Warning over tax return deadline e-mail 'phishing' scam

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 30 January 2010
Browse Pranks

Tens of thousands of fraudulent e-mails have been sent out ahead of Sunday's tax return deadline, officials say.

HMRC is expecting a massive upsurge in such correspondence following the 31 January deadline when many people will be waiting to hear about genuine tax refunds.

Ok, here and there people fall for all sorts of scam, no secret. But seriously, the thought of getting a tax return should tip you off like nothing else. It's more likely to get a few millions from some former Nigerian president who had to flee.

Multitasking: Intel does, iPad doesn't

Found on CNet News on Friday, 29 January 2010
Browse Hardware

For the iPad, however, Apple is betting that the snappy interface, as demonstrated in this CNET video, will more than compensate for the lack of multitasking.

"Consumers want to do multiple things at the same time: listen to music while browsing the Web, look for directions while looking at your calendar and talking with your friends, and so on," he said in response to an e-mail query.

It's not like you could do much anyway. No USB, no camera, no multitasking, no flash support, no phone abilities and a weird name. The only impressive thing is how unimpressive it is.

Tigers and other farmyard animals

Found on BBC News on Thursday, 28 January 2010
Browse Nature

Tigers on the farms are kept in cages and are also allowed to chase cows or chickens for the amusement of the paying public.

According to her research, farm tigresses produce cubs at about three times or more their natural rate, bearing up to three litters a year. Cubs are often taken away from their mothers before they are properly weaned.

"The part [of the farm] which people rarely see is basically a winery in which the skeletons of grown tigers are cleaned and put into vats of wine," says Ms Mills.

Usually China fakes everything it comes across, from watches to pills to clothes. But it's awfully honest when it comes to idiotic products like tiger bone wine.

Who will buy the iPad?

Found on CNet News on Wednesday, 27 January 2010
Browse Hardware

Many took to Twitter, Facebook, and tech blogs, including here at CNET, to voice dissatisfaction with everything from the size, the price, the specs, and the content available, to the usage model.

Many serious lovers of technology sound disappointed that Apple did not surpass or even meet the outsized expectations they placed on this new device.

It's not a laptop and it's not a phone or a music player. So what is it, and how exactly will they explain it to potential buyers?

Not to mention it's limiting what you can do. Only software from Apple's store. That's not the freedom the tech people want. Plus, don't forget that name. Fujitsu is already checking with lawyers since it relased an IPad back in 2002. And iPads might sound familiar to many women too.

Should Copyright Holders Pay For Bogus DMCA Takedowns?

Found on Techdirt on Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

While the court eventually did (much to many people's surprise) say that copyright holders do need to take fair use into account, it's not really clear what sort of punishment there is for those who do not.

Given how massive the damage awards can be for simple (even incidental or accidental) copyright infringement, the fact that there is barely any real punishment for bogus copyright claims seems incredibly one-sided and unfair.

The loser pays; it's like that in court so a fake DMCA shouldn't be an exception. Especially since that law is abused a lot. Sure, accidents happen sometimes, but in many cases it's just a blatant abuse to take down perfectly fine content.

Piracy letter campaign 'nets innocents'

Found on BBC News on Monday, 25 January 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

More than 150 people have approached consumer publication Which? Computing claiming to have been wrongly targeted in crackdowns on illegal file-sharing.

Andrew Crossley, of ACS:Law, said that some cases had been dropped although he declined to give numbers.

Some are already in the process of going to court, he told BBC News, although the majority of the accused settle out of court.

That's one way to make money: fire out thousands of threatening letters and let the recipients pay up. Drop those who complain and if it goes to court, admit a "rare" error and drop the case.

Chinese Human Rights Sites Hit by DDoS Attack

Found on PC World on Sunday, 24 January 2010
Browse Censorship

The Web site of Chinese Human Rights Defenders, an advocacy group, was hit by a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack that lasted 16 hours starting Saturday afternoon, the group said in an e-mailed statement on Monday.

Google this month said it had been hit by cyberattacks from China partly aimed at accessing the Gmail accounts of human rights activists.

Coincidences? I don't think so, Tim.

PayPal Freezes the Assets of Wikileaks.org

Found on Slashdot on Saturday, 23 January 2010
Browse Various

"Paypal has as of 23rd of January 2010 frozen WikiLeaks assets. This is the second time that this happens. The last time we struggled for more than half a year to resolve this issue. By working with the respected and recognized German foundation Wau Holland Stiftung we tried to avoid this from happening again - apparently without avail."

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Wikileaks should have abandoned PayPal after the first account lock; or transferred all the money at least once a day out of the account to a real bank. PayPal is known for denying you access to your money without giving much of a reason. So: just don't use it.

How Google's Nexus One censors cuss words

Found on CNet News on Friday, 22 January 2010
Browse Censorship

Your Nexus One will not be so charmed by the vigor of your tongue. It will, dare I utter the word when referring to a product from the newly emancipated Google, censor you.

Every time they said something naughty into the phone, the naughty word came out as "####"--and not just "f---." It even censored the "S" part of BS.

"We filter potentially offensive or inappropriate results because we want to avoid situations whereby we might misrecognize a spoken query and return profanity when, in fact, the user said something completely innocent," Google told Reuters.

Really, if you blindly rely on a speech to text functionality without proofreading before you send it to your boss, you deserve all the troubles you get for sending out profanities. It only makes people pay less attention because of a "the phone will fix my faults" thinking. Seriously, ####.

Music biz: piracy our "climate change," governments must act!

Found on Ars Technica on Thursday, 21 January 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

According to this view of the world, the music business has now tried its hand at being "innovative" and "customer focused."

IFPI admits that only 15 percent of European Internet users even engage in piracy at all, and it further admits that many of these users purchase music, but it still claims that piracy is the "fundamental problem."

As for what's selling, these are the major labels, so the top 10 singles are pretty execrable stuff unless you like Lady Gaga, Britney Spears, or songs with titles like "Kiss Me Thru the Phone" and "Boom Boom Pow."

Over the years, the industry has turned music into something totally uninteresting for me. It's not even worth sharing it because, honestly, all that mainstream music is worthless. Free (as in beer) music is more interesting and, not to forget, less dangerous for the everyday downloader. So, thanks to the big labels for their log-time efforts to drive users away from their content and for bringing attention to those artists who don't mind filesharing because they realized it only helps them.