Creator of Top iOS Ad Blocker Pulls App After Two Days

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 18 September 2015
Browse Internet

One of the most important aspects of the iOS 9 launch was that ad blocking software is now allowed on the App Store. Ad blocking apps rocketed to the top of the store's rankings, led by Marco Arment's Peace. A day afterward, Arment talked about the cognitive dissonance he felt from having his software blocking the (admittedly well-behaving) ads on his own website. Now, Arment has pulled Peace from the App Store, saying its success "just doesn't feel good."

He pulls the app two days after he released the finished product? At the moment it went public his moral compass pointed into another direction? That explanation is really hard to buy (no conspirancy theory intended).

Google accuses SEO biz Local Lighthouse of false claims, robo-calls

Found on The Register on Thursday, 17 September 2015
Browse Internet

The American web goliath has taken legal action against the smaller biz in the northern district of California, alleging Local Lighthouse uses nuisance calls to sell its services. Google accuses the Costa Mesa, California-based SEO gang of breaking laws on trademarks, unfair competition, and false advertising.

Google claims Local Lighthouse sales representatives were introducing themselves as "Google Local Listing representatives" – and had been using software to play pre-recorded messages to people in cold-calls, or in other words: robo-dialers.

People should not rely on "unique" Wordpress websites, stuffed with tons of SEO plugins or optimizers in the grey area and create truly unique websites instead.

Irving police: no charges against Ahmed Mohamed, but race played no role in arrest

Found on Dallas Morning News on Wednesday, 16 September 2015
Browse Legal-Issues

Ahmed Mohamed — who makes his own radios and repairs his own go-kart — hoped to impress his teachers when he brought a homemade clock to MacArthur High on Monday.

They led Ahmed into a room where four other police officers waited. He said an officer he’d never seen before leaned back in his chair and remarked: “Yup. That’s who I thought it was.”

“He said, ‘It looks like a movie bomb to me.’”

It would be so helpful if people could be arrested for being stupid. That could get a lot of people who watch CSI and can identify "movie bombs" into jail, making room for those who are innocent and just try to learn and gain experience by actually building something.

Intelligent machines: Call for a ban on robots designed as sex toys

Found on BBC News on Tuesday, 15 September 2015
Browse Future

Such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable, said campaign leader Dr Kathleen Richardson.

She believes that they reinforce traditional stereotypes of women and the view that a relationship need be nothing more than physical.

"We think that the creation of such robots will contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women, adults and children, men and men and women and women," she said.

Those robots are just bigger vibrators which haven't had much of evil influence on relationships.

Dept. of Justice shutters Sharebeast, the largest US-based filesharing service

Found on Ars Technica on Monday, 14 September 2015
Browse Legal-Issues

On Friday, the Department of Justice and the RIAA claimed another victory in the never-ending battle against file-sharing when the government agency seized the domain of Sharebeast.com.

Sharebeast included pirate content beyond music as well. A studio-commissioned report from 2014 showed Sharebeast was one of the Top 250 sites for pirated music and TV files in the UK for instance. And when FIFA and its partners pushed hard to eliminate illicit streams of the 2014 World Cup, Sharebeast was one of the sites the football (soccer) organization asked to be blocked.

That's why the control of domains has to be removed from the US and migrated into an independent institution. You should be able to defend yourself in court before your company is shut down.

Website hackers hijack Google webmaster tools to prolong infections

Found on IT World on Sunday, 13 September 2015
Browse Internet

Hackers who compromise websites are also increasingly verifying themselves as the owners of those properties in Google's Search Console. Under certain circumstances this could allow them to remain undetected longer than they otherwise would be, researchers warn.

If the legitimate owners don't read the notifications and take immediate action, the attackers can actually remove them from the Search Console verification list by deleting their HTML verification files from the server. This will trigger no notifications to the real owners, according to Sucuri senior malware researcher Denis Sinegubko.

Most of those exploited websites exist because people just use standard CMS systems like Wordpress or Joomla and do not bother to keep the system (and all its plugins) updated. Especially plugins give a wrong impression of security if the original author abandoned the project and no more updates are released, despite exploitable bugs.

How to Fix the Many IoT Security Gaps That Nobody Is Thinking About

Found on eWEEK on Saturday, 12 September 2015
Browse Technology

Nobody really knows for sure how many such IoT devices are connected and communicating at any given time. Estimates by Cisco suggest that the total in 2015 may reach over 10 billion. By 2016 some estimates suggest that there may be more connected devices than there are people on Earth. Only a few high profile devices have any security at all.

While it’s likely to be nearly impossible to simply add security to existing sensors and controllers that make up this part of the IoT, perhaps it’s possible to begin with a more measured approach. Clearly some of those things are reporting on critical infrastructure and should be upgraded as quickly as possible.

Why not just hold the manufacturer liable in case of blatant security issues? For example, NAS drives with a default password backdoor (which are pretty common), or the use of known weak (or no) encryption.

Adam Miller Says He'll Reopen Bogus Copyright Lawsuit Against Critic

Found on Techdirt on Friday, 11 September 2015
Browse Legal-Issues

The so-called, self-professed "faith healer" sued an online critic, Stephanie Guttormson, earlier this year. It was a clear SLAPP lawsuit. Guttormson had taken one of Miller's laughable promotional videos and added some commentary mocking it.

Adam Miller is back and he's insisting that he's going to reopen the lawsuit against Guttormson. Oh, and not only that, he's also launched a new site, FaithWarrior.org where he insists that he's declaring "war" on "anarchy" and a variety of other things, including communism (he insists his critics are all communists), "faith bashing," "cyberbullying," "online harassment" and more.

Some people should not be allowed to own a computer.

Microsoft is downloading Windows 10 to your machine 'just in case'

Found on The Inquirer on Thursday, 10 September 2015
Browse Software

Microsoft has confirmed that Windows 10 is being downloaded to computers whether or not users have opted in.

"I know of two instances where people on metered connections went over their data cap for August because of this unwanted download. My own internet (slow DSL) was crawling for a week or so until I discovered this problem. In fact, that's what led me to it. Not only does it download, it tries to install every time the computer is booted."

Microsoft told us: "For individuals who have chosen to receive automatic updates through Windows Update, we help upgradable devices get ready for Windows 10 by downloading the files they’ll need if they decide to upgrade.

Forcing people to upgrade is a bad move. MS has annoyed users already with its adware "patch" KB3035583 and the emerging rumours about tracking and spying in Windows 10 don't help either. The problem for MS is that, as a solution, users might decide to just stop rolling in updates what in turn just feeds the army of infected zombie machines.

2600 accused of using unauthorized ink splotches

Found on 2600 on Wednesday, 09 September 2015
Browse Legal-Issues

We thought it was a joke for almost an entire day until one of us figured out that they were actually claiming our use of a small bit of ink splatter that was on one of their images was actionable.

You see, not only are they trying to get us to pay them for using a few ink splotches, but as it turns out, the ink splotches don't belong to them in the first place!

So not only is Trunk Archive trying to scare people into paying them for images, but they're apparently doing this for images they have absolutely no connection to.

Unless the entire field of copyrights gets a complete and sane reform (without the lobbying of the content industry), the trolling won't stop. This latest example underlines that Trunk/Ghetty doesn't even know who has the copyrights on the images they are using for their settlement suits and simply try to force payments from just everybody.