FBI Continues To Foil Its Own Devised Terrorist Plots

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 17 September 2012
Browse Legal-Issues

That pattern goes something like this: hear that a huge explosion was averted and lives were saved, find out the plotter was an American citizen, find out he was under investigation by the FBI for several years, and then finally find out that it was the FBI that egged on the suspect and built his "bomb" for him.

"The bomb, which was inert and had been constructed by FBI technicians, didn't explode, according to federal authorities."

Simple rule for easy citizen control: let them have their fear, and fuel it. If nothing would happen, people would start to ask why these privacy invasions and governmental controls are needed; but if you present a possible terrorist now and then (even if you made everything up for him), people will keep believing that all this control is needed.

Is it true that "not everyone can be a programmer"?

Found on Ars Technica on Sunday, 16 September 2012
Browse Software

An old adage that many programmers stick to: "It takes a certain type of mind to learn programming, and not everyone can do it."

People may study success in college-level courses and conclude "some people aren't fit to learn programming". However, such a conclusion severely oversteps the bounds of the observed evidence. How much failure could instead be attributed to how the programming is taught (too abstract?), or which style of programming is taught (too imperative?), or the programming environment (compilation, no immediate feedback?).

Of course you can blame a lack of education, but that does not change the fact that some people are not able to be programmers. There is a certain way of breaking up a problem into logical pieces in your mind, and that's not something everybody can do. The majority maybe, but not everybody.

Europe hits old internet address limits

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 15 September 2012
Browse Internet

From now on, companies can only make one more application for IPv4 addresses and, if successful, will only get 1,024 of them.

On 14 September Ripe NCC got down to its last 16 million IPv4 addresses. While this might sound a lot, said Mr Pawlik, the use of this last substantial block would be so heavily restricted that the supply could be considered to be at an end.

Other techniques based around technical tricks that share IPv4 addresses among many different devices would prove increasingly unworkable, he said.

Or the RIPE could demand some address blocks back from those who already do have millions, instead of bugging many medium and small IT companies. The DoD alone manages eleven /8 netblocks, or 184,549,376 IP addresses. AT&T and Level3 have also two /8 blocks each. There's also the question why other companies have entire /8 blocks, like Bell, Daimler, DuPont, Eli Lilly, Ford, GE, Halliburton, HP, Prudential Securities and Xerox. If those handful clean up and shrink their address spaces, IPv4 could easily last for many more years.

Red Hat's new patent troll weapon: GPL violation

Found on IT World on Friday, 14 September 2012
Browse Legal-Issues

Red Hat has taken a unique step in defending itself from a patent infringement claim from Twin Peaks Software: a counterclaim that Twin Peaks is in copyright violation on mount, the file management app that is licensed under the GPLv2.

Curiously, the storage technology that Twin Peaks is claiming as infringed was originally developed by Gluster… but it wasn't until Red Hat acquired Gluster in October 2011 that Twin Peaks got around to suing Gluster and its new owner.

Red Hat's legal-fu is massive, because it's using the fact that there is still a lot of non-compliance of the GPL out there to its clear advantage. And, as Groklaw reported this morning, the risk to Twin Peaks is far greater now.

Seems like this didn't work out the way Twin Peaks planned it. After waiting until Red-Hat bought Gluster they hoped to make some money from that too after "re-discovering" their old patents.

French 3 Strikes: Court Fines First File-Sharer, Even Though He’s Innocent

Found on TorrentFreak on Thursday, 13 September 2012
Browse Legal-Issues

After his account was connected to a series of previous infringements, a 40 year-old man was summoned to court today. Despite a third-party admitting that the music piracy in question was carried out by them and not the accused, the court still decided to fine the account holder.

According to the Hadopi law it doesn’t matter that the man didn’t carry out the infringements himself – as the owner of the Internet connection in question he is responsible for what happens on it.

I must have missed the case where the previous french president was in front of this court; after all, there have been numerous occasions where the top of the french government should have received warnings and in the end a invitation from the judge. Not much égalité in France.

File-sharer will take RIAA case to Supreme Court

Found on Ars Technica on Wednesday, 12 September 2012
Browse Legal-Issues

Thomas-Rasset, a young Minnesota mom, was the first US file-sharer to take her RIAA-initiated lawsuit all the way to a trial and a verdict back in 2007. Five years, three trials, and one appeal later, she owes $222,000 to the recording industry for sharing songs on the Kazaa file-sharing network, but she doesn't plan to quit fighting.

Thomas-Rasset will follow Joel Tenenbaum, the second US resident to take his file-sharing case that far.

Something is essentially wrong with the legal system if the assumed damages are between $2,250 and $80,000 for each song. Songs which you usually pay $0.99 for. That must have been some massive commercial filesharing there to justify such amounts. I'm sure they would not make such claims against your everyday mother.

The school that swapped its laptops for iPads… and wants to switch back

Found on PC Pro on Tuesday, 11 September 2012
Browse Hardware

The reader, who asked not to be identified, is an ICT co-ordinator at a secondary school. He tells how his “image-conscious” headmaster was seduced by a scheme that allowed all the school’s staff to replace their laptop computers with an iPad 2.

“Some staff are needing to produce documents and resources by remoting in [to a PC] on an iPad,” our source reveals. “Trying to operate Microsoft Word using a remote app that dumps you out of the connection is a nightmare.”

“One of the biggest problems is the storage, since you can’t connect USB memory sticks to it,” our teacher writes, adding that staff are now experimenting with Dropbox to get documents on their tablets, which raises inevitable questions about data security.

It's not like this was impossible to test before they bought all the iPads. They could have borrowed a single one and hand it around so that everybody can see how limited they are as a replacement for a laptop or PC. Unfortunately, those in charge don't spend their own money.

GoDaddy hosted websites down 'in possible hack attack'

Found on BBC News on Monday, 10 September 2012
Browse Internet

Thousands of websites hosted by one of the world's biggest internet domain registrars and web hosts, GoDaddy, were reported down on Monday.

"If it is true, then that has not been constructed to scale up in a sisable DDos. The GoDaddy site can cope with a sizable amount of traffic, but its DNS may not have been.

One would think that they have a more robust DNS system in place.

PayPal exec gets personally involved in account dispute

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 09 September 2012
Browse Various

After ordering a violin smashed earlier this year and freezing an account designed to let people donate toys to underprivileged children, the payment processor appears to be trying to put a more human face on its corporate image.

So is PayPal turning a leaf and serious about improving customer relations and communications? We shall see.

It's still the best to avoid PayPal completely and never let them touch a single cent of your money.

Amazon backtracks, will offer $15 opt-out for ads on Kindle Fire tablets

Found on CNet News on Saturday, 08 September 2012
Browse Various

"I wanted to let you know that with Kindle Fire HD there will be a special offers opt-out option for $15. We know from our Kindle reader line that customers love our special offers and very few people choose to opt out. We're happy to offer customers the choice."

The ensuing reaction on social media was, suffice it to say, mostly negative. Even though it's widely understood that the sponsorships help keep the Kindle prices low, the lack of choice struck a nerve with potential consumers.

Now if the Kindle would be similar to a PC, you'd just install your favorite ad-blocker and block the annoying ads.