and movies and remove any illegal copies, the group said.

They can't honestly assume that this piece of code will have a signifcant impact. Those who use P2P know it and have little reason to run that software. I also wonder how reliable it will identify "pirated" media files. I doubt it comes with a list of MD5 checksums for "illegal" files. Perhaps it will just go for filenames? But some users have legal MP3's, so that won't work. Checksums for legal files also don't work, because one could edit the tags or re-encode it. It will probably just list all audio/video files and offer a "delete all to be sure" button.

Recruits Sought for Porn Squad

Found on Washington Post on Tuesday, 20 September 2005
Browse Legal-Issues

Early last month, the bureau's Washington Field Office began recruiting for a new anti-obscenity squad. Attached to the job posting was a July 29 Electronic Communication from FBI headquarters to all 56 field offices, describing the initiative as "one of the top priorities" of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and, by extension, of "the Director." That would be FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III.

The new squad will divert eight agents, a supervisor and assorted support staff to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults.

"I guess this means we've won the war on terror," said one exasperated FBI agent, speaking on the condition of anonymity because poking fun at headquarters is not regarded as career-enhancing. "We must not need any more resources for espionage."

Explicit sexual entertainment is a profit center for companies including General Motors Corp. and Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (the two major owners of DirecTV), Time Warner Inc. and the Sheraton, Hilton, Marriott and Hyatt hotel chains.

Like the agent said: it looks like the war on terror is won. Now better concentrate on the real dangerous stuff, like porn. Aren't we a little prudish here?

Hollywood finances pirate lab

Found on The Inquirer on Monday, 19 September 2005
Browse Filesharing

Hollywood has chosen speak like a pirate day to announce that six studios will be uniting to finance a multimillion-dollar research laboratory to find new ways to foil movie pirates.

The non-profit lab will be called Motion Picture Laboratories, or MovieLabs, and will start up later in the year.

It will have a budget of $30 million to spend over two years and is based on the perception the IT industry is not doing enough to tackle pirates.

MovieLabs will be looking at ways to jam camcorders, detect and block P2P transfers on campus and business networks.

It will build spyware for p2p networks and look at better ways to prevent home and personal digital networks from being tapped into by unauthorised users.

Some will never learn. Idiocy really knows no limits. Pumping $30 million into a dubious idea? If you keep in mind the (proven) fact that P2P increases revenues and that it's not stealing, you have to wonder why the industry fights something that has a positive effect. They have been unable to take advantage of their chance when P2P started; just because they are old-fashioned, greedy and short sighted. Instead, they offend consumers with limitations, faulty "copy protection", lawsuits and more. I just hope someone will sue them for the spyware they create. Or, when they try to jam camcorders with whatever-rays because it might cause cancer.

RIAA Trying to Copy-Protect Radio

Found on EFF on Monday, 19 September 2005
Browse Various

For some time, the RIAA has been pushing the FCC to impose a copy-protection mandate on the makers of next-generation digital radio receiver/recorders (think TiVo-for-radio).

Never mind that digital audio broadcasting is not significantly greater in quality than regular, analog radio. Never mind that it's of vastly less quality than that of audio CDs. In spite of these inconvenient facts, the RIAA is hoping that the transition to "digital audio broadcasting" will provide enough confusion and panic that they can persuade Congress or the FCC to impose some kind of copy-protection scheme or regulation on digital radio broadcast.

In other words, the music industry is basically saying that, where recording from next-generation radio is concerned, government must step in and freeze innovation to ensure that you can never do anything that you couldn't do with an analog cassette deck in 1984. This, despite the fact that Congress specifically approved of digital recording off the radio in the Audio Home Recording Act in 1992. So this is about stopping music fans from doing things that are perfectly legal under copyright law.

It's unbelieveable, but they really manage to collect more and more hate-points. I like (web)radio because it's good and free, because I don't like how the industry bullies everybody, because I don't want their crippled silver discs (which are not CDs, although they call them CDs), because the industry is too greedy and unflexible. Recording (web)radio is still legal so far and a good way to get your music. Even if some day it should be illegal, there would be no way to control it. Unless they raid your house regularly and check if you installed a ripper.