Virginia Judge Denies RIAA Ex Parte Motion

Found on Recording Industry vs The People on Friday, 13 July 2007
Browse Legal-Issues

n Interscope v. Does 1-7, an ex parte proceeding in the Eastern District of Virginia, in Newport News, Virginia, in a 5-page decision by Judge Walter D. Kelley, Jr., the Court denied the RIAA's ex parte motion for an order granting discovery into the identities of students at the College of William & Mary.

This is the second such ex parte motion of which we are aware that has been denied recently, the first being Capitol v. Does 1-16, in which the RIAA sought information about University of New Mexico students.

It's about time that judges realize that the industry is abusing the system.

Google Still Using E.U. Data Retention Ruse

Found on Wired on Thursday, 12 July 2007
Browse Internet

Google's Global Privacy Counsel Peter Fleischer continues to mislead the public about why Google keeps detailed logs on its customers searches and internet activity.

Google's policy is a complicated beast that keeps personally identifiable logs for all of its services globally 18 months, at which time Google attempts to anonymize the data by losing a few digits of the IP addresses of entries in the logs.

But let's reiterate: There is no United States or E.U. law that requires Google to keep detailed logs of what individuals search for and click on at Google's search engine. It's simply dishonest to continually imply otherwise in order to hide the real political and monetary reasons that Google chooses to hang onto this data.

Google is keeping the data because its engineers love mining the data and because holding onto the data makes law enforcement agencies happy. How often do law enforcement agents or lawyers in divorce cases show up at Google HQ with subpoenas?

For instance, it could stop issuing cookies to anonymous users that last for decades.

For instance on the user sign-up page, Google currently automatically enrolls users in to a system that records and analyzes everything they do on the Web, with zero explanation that the "feature" involves recording, in perpetuity, every url visited while logged into their Google account.

That's why people should use Google as what is was designed to be: a search engine (of course with blocked cookies, but that should be clear). All Google products should be treated with a lot of suspicion. It may be sad to say so, but it's Google's own fault for ignoring privacy.

Sony BMG sues CD software firm

Found on Hollywood Reporter on Wednesday, 11 July 2007
Browse Legal-Issues

Sony BMG Music Entertainment is suing a company that developed antipiracy software for CDs, claiming the technology was defective and cost the record company millions of dollars to settle consumer complaints and government investigations.

The music company accuses Amergence of negligence, unfair business practices and breaching the terms of its license agreement by delivering software that "did not perform as warranted."

It began including MediaMax on some of its compact discs in August 2003 and shipped about 4 million CDs equipped with the technology in 2005.

The program restricted the number of copies of a CD that a user could make. Some users reported problems when the CDs were played on their computers.

The fallout over the copy-protected CDs sparked lawsuits and investigations.

First they order it, then they sue them because customers realized that Sony screwed them. Funny world.

Google hack creates peer-to-peer network

Found on CNet News on Tuesday, 10 July 2007
Browse Internet

A video posted to YouTube in April offers a primer on how to use Google to pilfer music and video files in less time than it takes to download them from a peer-to-peer service.

The how-to video focuses on what is known as an "index of" search and shows users how to direct Google's search engine to locate files from unprotected computer systems, many of which are found on college campuses. University students around the country often store music on their schools' computer networks.

Ruska's formula also worked at Yahoo and other search engines, according to the FT. Record labels have always maintained that downloading unauthorized music files violates copyright law.

It's disapointing that CNet thinks this is something new; it's so old that it has a beard already. Johnny listed it long ago, but it looks like everything that's old automagically turns into something new as soon as someone posts it on Youtube. And it's not a "hack" and not a "peer-to-peer network". Otherwise every search would be hacking the Internet, and every website visit would be P2P sharing; it's just the basic usage of Google. I can already see the next breaking news: "Reverse gear detected! Watch the Youtube instructions to see this amazing hardware hack for cars!".

Spammers defeat Captchas

Found on CNet News on Monday, 09 July 2007
Browse Internet

According to security vendor BitDefender, spammers have defeated a system designed to differentiate humans from machines when registering new accounts online. Known as Captcha (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart), the system won't allow users to advance until distorted characters in a box are correctly entered. BitDefender says a new threat, Trojan.Spammer.HotLan.A, is using more than 15,000 automatically generated bogus Microsoft Hotmail accounts to spread, and is registering 500 new accounts per hour, suggesting the Captcha system has been defeated.

This isn't really really something that should be filed under "breaking news". Captcha-security has been breached quite some time ago, as most PHPBB admins might know. A quick search for PWNtcha brings up lots of results dealing with defeating captchas. Fixing broken captachs is just a temporary improvement, not a solution (in case of PHPBB, it helps a lot if you adjust the grayscale values to reduce the difference between background and text). Perhaps it's about time to replace the current approach of identifying text. For humans, it's easy to answer questions about a picture, like "how many people do you see?" or "what color has the car?". Of course the visitor has to be able to understand the language. This should be a minor point; not too many would sign up with a site they can't read.

