Death to C, ++
Found on Techcrunch on Sunday, 16 July 2017

C has become a monster. It gives its users far too much artillery with which to shoot their feet off. Copious experience has taught us all, the hard way, that it is very difficult, verging on “basically impossible,” to write extensive amounts of C code that is not riddled with security holes.
If you’re a developer you already know where I’m going, of course: to tout the virtues of Rust, which is, in fact, a viable C/C++ replacement. Two years ago I suggested that people start writing new low-level coding projects in Rust instead of C.
Rust: 2010. C: 1972. Rust, a language powered by Mozilla, who somehow ended up turning a once fast Firefox Browser back into a bloated Netscape clone. A company who drops projects when they do not suit their business model (like Thunderbird) is not the perfect choice for creating a programming language that should replace practically most of the software. No language is secure by default; maybe the programmers just got worse? If there is no shiney new framework, many developers are out of luck.