App developers withdraw from US over patent fears

Found on The Guardian on Sunday, 17 July 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

App developers are withdrawing their products for sale from the US versions of Apple's App Store and Google's Android Market for fear of being sued by companies which own software patents.

The growth of patent lawsuits over apps raises serious issues for all the emerging smartphone platforms, because none of the principal companies involved - Apple, Google or Microsoft - can guarantee to protect developers from them.

Software patents should have never been granted in the first place. A whole economy has evolved around them and countless trolls use ridiculous broad patents for extortions.

Facebook bans Google+ ad

Found on CNet News on Saturday, 16 July 2011
Browse Internet

App developer Michael Lee Johnson, conscious of the need to be big on Google+ or be nobody, wondered what the best way to levitate his Google+ circles might be. He hit upon a fine idea: he placed an ad on Facebook. It was a simple thing that was headlined: "Add Michael to Google+."

You're not guessing what happened with the ad, are you? You know what happened, don't you? Facebook didn't, according to Johnson, merely erase this heinous horse of Troy from its pages. It reportedly banned all his other campaigns too.

Thank you Facebook. Thank you for making that little ad, which millions of your users would have never seen, hit the news. Use this chance to learn about the Streisand effect.

Montco woman wins victory over Verizon

Found on Philly on Friday, 15 July 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

Bernice Keebler had a simple complaint: Verizon billed her $4.19 for six "local calls" but wouldn't tell her where she'd called - not unless she got a lawyer and a subpoena.

In a decision released today by the PUC's communications office, Administrative Law Judge Mary D. Long proposed fining Verizon Pennsylvania $1,000 for failing in its duty to provide "adequate customer service".

Verizon has anything close to customer service? They really should have seen this coming when they tried to scare of a customer.

Comcast Bans Seattle Man From Internet for His Cloudy Ways

Found on Wired on Thursday, 14 July 2011
Browse Internet

Vrignaud, it seems, committed the foul of using more than 250 GB of data on Comcast two months in a row, triggering the company's overage policy that results in a year-long ban from using its services.

And all Comcast is saying is that he's kicked off - and under the terms of the ban, he can't even switch to a uncapped, higher-priced, lower-speed business connection.

Spokesman Charlie Douglas says the 250 GB limit, which it imposed in October 2008 after agreeing to not throttle peer-to-peer traffic, is intended to keep users like Vrignaud from impacting their neighbors.

"People should be careful if they have a terabyte of data to back-up," Douglas said. "They should manage their consumption carefully, and do it over time."

So, in other words, Comcast punished Vrignaud because they failed to improve their network, which is the main job of an ISP. If their business plan evolves around the assumption that users won't make traffic, they are up for a rough awakening.

China: 1.3 million websites shut in 2010

Found on BBC News on Wednesday, 13 July 2011
Browse Internet

The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences said there were were 41% fewer websites at the end of 2010 than a year earlier.

Civil rights campaigners have long railed against China's web censors, who impose controls known as the Great Firewall of China.

A number of websites are routinely blocked, such as the BBC's Chinese language service, and social media sites like Facebook, Youtube and Twitter.

It should be 100%, officially. The fewer websites from that regime, the better. Until a revolution starts in China, that is.

Database high priest mud wrestles Facebook

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 12 July 2011
Browse Software

Last week, in a piece from our friends at GigaOM, Database Grandpoobah Mike Stonebraker announced that Facebook's continued dependance on MySQL was "a fate worse than death," insisting that the social network's only route to salvation is to "bite the bullet and rewrite everything."

Stonebraker's Facebook comments drew fire not only from a core database engineer at Mark Zuckerberg's social networking outfit, but also from the recognized kingpin of "cloud computing": Amazon chief technology officer Werner Vogels.

So Stonebraker hates MySQL. Of course it might be just a strange coincidence that the same Stonebraker helped develop Postgres and now works on VoltDB. So this is pretty much a PR stunt to get some attention.

Warner Music Group Employee Charged With Stealing $700,000

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 11 July 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

What is it with recording industry folks getting charged with actual theft these days? First we had folks from the Spanish music collection society SGAE charged with a complicated scheme to divert money from artists to themselves. Then we had the story of IFPI execs doing something similar. Now comes the news that a single employee at Warner Music, Andrew Robertson, whose job was "equipment buyer," may have stolen somewhere around $700,000 over a four year period.

That is stealing. Filesharing is not. Otherwise both would have $700,000 now. Perhaps the entertainment industry can understand it with such a simple example. I doubt that though.

Wordpress hits fifty million web sites

Found on The Inquirer on Sunday, 10 July 2011
Browse Internet

"Total WordPress sites just passed '50 million' today!", wrote Wordpress core developer Andrew Nacin yesterday as he pointed readers to the ever-counting up Wordpress user clock.

The Wordpress stats page also provides other fascinating information, such as the fact that in the week ending 3 July its users enjoyed some 579,930,820 page views of 2,794,824 posts.

They should remove all the spam and clone sites from that number; then it would be way, way smaller. There's basicially a whole economy build around Wordpress which focuses on automated installs and postings to boost the ranking of other pages.

The Copyright Lobby Absolutely Loves Child Pornography

Found on TorrentFreak on Saturday, 09 July 2011
Browse Filesharing

"Child pornography is great," the man said enthusiastically. "Politicians do not understand file sharing, but they understand child pornography, and they want to filter that to score points with the public. Once we get them to filter child pornography, we can get them to extend the block to file sharing."

The date was May 27, 2007, and the man was Johan Schlüter, head of the Danish Anti-Piracy Group (Antipiratgruppen).

"We must associate file sharing with child pornography. Because that's something the politicians understand, and something they want to filter off the Internet."

The copyright industry lobby is actively trying to hide egregious crimes against children, obviously not because they care about the children, but because the resulting censorship mechanism can be a benefit to their business if they manage to broaden the censorship in the next stage.

Well, looks like somebody thinks of the children; but only as a tool for financial benefits. By doing so, the lobbyists of the entertainment industry are actively profiting from child abuse; they even seem to be happy that it exists because it gives them a sledgehammer argument: if you hate it, you need to support censorship. If you are against this censorship, you obviously are a sicko.

Israel uses Facebook to stymie 'flytilla'

Found on CBC News on Saturday, 09 July 2011
Browse Censorship

Israel had tracked the activists on social media sites like Facebook, compiled a blacklist of about 300 names and asked airlines to keep those on the list off flights to Israel.

"Lufthansa called me last night and said I would not be allowed to board their plane because Israel denied me entry," Beatt said.

An EasyJet spokesman in Geneva, Adrian Fuhrer, said 40 people were prevented from boarding the plane at the request of Israeli authorities.

So let's think about this a little bit. Let's put aside the fact that it's a stupid idea to use your real name and information on Facebook, who has notorious privacy issues. Let's look at the fact that a nation uses Facebook information to create no-fly lists of terrorist suspects. With a little effort, anybody could create a fake profile, using someone else's name, and effectively ruin the chances to board a plane for that person.