AOL's email tax row goes intergalactic

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 21 March 2006
Browse Internet

It's former "Net Queen", space cadet, and Register reader favorite Esther Dyson, whose latest transmission has been captured, decoded and published by the New York Times.

Well, as she explained in the Times on Friday, it unleashes the goodness of market forces. And the doubleplus emergent goodness of Darwinian evolution!

Instead, AOL and Yahoo! are endorsing a scheme which guarantees to deliver email to their subscribers only if the senders have paid an intermediary of their choice. Which happens to be GoodMail Systems.

Email sent from the rest of the world, which GoodMail considers "uncertified", must therefore risk running through AOL and Yahoo!'s discrimination process. And as this potential profit center for the two net giants takes off, there's no incentive for either company to deliver the "free email" - and every incentive for them to get the world conditioned to paying for guaranteed delivery.

It's as if the police began charging crime victims for the guarantee that they would log and investigate an incident. Do you think the crime figures would begin to rise or fall with the introduction of such an "innovation"?

When you earn on a dollar a day, paying a cent for send is not a trivial amount. (Let's put it this way, when Esther herself earned $10,000 a day for providing vacuities to ignorant dotcom companies, that would have worked out as $100 an email.)

"In my case," she says, "I'd have a list. I'd charge nothing for people I know, 50 cents for anyone new … and $3 for random advertisers. Ex-boyfriends pay $10."

I prefer getting spam instead of having a ISP who forces senders to pay up. Although the idea of getting money for receiving spam is interesting, it wouldn't change much. What's the point of having a spam folder if you need to check it because it might contain false positives? Besides, you can use whitelisting already; it will put email from accepted senders into your inbox, the rest into your spam folder. But that's something every user has to do, instead of letting senders pay the ISP.

Starforce enforces DRM by instant reboot

Found on CD Freaks on Monday, 20 March 2006
Browse Software

Despite all the problems DRM has been causing lately, it seems like companies involved in copy protection just keep trying to create more dangerous copy protections.

Now, Futuremark has uncovered a very dangerous anti-piracy system Starforce is now using. This copy protection system installs a driver that runs at the highest level of access on the system, which gives it low level access to the PCs hardware and any drivers and processes. This driver runs regardless of whether the game runs; keeping an eye out for any suspicious activity such as attempting to copy a protected disc. If something suspicious is detected, it forces the PC to make an immediate reboot, regardless of any other applications running and whether or not the user has any unsaved work.

To make matters worse, this copy protection interferes with DPM readings from software that is designed to allow the playback of copied game discs, which means that any game backups that rely on this Data Protection Manager will no longer play with the Starforce protection driver in place. Finally, as the Starforce protection has been found to interfere with certain device drivers, some drivers will run in legacy PIO mode instead of DMA, which not only slows down the PC by hogging CPU resources, but also slows down the data transfer to the affected hardware.

However, for those who get affected or lose several hours of unsaved work due to an unexpected reboot, chances are that they are not going to get any compensation or sympathy from Starforce or the game publishers using the copy protection.

Boycott. This is the only thing that helps. Don't buy anything that has to do with DRM; nothing else will convince companies that their are going the wrong way. It's even worse: they force people into filesharing. There is always someone who can make a working copy and shares it. And choosing between a paid version that cripples your system totally, and a free version that simply works isn't hard.

Tornado carried teen 1,300ft

Found on Ananova on Sunday, 19 March 2006
Browse Various

A US teenager may have set a new record after he was picked up and carried by a tornado for a quarter of a mile.

Matt, wearing only his boxer shorts, was hit and knocked out by a flying lamp before the tornado sucked him through the collapsing trailer walls.

Propelled by 150mph winds, he was hurled up into the air and flew over a barbed wire fence more than 200 yards away.

Matt eventually landed in soft grass in an open field, dazed and bleeding from the scalp wound, but otherwise intact.

"I've always told my girlfriend I wanted to see a tornado," he said. "But I sure didn't want to be in one."

A National Weather Service official used a GPS device to work out that he travelled 1,307ft.

What a twisted way of travelling.

Kinderstart sues Google over lower page ranking

Found on Reuters on Saturday, 18 March 2006
Browse Legal-Issues

A parental advice Internet site has sued Google Inc. (GOOG.O: Quote, Profile, Research), charging it unfairly deprived the company of customers by downgrading its search-result ranking without reason or warning.

Google could not immediately be reached for comment but the company aggressively defends the secrecy of its patented search ranking system and asserts its right to adapt it to give customers what it determines to be the best results.

KinderStart charges that Google without warning in March 2005 penalized the site in its search rankings, sparking a "cataclysmic" 70 percent fall in its audience -- and a resulting 80 percent decline in revenue.

At its height, KinderStart counted 10 million page views per month, the lawsuit said. Web site page views are a basic way of measuring audience and are used to set advertising rates.

The complaint accuses Google, as the dominant provider of Web searches, of violating KinderStart's constitutional right to free speech by blocking search engine results showing Web site content and other communications.

Everybody who relies on Google should quit doing business. It's not some official search engine who has to list you; it's just another company. Chances are very high that this other search engine got ranked down because of questionable practices. It looks like a PR gag to get some attention; after all, tons of news sites will probably link to them now, so they ranking will rise again.

