Lindows wins one against Microsoft

The U.S. District Court in Seattle ruled Wednesday that the jury in the case should "consider whether the Windows mark was generic" before Windows 1.0 entered the marketplace in 1985. It also said that even if the "primary significance" of the term is not generic today--that is, has been displaced by the proprietary use--the trademark is not necessarily valid.

Daniel Harris, Lindows' lead trial counsel, said in a statement that the win was a major blow to Microsoft. "The court's ruling confirms that a company, no matter how much money it spends, cannot buy a word out of the English language. These repeated filings by Microsoft are just another attempt to deplete our resources by dragging these legal proceedings on for as long as possible."

Microsoft, which hopes to ban the company from using its Windows-spoofing name, has had some court rulings go in its favor. For example, the Benelux injunction forced Lindows to stop selling or advertising its products, cancel all outstanding orders and stop users in the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Belgium from accessing its site.