The Android fine print: Kill switch and other tidbits

Found on Computerworld on Wednesday, 15 October 2008
Browse Hardware

In the Android Market terms of service, Google expressly says that it might remotely remove an application from a user's phone.

Google says that if it does remotely remove an application, it will try to get users their money back, a question that iPhone users have wondered about in the case of an iPhone application recall.

Looks like today every company thinks it needs to play nanny. Having a central point of control isn't really helping; in fact, it's counterproductive. Imagine someone releases an application which creates an anonymous network (by eg porting TOR), or a P2P application (like a torrent client) or an encryption software (like TrueCrypt). Now imagine a court rules that application illegal, because it allows (you've guessed it) child pornography, copyright violations or hindering law enforcement (by encrypting your terroristic plans). Then Google could be forced to remove all such installations.

No opt-out of filtered Internet

Found on Infoworld on Tuesday, 14 October 2008
Browse Censorship

Australians will be unable to opt-out of the government's pending Internet content filtering scheme, and will instead be placed on a watered-down blacklist, experts say.

"Labor's plan for cyber-safety will require ISPs to offer a clean feed Internet service to all homes, schools and public Internet points accessible by children," Marshall said.

"Illegal is illegal and if there is infrastructure in place to block it, then it will be required to be blocked -- end of story."

"Once the public has allowed the system to be established, it is much easier to block other material," Clapperton said.

I'm so sick of the "think of the children" story. If you want to protect only them, make an opt-in list for parents and schools. But treating every citizen as an imbecile and criminal won't help. I don't welcome the Communistic Republic of Australia. It's like Potter Stewart said: "Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime".

Sarah Palin ordered to preserve Yahoo! emails

Found on The Register on Monday, 13 October 2008
Browse Politics

Superior Court Judge Craig Stowers ordered Alaska's attorney general to recover messages contained in a Yahoo email account maintained by Palin.

Friday's court order follows revelations that the Alaska governor has conducted email discussions concerning official state business from a Yahoo email address.

Critics say her use of email accounts outside of the state's official system violate open government laws that require such communications to be available to members of the public.

Members of the Bush administration has also been accused of using private accounts to send emails conducting official White House business.

More recently, Vice President Dick Cheney's office has acknowledged that an entire week's worth of email is missing from White House archives.

Either governments lose confidental data which is not meant to be public, or it loses data which is meant to be preserved. Why is there no law which not only requires politicians to abide the rules, but also makes them lose all their positions if they do? Something like a "one strike and you're out" rule.

Bush signs RIAA-backed intellectual-property law

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 12 October 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

The Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act establishes within the executive branch the position of intellectual property enforcement coordinator, who will be appointed by the president.

The law also steepens penalties for intellectual-property infringement, and increases resources for the Department of Justice to coordinate for federal and state efforts against counterfeiting and piracy.

Good to know that your tax money is spent on hunting students who download some music, right?

Speculation laptop use caused Qantas flight plunge

Found on Sydney Morning Herald on Saturday, 11 October 2008
Browse Hardware

Air safety investigators say it is too early to blame passenger laptop computers for causing a Qantas jet to abruptly nose dive on a flight from Singapore to Perth.

The mid-air incident resulted in injuries to 74 people, with 51 of them treated by three hospitals in Perth for fractures, lacerations and suspected spinal injuries.

Laptops could have interfered with the plane's on-board computer system, it has been reported.

Laptops which change the altitude, wireless mice which change the course, cell-phones which cause everything from A-Z. Who is making up those excuses? And even if this is really true, why didn't someone think of the basic concept of shielding? Furthermore, why would the internal system of a plane react to common wireless signals? I think a simple socket in the cockpit to plug in your maintenance laptop is not fancy enough today.

Google satellite sends back first snaps

Found on The Inquirer on Friday, 10 October 2008
Browse Astronomy

The high-resolution color image from GeoEye-1, which was launched on September 6, was of Kutztown University campus in Pennsylvania.

While the fact that the satellite is being used by Google is getting all the attention, GeoEye-1's main client is the US government's mapping arm, the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency. GeoEye-1's government client will receive higher resolution photos than commercial clients such as Google.

Now let's see the next lawsuits about privacy violations coming. It'll take some time for Google to learn that it cannot simply do everything they want.

Accused Palin hacker has a history of intrusion

Found on ComputerWorld on Thursday, 09 October 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

Kernell, 20, was charged Wednesday with one felony count of accessing a protected computer for allegedly breaking into the private Yahoo e-mail account of Palin, the Republican vice-presidential candidate.

The other incident allegedly occurred around 2000, when Kernell was in the seventh grade. Kernell and an accomplice guessed the password to a server used to store teaching materials at the school and were able to log on to the system, McDaniels said.

It's sad. Today you're already a hacker when you can guess a password. No wonder movies with plots like "bad guy uses 'evil' as password" are successful. Years ago, the password "12345" made a good joke in Spaceballs; today, people take it serious. Consequently, the school and Palin should be prosecuted for weak passwords (and Palin for illegally using private e-mail for government business).

Florida Primary Recount Reveals Grave Voting Problems

Found on Wired on Wednesday, 08 October 2008
Browse Politics

A month of primary recounts in the election battleground of Palm Beach County, Florida, has twice flipped the winner in a local judicial race and revealed grave problems in the county's election infrastructure, including thousands of misplaced ballots and vote tabulation machines that are literally unable to produce the same results twice.

There's just too much to quote, so visit Wired and read the entire article. It's somewhat amazing how a company tha fails to create working hardware can stay in business. With every recount, results were different. You may as well cancel the votes and just roll a dice.

Gmail Helps Stop Your Drunken E-mail Rants

Found on Webmonkey on Tuesday, 07 October 2008
Browse Various

Google's Gmail Labs has a new experimental featured dubbed "Mail Goggles" which will attempt to prevent you from sending out those ill-advised late night e-mails.

Gmail developer Jon Perlow created Mail Goggles as a kind of e-mail sobriety test. It works by stopping your message when you hit send and then presents a series of simple math problems you need to solve before you really send the e-mail.

The goggles! They do nothing! Seriously, this is as useful as a pimple on the butt. If you get drunk enough to send out embarrassing e-mails, then deal with the results or reconsider your consumption of alcohol. But then, it seems that alcohol addiction is nothing rare amongst Google employees.

Hollywood Illegally Demands Money From Kindergartens

Found on TorrentFreak on Monday, 06 October 2008
Browse Various

The Motion Picture Licensing Company (MPLC), which is charged with collecting royalties for the big studios, recently wrote to 2,500 kindergartens (or playschools as they are known in Ireland), informing them that it is illegal for the kids there to watch DVDs without an appropriate license.

The MPLC actually failed to register with the Irish Patent Office, and by demanding payments in the way they have, breached the 2000 Copyright Act. A spokesman from the IPO confirmed that an organization that acts in this manner could be fined or have its staff jailed.

Low, lower, music industry.