Google ordered to release some search data

Found on PhysOrg on Friday, 17 March 2006
Browse Internet

Google has been ordered to turn over some data on sites in its popular search engine to the US federal government -- but only 50,000, far fewer than the government wanted, under a judge's ruling.

But he rejected the Justice Department's attempt to obtain more sensitive data that might disclose the online search habits of web users, noting that that could spark a possible "loss of good will" among its users.

Federal prosecutors sought the information as ammunition in a legal fight to revive an overturned 1998 statute making it a crime for websites to allow minors access to adult material online such as pornography.

The government wants the information to bolster an effort to resurrect the law, which it contends made it tougher for minors to access pornography on the Internet.

So, the Feds sued Google because some 14 year old teenage bloomers search online rumpy pumpy to learn by viewing? There must be a ton of excess resources; obviously, they already caught Bin Laden, established world peace and stopped all famines. This also brings up the question why Google stores this detailed information anyway.

Hot pepper kills prostate cancer cells in study

Found on AlertNet on Thursday, 16 March 2006
Browse Science

Capsaicin, which makes peppers hot, can cause prostate cancer cells to kill themselves, U.S. and Japanese researchers said on Wednesday.

Capsaicin led 80 percent of human prostate cancer cells growing in mice to commit suicide in a process known as apoptosis, the researchers said.

Lehmann estimated that the mice ate the human equivalent of 400 milligrams of capsaicin three times a week. That is about the amount found in three to eight fresh habanero peppers, depending on how hot the peppers are.

Habanero suppositories? It's pretty easy to understand why cancer cells commit suicide; I guess most of the patients will get similar ideas right after the treatment.

US Military Plans To Make Insect Cyborgs

Found on Spacewar on Wednesday, 15 March 2006
Browse Future

Facing problems in its efforts to train insects or build robots that can mimic their flying abilities, the U.S. military now wants to develop "insect cyborgs" that can go where its soldiers cannot.

The Pentagon is seeking applications from researchers to help them develop technology that can be implanted into living insects to control their movement and transmit video or other sensory data back to their handlers.

In an announcement posted on government Web sites last week, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, says it is seeking "innovative proposals to develop technology to create insect cyborgs," by implanting tiny devices into insect bodies while the animals are in their pupal stage.

The objective is to transform the insects into "predictable devices that can be used for various micro-UAV missions requiring unobtrusive entry into areas inaccessible or hostile to humans."

I don't mind when they fiddle around with robots, but abusing a living being is disturbing. This blurs the line between animal and object.

RFID tags can be infected with a virus

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 14 March 2006
Browse Software

A group under the guidance of Andrew Tanenbaum at the Amsterdam Free University made the world's RFID "malware" publicly available. "We hope to convince the experts that the problem is serious and better be dealt with," the Dutch researchers say.

As RFID chips only have a limited memory capacity, it was widely assumed they could not become infected with a virus, but researchers discovered that if certain vulnerabilities exist in RFID software a RFID tag can be (intentionally) infected with a virus, which could infect the backend database used by the RFID software. From there it can easily spread to other RFID tags, researchers explained today at the Annual IEEE Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications in Pisa, Italy.

One possible target could be airports. From May 2006, RFID tags at Las Vegas Airport will be attached to suitcases to speed up the baggage handling process. If someone attaches an infected RFID tag to these cases, the entire system could be disrupted, researchers warn.

As you can see, nothing is secure.

Microsoft to hide Irish Tax Haven data

Found on Finfacts on Monday, 13 March 2006
Browse Various

US software giant Microsoft has taken steps to shield from the public, the value of Tax Haven transactions of two Irish-registered subsidiaries that have enabled it to save billions of dollars in US taxes.

The company applied to the Irish Companies Office on Monday to re-register its Round Island One and Flat Island Company subsidiaries as companies with unlimited liability. Unlimited companies have no obligation to file their accounts publicly.

The move to change the legal status of the subsidiaries follows a November 2005 report in The Wall Street Journal and weeks after the US Treasury Department said it was developing new rules to prevent US groups transferring intellectual property and patents abroad as a way of minimising their exposure to US tax.

Microsoft's effective global tax rate fell to 26 percent in its last fiscal year from 33 percent the year before. Nearly half of the drop was attributed to "foreign earnings taxed at lower rates," Microsoft said in a Securities and Exchange Commission August filing. Microsoft leaves much of its profit in Ireland, including $4.1 billion in cash, avoiding U.S. corporate income taxes. But it still can count this profit in its earnings.

You only need to play big. If you try to re-route some of your hard earned money, the tax office tries to get you for tax evasion.

Bill Could Restrict Freedom of the Press

Found on Slashdot on Sunday, 12 March 2006
Browse Censorship

"The Washington Post is carrying an article about a disturbing Senate bill that could make it illegal to publicly disclose even the existence of US domestic spying programs (i.e. NSA wiretaps)." An aide to the bill's author assures us it's not aimed at reporters, but the language is ambiguous at best. From the article: "Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, said the measure is broader than any existing laws. She said, for example, the language does not specify that the information has to be harmful to national security or classified. 'The bill would make it a crime to tell the American people that the president is breaking the law, and the bill could make it a crime for the newspapers to publish that fact,' said Martin, a civil liberties advocate."

If this is a reply to yesterday's article (the Chicago Tribune uncovered 2,653 CIA employees and identified facilities) it sure was quick. The laws get more and more restrictive; this might very well end up in a police state, where saying the wrong word brings you to court.