DRM: Hackers Batting 1000, Industry Zero

Found on Information Week on Wednesday, 01 August 2007
Browse Various

Whether the millions of kids who load up their iPods from LimeWire are thieves, or whether there's something incongruous about Sheryl Crow, a millionaire many times over, railing against piracy. When you look at the technology, there's no getting around the fact that DRM is an abject failure.

The 10-year-old Content Scrambling System employed on early DVDs is such a technological relic at this point that Crunchgear recently reported that: "According to the Finnish courts, CSS is so weak that it doesn't even count as a protective measure anymore."

In a game of iPod cat and mouse, the DRM system used in iTunes' music has been repeatedly cracked and then "fixed" by Apple. Last fall, the cracking program called QTFairUse6 had been updated so it could continue to perform its DRM-stripping duties within hours after Apple released iTunes 7.

There's been no update from the Advanced Access Content System people on the cracking of their AACS DRM, which is used in the new high-definition HD DVD and Blu-ray DVDs, since May 7.

The widely circulated crack comes in the form of a program called FairUse4M. The first iteration of this crack worked with Windows Media Player 10 under Windows XP, but for a long time wouldn't work on Vista. Alas, FairUse4M has now been updated to crack WMP11 running on Vista.

I think that speaks for itself. DRM is made to annoy those who don't have the skills to fix it; but it takes just one person who can get around, and the cat is out of the bag.

Teachers in websites closure call

Found on BBC News on Tuesday, 31 July 2007
Browse Censorship

Teachers have called for websites such as YouTube to be shut down as part of efforts to prevent pupils and staff being bullied.

Delegates at the conference of the Professional Association of Teachers (PAT) said bullying can continue outside school and work hours.

At the PAT annual conference in Harrogate, delegates heard that bullies have posted mobile phone videos on websites, showing teachers as well as pupils being attacked or humiliated.

They backed a motion demanding that such websites be closed down.

Emma-Jane Cross, chief executive of the charity Beatbullying, rejected the idea of closing down websites.

She said: "Calls for social networking sites like YouTube to be closed because of cyberbullying are as intelligent as calls for schools to be closed because of bullying."

It's hard to believe that such people are teachers. Their motto seems to be "see no evil, hear no evil". Just because bullying isn't on Youtube anymore, it won't go away. They should start to think about the reasons behind it and work at the roots. I wonder why they didn't come up with the idea to ban cell phones, cameras and groups of three or more people. Seems like it is easier to censor others and hide the real problems.

Eminem sues Apple for copyright infringement

Found on CNet News on Monday, 30 July 2007
Browse Legal-Issues

Rap singer Eminem has accused Apple of copyright infringement in a multimillion-dollar lawsuit, according to a story in The Detroit News.

Apple pays a portion of the revenue it collects from Eminem downloads to Universal Music Group, which distributes the music, but not to Eminem's publishers, the News reported. Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated, the companies representing Eminem, demand that Apple stop offering downloads.

"All the publishers are rankled that they have to go after the record labels to collect their fees," Sloan said. "Sometimes these fees may not be accounted for properly. The publishers would prefer to collect directly from the source instead of the labels."

I always have to laugh when a "gangsta rapper" sues someone; it somehow doesn't fit into their image at all.

Comcast Terms Change: You Lose Right to Sue

Found on WTOP on Sunday, 29 July 2007
Browse Legal-Issues

Customers who do not opt out within 30 days of receiving the Comcast Arbitration Notice will relinquish their right to pursue any legal remedies against Comcast in court, including claims for negligence, fraud or intentional wrongdoing. This means you lose the right to sue Comcast, while Comcast retains the right to sue you.

"On the surface, arbitration sounds like a good thing, but Comcast's proposed change is one-sided," Lawton says. "We are concerned that subscribers will unknowingly give up some of their consumer rights by failing to opt out in time."

It would be interesting to know if this approach is legal. Parts of a contract can be invalidated if they conflict with current laws.

KisMAC Developer Discontinues Project

Found on Slashdot on Saturday, 28 July 2007
Browse Software

Michael Rossberg lives in Germany and that country has recently passed laws that would make his participation dangerous. He urges visitors to take a copy of KisMAC and its source as long as the site is up, so that development might be continued outside the US or EU.

"There has not been a lot of time for KisMAC lately. However the motivation for this drastic step [lies] somewhere different. German laws change and are being adapted for 'better' protection against something politicians obviously do not understand. It will become illegal to develop, use or even posses KisMAC in this banana republic [i.e., Germany]."

And this makes the Internet more secure because...? Politicans are unable to realize that the Internet does not care about their local laws. Sure, some developers from Germany might stop, but the others in the world won't. Some might decide to continue via secure connections. Stopping security research is like a shot in the foot; nothing good comes from it. You cannot apply laws on the Internet; you have to learn using it and pay attention to what you do online. In theory, you could use everything for malicious purposes; but you can still buy weapons, hammers, baseball bats and so on.

