Official HD DVD obituary a matter of days

Found on Ars Technica on Saturday, 16 February 2008
Browse Technology

On Friday, rumor spread fast that Toshiba was about to bail on HD DVD, following a string of unhappy news for the HD DVD camp, beginning with Netflix and Best Buy's decisions to throw their weight behind Blu-ray earlier in the week.

The loss of Warner Brothers demoralized the HD DVD camp, and when it was clear that deep price cuts weren't going to give HD DVD a second wind, the writing was on the wall.

Toshiba and its partners are concerned to show that they have plans that can minimize the financial damage resulting from the shutdown, presumably to keep shareholders happy. But the damaging announcements from Best Buy, Netflix and Wal-Mart have forced an acceleration of the company's plans.

And there was not much rejoicement amongst those who already bought HD DVD hardware.

BitTorrent Developers Introduce Encryption

Found on Torrentfreak on Friday, 15 February 2008
Browse Filesharing

Several BitTorrent developers have joined forces to propose a new protocol extension with the ability to bypass the BitTorrent interfering techniques used by Comcast and other ISPs.

When the first ISPs started to throttle BitTorrent traffic most BitTorrent clients introduced a countermeasure, namely, protocol header encryption.

Unfortunately, protocol header encryption doesn’t help against more aggressive forms of BitTorrent interference, like the Sandvine application used by Comcast. A new extension to the BitTorrent protocol is needed to stay ahead of the ISPs, and that is exactly what is happening right now.

So, the new tracker peer obfuscation technique is especially designed to be a workaround for throttling devices, such as the Sandvine application that Comcast uses.

Quod erat expectandum. Comcast couldn't honestly think that they would be able to uphold this throttling for long. They merely put up roadblocks; now P2P is starting to drive around them.

Printer Tracking Dots May Violate Human Rights

Found on EFF on Thursday, 14 February 2008
Browse Hardware

Tracking dots are the secret marks that many popular color laser printers and photocopiers scatter across every document they touch. The marks, almost invisible to the eye, uniquely identify the printer that produced the document, and, as EFF uncovered, can even automatically encode the time and date it was created.

It turns out that the European Commission, the executive wing of the EU (whose members include many former Eastern Bloc states), shares these concerns.

Given that including tracking systems in printers appears to be a U.S. government policy, how hard does the EU plan to pressure their ally for change in its secret agreements with printer manufacturers? Is the United States sharing its knowledge of how to decode these dots with individual EU nations' governments? And if so, what other governments, authoritarian or not, know the secret of tracking their citizens' publications?

I bet that's made to "fight terrorism" too; like everything these days.

Gunman opens fire at US college

Found on BBC News on Wednesday, 13 February 2008
Browse Various

A gunman has opened fire on students at a university near Chicago in the United States, wounding at least 15 people.

The shooting took place at Northern Illinois University, in De Kalb, 65 miles (100 km) west of Chicago.

Several people have been taken to hospital with serious head wounds. University officials say police confirm that the gunman killed himself.

Last Friday, a woman shot dead two fellow students before killing herself e at Louisiana Technical College in Baton Rouge. In Memphis, Tennessee, a 17-year-old is accused of shooting and critically wounding a student on Monday, and a 15-year-old was shot at a junior high school in California on Tuesday.

No Happy Valentine for at least someone. Luckily, it looks like nobody is dead so far (except the gunman).

Comcast Defends Internet Practices

Found on Wired on Tuesday, 12 February 2008
Browse Internet

Comcast Corp. told the Federal Communications Commission in formal comments Tuesday that hampering some file-sharing by its subscribers was a justifiable way to keep Web traffic flowing for everyone.

Comcast says it must curb some file-sharing traffic because some subscribers would otherwise hog the cables with their uploads and slow traffic in their neighborhood.

The company - the country's second-largest Internet service provider - also said it was justified in using "reset" packets to break off communications between two computers.

Comcast sometimes inserts these packets in the data stream to kill a file-sharing session. The move "fools" each computer into believing the other computer wants to end the connection.

Of course, play the "blame P2P" card. Comcast should just admit that it's selling more bandwith than it can provide. If a bunch of users who saturate the bandwith they pay for(!), then your business idea is flawed. Comcast relied on the opinion that users will never make full use of the bandwith they give them. Comcast wants users to pay for the advertised bandwith/flatrate and cut them off if they actually do use it to the fullest.

Illegal downloaders 'face UK ban'

Found on BBC News on Monday, 11 February 2008
Browse Internet

People in the UK who go online and illegally download music and films may have their internet access cut under plans the government is considering.

