Passport Privacy Protection? Nope

Found on Wired on Sunday, 28 November 2004
Browse Various

The Bush administration opposed security measures for new microchip-equipped passports that privacy advocates contended were needed to prevent identity theft, government snooping or a terror attack, according to State Department documents released Friday.

The ability to read remotely, or "skim," personal data raises the possibility that passport holders would be vulnerable to identity theft, the ACLU said. It also would allow government agents to find out covertly who was attending a political meeting or make it easier for terrorists to target Americans traveling abroad, the ACLU said.

Frank Moss, deputy assistant secretary of state for passport services, said the United States wants to ensure the safety and security of Americans traveling abroad.

The documents obtained by the ACLU show that information technology experts and countries including Canada, Germany, the Netherlands and Britain share the suspicion that the international standard set for the electronic passports inadequately protects privacy and security. The standards don't require that data be encrypted.

Now wait a second... the US always says it does everything to fight terrorism (in the bad bad emails, P2P and chats), and now it plans to ignore the safety and privacy of Americans. Somehow, those two ideas don't fit together. Now, if you replace "fight terrorism" with "monitoring people"... Welcome to George Orwell's 1984.