Houston, We Have a Drinking Problem

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 27 July 2007
Browse Astronomy

A review panel, convened in the wake of the Lisa Nowak arrest to review astronaut medical and psychological screening, also reported "heavy use of alcohol" by astronauts before launch, within the standard 12-hour "bottle to throttle" rule applied to NASA flight crew members.

Meanwhile at Frenchie's Italian Restaurant, a popular astronaut hangout in Houston, owner Frankie Camera disputed the reports: "The Mercury astronauts may have been a little more wild (than later ones) but I did banquets for them and never really saw any of them drink so much they were out of control or drunk."

So that's why they never made it to the moon.

Leonard Nimoy to Play Spock

Found on Slashdot on Thursday, 26 July 2007
Browse Various

The AP is reporting that Leonard Nimoy will 'don his famous pointy ears again' in the next Star Trek movie, due out Christmas of next year. From the article: 'He greeted the crowd with a Vulcan salute. Nimoy was joined by the newly named young Spock, "Heroes" star Zachary Quinto [Sylar], who bears an uncanny resemblance to Nimoy. Both Spocks were introduced by the film's director and co-producer, J.J. Abrams.'

The one and only

US Senators call for universal Internet filtering

Found on Press Sec on Wednesday, 25 July 2007
Browse Internet

US senators today made a bipartisan call for the universal implementation of filtering and monitoring technologies on the Internet in order to protect children at the end of a Senate hearing for which civil liberties groups were not invited.

Commerce Committee Chairman Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii) and Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Vice Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) both argued that Internet was a dangerous place where parents alone will not be able to protect their children.

"While filtering and monitoring technologies help parents to screen out offensive content and to monitor their child’s online activities, the use of these technologies is far from universal and may not be fool-proof in keeping kids away from adult material," Sen. Inouye said.

The measures they are calling for include directing the Federal Communications Commission to identify industry practices "that can limit the transmission of child pornography" and requiring the Federal Trade Commission to form a working group to identify blocking and filtering technologies in use and "identify, what, if anything could be done to improve the process and better enable parents to proactively protect their children online."

I can't hear it anymore. Just because parents fail to look after their kids, everybody needs to be monitored? This "sweet" filtering solution will fail as soon as proxies and encryption comes into play. However, by using the old "protect children" approach, politicians can introduce monitoring more easily, because everybody who is against it "automatically" is a child molester. After such a surveillance has been established, it's easy to add new thngs to monitor, until everybody is made of glass.

Grylls' Thrills Bogus

Found on New York Post on Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Browse Various

Discovery Channel he-man Bear Grylls, the host of the survival-skills show "Man vs. Wild," is barely the man he seems to be on TV.

On the program, Grylls appears to camp out in quickly-built shelters deep in the wilderness while battling hypothermia and dehydration. But when the cameras stop rolling, Grylls has actually moved to luxurious hotels.

"If you really believe everything happens the way it is shown on TV, you are being a little bit naive," said Mark Weinert, an Oregon-based survival consultant, who said producers hired him as an adviser for the show.

In another instance, where Grylls was supposed to be surviving on a desert island, he was actually in Hawaii and spent nights at a motel, Weinert said.

In another episode, viewers watched as Grylls tried to coax what seemed like a wild mustang into a lasso in the Sierra Nevada.

In fact, Weinert said, the horses were not wild but were brought in by trailer.

This surprises people? It's TV; it should be in the news if something on there is actually true.

ISP Seen Breaking Internet Protocol

Found on Wired on Monday, 23 July 2007
Browse Internet

Internet service provider Cox Communications is reportedly diverting attempts to reach certain online chat channels and redirecting them to a server that attempts to remove spyware from the computer.

Specifically, Cox's DNS server is responding to a domain name request for an Internet Relay Chat server. Instead of responding with the correct IP address for the server, Cox sends the IP address of its own IRC server (70.168.70.4). That server then sends commands to the computer that attempt to remove malware.

Though clever, the tactic is being heavily debated by networking experts on the NANOG mailing list, some of whom question the effectiveness of the technique and who question whether blocking access to the channels for all users (by breaking the DNS protocol) in order to stop some malware is the appropriate solution.

Even if my computer is infected, an ISP has no legal basis to attempt to fix it. That's as illegal as planting the zombie. This reminds me of the "Make Love Not Spam" project and some counter-virus-viruses; all not legal. Notifying? Perhaps, but that would show that the ISP monitors my connection for bot-related commands; something that doesn't go along with net neutrality. And honestly, if I would be a developer of zombiekits, my new update would wreak havoc on the computer as soon as someone tries to clean it with "uninstall" or "remove"; the machine is lost if it succeeds, so why not make it messy for whoever attempted to cleaned it?