A draft consultation suggests internet service providers would be required to take action over users who access pirated material via their accounts.

The Times suggested that broadband firms which failed to enforce the rules could be prosecuted, and the details of customers suspected of making illegal downloads made available to the courts.

Technology that allows internet providers to monitor what content is being downloaded is becoming more effective, said James Bates, media director at consultants Deloitte.

The industry keeps on pushing legislators to make others work for them now that their "sue everybody" strategy fails. Essentially, that's like trying to make a law that forces your postman to sniff through your mail to search for illegal content. But then there's always encryption, TOR and open wireless. I imagine quiet a few would take this chance, hop on someone's network and disconnect them that way.

The Pirate Bay: No Drop in Danish Traffic

Found on Slyck on Sunday, 10 February 2008
Browse Filesharing

The IFPI (International Federation of the Phonographic Industry) fired some of the first shots earlier this week in Denmark. One of Denmark's most prominent ISPs, Tele2, was forced by a court decision to block The Pirate Bay from their customers.

According to The Pirate Bay's new Court Blog, Danish traffic has not dropped since the implementation of the block.

"...the number of visits from Denmark has increased by 12% thanks to IFPI," the blog post reads. "Our site http://thejesperbay.org is growing more because of the media attention than people actually coming to learn how to bypass the filter - our guess is that alot of the users on the site now run OpenDNS instead of the censoring DNS at Tele2.dk."

The Jesper Bay, a spin off of The Pirate Bay, provides users with detailed instructions on how to bypass the block. Using the OpenDNS option has proven so far to be the most popular method.

Seriously, DNS level blocking? You don't even need OpenDNS to get around that. Just get PirateBay's IP from one of the online traceroute tools (or simply visit dnsstuff.com) and put that information into your hosts file. Voila.

Scientology protests start across Australia

Found on News.com.au on Saturday, 09 February 2008
Browse Censorship

A global day of protest against the Church of Scientology organised by internet group "Anonymous" began today with demonstrations outside the church's Australian offices.

The protestors, who said they had worn masks to remain anonymous and prevent possible legal action or retribution from the church, chanted "Church on the left, cult on the right", "Religion is free" and "We want Xenu".

In a statement released this afternoon, the Church of Scientology's Oceania branch condemned the actions of Anonymous and described the group as "cyber-terrorists".

"Anonymous is perpetrating religious hate crimes against Churches of Scientology and individual Scientologists for no reason other than religious bigotry," the statement said.

Anti-Scientology demonstrations in Perth, Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide were promoted from a blog called "anonaustralia" which offered flyers people could download and print to hand out at the demonstration and suggested attendees wear masks.

"Cyber-terrorists"? "Religious hate crimes"? LOL, BAAWWWWWW. They are the last ones who should talk about crimes, because Scientology kills.

XP needs to live until 2009

Found on The Inquirer on Friday, 08 February 2008
Browse Software

Currently, the Vole plans to switch off the life support on XP in June even though the patient is not dead and is probably getting better.

Burton Group service director Richard Jones told Infoworld that in any operating system transition, you need to have the original and new products running side by side for a couple of years.This gives punters a chance to do a decent migration.

Jones added that the Vole had been a little too aggressive because it took too long to release Vista and this deprived it of cash. However, it was making users pay for its mistake, he said.

There was a chance that Microsoft would see customers abandoning Windows rather than being forced to move to Vista.

All I've heard and seen from Vista so far doesn't make me want to give it a try even. It's just a sinking ship and MS should drop it, trying to create something decent.

RIAA boss: Move copyright filtering to users' PCs

Found on Ars Technica on Thursday, 07 February 2008
Browse Computer

Sherman's a sharp guy, and he's fully aware that filtering will prompt an encryption arms race that is going to be impossible to win... unless users somehow install the filtering software on their home PCs or equipment.

This means moving the filter out of the network and onto the edges (local machines), since it's at the edges that decryption and playback occurs.

Sherman knows it's a tough sell. "Why would somebody put that on their machine?" he asked rhetorically. "They wouldn't likely want to do that."

The only way to make it work is to mandate the filters or have ISPs mandate that users install them to get on the Internet. The consumer backlash from such a plan would be like the force of a thousand supernovas, and it's hard to visualize this happening.

Nobody would install it. The industry might talk MS into it, but this won't work on an open source OS like Linux (in fact, it would be a good PR). Even if for some reason the ISPs would be able to force users to install the filter, the protocol can be reverse-engineered to create fake filter applications that basically do nothing but pretend to be a valid filter if checked. To avoid that, filtering would have to be protected by law and that sounds a bit off (for now).