Music licensing companies come calling

Found on Florida Today on Sunday, 08 July 2007
Browse Various

The performers, normally duos, mainly covered songs written and made famous by other musicians. There was no cover charge, no pay for the musicians, no limit to how long patrons could sit on a couch with their coffee, playing chess and enjoying the music.

Then a few months later, music industry giant ASCAP started calling and sending letters saying East Coast Coffee & Tea was in violation of copyright laws. The fee to continue the music was $400 a year.

Six months later, other music copyright companies began calling the Halls and demanding money. Most days there would be three or four phone calls from each company, Hall said.

When a songwriter signs with one of the licensing companies -- the country's three biggest are BMI, SESAC and ASCAP -- his or her music is copyrighted.

"It started 15 years ago when I had a guy come out to our other place, Cantina dos Amigos, and play Mexican music on his guitar on the patio," Andrus said. "They came after me for money. Are they really sending royalty checks to the songwriter in Mexico?"

The article itself has too many interesting and disturbing points to quote them all, so make sure to visit the site and read it completely. However, the article is wrong in one point (either that, or the companies give out false informations what would be in their favor): nobody has to sign with any company to have a work copyrighted. "Under the Berne Convention, copyrights for creative works do not have to be asserted or declared, as they are automatically in force at creation: an author need not 'register' or 'apply for' a copyright in countries adhering to the Berne Convention." (Source: Wikipedia). Licensing companies only exist to manage royalties for an artist; they don't control copyrights at all. If an artist would decide to take care of royalties by himself, his works would still be copyrighted. Of course companies don't like to hear that, since it makes it easier if everybody thinks that they have control over copyrights.

Chinese Officials Break 1-Child Policy

Found on PhysOrg on Saturday, 07 July 2007
Browse Politics

Nearly 2,000 officials in central China's Hunan province have been caught breaking China's strict one-child policy, state media reported Sunday.

Xinhua said the officials were caught between 2000 and 2005 by the provincial family planning commission and included 21 national and local lawmakers and 24 political advisers.

China has about 1.3 billion people, 20 percent of the world's total. The government has pledged to keep the population under 1.36 billion in 2010, and under 1.45 billion in 2020.

But rising incomes mean some newly rich can afford to break the rules and pay resulting fines. In April, the government said it would crack down on rich lawbreakers with bigger fines.

A little game of "Do as they say,don't do as they do".

Swedish Police to Block Pirate Bay

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 06 July 2007
Browse Censorship

The Swedish Police just can't seem to leave The Pirate Bay at bay. It's been a year and two months since the worlds largest torrent tracker, The Pirate Bay, was originally raided and shut down by police, and now they're at it again, but with claims of child pornography. Brokep, over at The Pirate Bay (TPB), got a 'heads up' from a friend that the Swedish Police are going to put the site on its porn filter blacklist; this means anyone who tries to access the site from Sweden will get redirected to another site with a message explaining that they are not allowed to visit child pornography sites.

Since raiding them didn't work, officials now try the usual "please think of the children" approach. That's a slap into the face of those who really fight against child pornography and don't just see it as a shady excuse for blocking a service that makes the media industry angry.

University boffins squeeze 500GB onto a DVD

Found on The Register on Thursday, 05 July 2007
Browse Hardware

The University of Berlin, with partners Budapest University of Technology and Economics and Universita Politecnica delle Marche in Italy, has managed to work out how to store 500GB of data on a regular HD DVD or Blu-ray disc.

The Microholas project developed a microholographic recording technique, using nanostructures inside the disk rather than on the surface as in conventional optical storage systems.

By applying wavelength multiplexing techniques to multi-layer disc structures, very high storage densities can be achieved, Professor Susanna Orlic told German site Pressetext. The 500GB prototype has 50 data-storage layers.

Orl said the technology has the potential to store one terabyte (1TB) of data.

Now that's more like it. DVD's which can only hold a few GB of data are pretty much useless. Those 500GB versions would come in handy for my backups.

MPAA's Media Defender sets up 'fake' site

Found on Tech Blorge on Wednesday, 04 July 2007
Browse Filesharing

The site, MiiVi.com, complete with a user registration, forum, and "family filter", offers complete downloads of movies and "fast and easy video downloading all in one great site." But that's not all; MiiVi also offers client software to speed up the downloading process. The only catch is, after it's installed, it searches your computer for other copyrighted files and reports back.

ZeroPaid, acting on a tip from The Pirate Bay, found MiiVi to be registered to Media Defender using a whois search. Shortly after, the registrar information was changed, but the address still reflects Media Defender's address at 2461 Santa Monica Blvd., D-520 Santa Monica, CA 90404.

Not 10 hours after the site was found to be registered to Media Defender, the site went dead.

Your fault if you sign up at unknown new sites and install some funky software that promises to miracously boost your download.