Anonymous Facebook Employee

Found on The Rumpus on Wednesday, 20 January 2010
Browse Internet

"So when we store your photos, we have six versions of your photos. We don't store the original: we make six different versions on the photo uploader and upload those six versions."

"We still keep all information. What I was referring to, is that if anything, we're going to start deleting more photos for performance reasons."

"I'm not going to give you the exact password, but with upper and lower case, symbols, numbers, all of the above, it spelled out 'Chuck Norris,' more or less. It was pretty fantastic."

I admit that the quotes seem not very impressive; but if you are, unlike me, a Facebook user, read the whole interview.

Google: Keep user data safe by letting us hoard it forever

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 19 January 2010
Browse Internet

Privacy supremo Peter Fleischer told ComputerWorld in an interview that, "The unprecedented hacking... and the threat of similar such attacks in the future emphasized the importance of internal analysis of logs."

"We find it reprehensible that a company would throw away useful data when it holding it poses no privacy threat," Fleischer thundered.

I wouldn't mind keeping Fleischer's personal data, emails, medical records and search history. As long as I have it there is no privacy threat. But if someone breaks into my house, there will be a big oops. Of course that's based on the assumption that Fleischer trusts me; something I don't when it comes to Google.

ISP Stands Up For Torrent Site Owner's Privacy

Found on TorrentFreak on Monday, 18 January 2010
Browse Filesharing

The Swedish ISP TeliaSonera is refusing to comply with a court ruling ordering the company to hand over information identifying the owner of SweTorrents.

In its appeal, the ISP argues that IPRED is in direct violation of the EU’s data retention directive, under which the privacy of the SweTorrents owner would be protected.

TeliaSonera further notes that in its ruling the District Court speaks of "the material that is uploaded on the website," even though there is no copyright material on SweTorrents, only torrent links.

A court that has obviously not the least understanding of the involved technology should at least take the time to learn a little before making rulings. No wonder lobbyists have quite a success when it comes to introducing draconian laws to protect a dying business.

U.S. To Costa Rica: No Sugar Access Without Copyright Reform

Found on MIchael Geist on Sunday, 17 January 2010
Browse Politics

Reports from Costa Rica indicate that final approval of the Central American Free Trade Agreement with the United States is languishing in the Legislative Assembly due to concerns over the copyright provisions.

Health officials are concerned that the provisions on pharmaceutical products "would bankrupt the public health system." The response from the U.S. is important as well. It is delaying market access to sugar from the developing country until the copyright reforms are in place.

Now filesharers even crash the sugar market. Who would have thought that a little piracy from within your basement forces lobbyists to blackmail a whole country?

New York Times to charge online readers

Found on CNet News on Saturday, 16 January 2010
Browse Internet

The newspaper is expected to announce in coming weeks that it will institute a metered pay plan in which readers would have access to a limited number of free articles before being invited to subscribe, according to a report in New York magazine that cited sources close to the newsroom.

The New York Times abandoned a two-year experiment with the Web-subscription model in 2007, suggesting that the company's projections for subscriber revenue were small compared with advertising sales.

A Harris poll released earlier this month found that 77 percent said they wouldn't pay anything to read a newspaper's stories on the Web.

If it works for them, so be it. I'm just curious if paying readers will still see ads or not.

Science project prompts SD school evacuation

Found on Sign on San Diego on Friday, 15 January 2010
Browse Pranks

A vice principal saw the student showing it to other students at school about 11:40 a.m. Friday and was concerned that it might be harmful, and San Diego police were notified.

Luque said the project was made of an empty half-liter Gatorade bottle with some wires and other electrical components attached. There was no substance inside.

A MAST robot took pictures of the device and X-rays were evaluated. About 3 p.m., the device was determined to be harmless, Luque said.

The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said.

Counseling for doing nothing wrong? It's amazing that sticking some cables into an empty bottle now makes you look like an insanse terrorist. The vice principal should get some serious counseling; he could have simply asked the student instead of throwing a hissy fit and calling in a whole army, only to make himself look like a fool. Seems like this is what the world has turned into: terrorists have won. Sure, you're not going to be bombed away away every day (in fact, chances to die in a terroristic attack are close to zero), but the majority of the population now lives in the fear of attacks (happily fueled by the governments who can easily extent surveillance) and sees threats and danger everywhere.

Law Firm Suing China Hit By Cyber Attack

Found on ImformationWeek on Thursday, 14 January 2010
Browse Internet

The firm's initial investigation has shown that at least some of the e-mail messages originated in China and that some of the malware payloads were on servers in China.

Gipson Hoffman & Pancione has yet to receive any response from the Chinese government or the companies named in its lawsuit, which seeks $2.2 billion in lost sales for the 56 million copies of Green Dam distributed in China.

It's quite surprising that China can filter incoming traffic so well but for some weird reason is unable to find all those evil evil hackers who are, of course, not working for the government.

China Tells Google to Follow the Law

Found on eWEEK on Wednesday, 13 January 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

The Chinese government had a relatively straightforward response Jan. 14 to Google's threat to stop censoring searches on its Chinese language site, Google.cn: Follow the law.

"This incident should be equally troubling to the Chinese government. The administration encourages the government of China to work with Google and other U.S. companies to ensure a climate for secure commercial operations in the Chinese market."

All that is not much of a problem. China's law which enforces censorship is nothing one would like to follow. Of course, China doesn't want that. So, to make everybody happy, pull out of China. If you are not doing any business there, you don't need to follow their laws. And if China is not happy with what you are doing online, they can just block you.

French 3 Strikes Group Unveils Copyright Infringing Logo

Found on TorrentFreak on Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

Last week the group unveiled the logo which is set to represent this bastion of copyright righteousness, but embarrassingly it was designed with unlicensed fonts.

"The problem is, this font was an 'exclusive corporate typeface'. It couldn't be used for other purposes than France Telecom/Orange products," he told us.

Yesterday there was panic, as Hadopi tried to repair the damage by sourcing new matching fonts they could license legally.

Sarkozy's government strikes again. Their list of copyright violations is growing fast: using music without permission (twice even), counterfeiting 400 DVDs and now this.

Founder of Oink file-sharing site had £20,000 savings

Found on BBC News on Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Browse Filesharing

A Teesside man received $18,000 (£11,000) a month in donations from people using his pirate music website, a court has heard.

Peter Makepeace, cross-examining the defendant for the prosecution, said: "The money was rolling in, wasn't it?

Mr Makepeace said: "You were a wealthy man for someone who had only been working a few months."

I don't know how much Makepeace earns, but I wouldn't consider someone who has £20,000 sitting in his bank accounts a wealthy man. Perhaps they forgot a zero or two somewhere.