YouTube Limits Cookie Tracking on White House Website

Found on PhysOrg on Thursday, 22 January 2009
Browse Internet

With the launch of President Obama's White House website, three days ago, there has been extensive use of YouTube videos on the site. As we all know Google now owns YouTube and tracks every visitor that lands on the YouTube website or plays a YouTube video.

By Thursday evening the White House website replace the YouTube video player with an image of their own player.

There is really no good reason for Google to track White House website visitors who choose to watch a video that was produced by the White House staff and paid for by the taxpayers.

Cookies? You mean those annoying little pieces which people should have been blocking for years by now? Not to forget the even more annoying Flash cookies, which aren't handled by browsers. But a quick change of write permissions to the directory #SharedObjects solves that too.

From A Weekend Musician, To Making $4.2 Million...

Found on Techdirt on Wednesday, 21 January 2009
Browse Various

Corey Smith was a high school teacher, doing weekend music gigs. Then, apparently, his manager had a revelation and started giving all of his music away for free: and last year Corey brought in $4.2 million. And the music industry is complaining that if the government doesn't step in creative content will cease to exist?

However, as an experiment, they took down the free tracks from Corey's website for a period of time last summer... and sales on iTunes went down.

But, still, the real money maker for Corey is concerts, and even here he's doing something innovative: making concert tickets cheap: $5.

Of course the music industry will continue to complain. And the reason for that is obvious: they are not involved with Corey Smith; he and his manager do the work. That doesn't leave a lot of money in the hands of the greedy industry. So for them, this example cannot work. Supporting this would be suicide for them.

RIAA Fears 'Manipulation' of Courtroom Web Broadcast

Found on Wired on Tuesday, 20 January 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

The RIAA claims that the re-runs "will be readily subject to editing and manipulation by any reasonably tech-savvy individual."

"Petitioners are concerned that, unlike a trial transcript, the broadcast of a court proceeding through the internet will take on a life of its own in that forum," the RIAA wrote (.pdf) the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. "The broadcast will be readily subject to editing and manipulation by any reasonably tech-savvy individual. Even without improper modification, statements may be taken out of context, spliced together with other statements and broadcast (sic) rebroadcast as if it were an accurate transcript. Such an outcome can only do damage to Petitioner's case."

Now wait, so it's easier to edit a live video stream than a plain text transcript to make fun of them? Besides that, they should have realized by now that they damage themselves just perfectly; there's no need for someone else to do that. Sure, someone could come up with a funny version of the video, but nothing could damage my image of them even more. Well, the RIAA can and I'm sure they will take this chance to do so.

Native Lizards Evolve to Escape Attacks by Fire Ants

Found on PhysOrg on Monday, 19 January 2009
Browse Nature

Penn State Assistant Professor of Biology Tracy Langkilde has shown that native fence lizards in the southeastern United States are adapting to potentially fatal invasive fire-ant attacks by developing behaviors that enable them to escape from the ants, as well as by developing longer hind legs, which can increase the effectiveness of this behavior.

In the future, Langkilde plans to study the mechanism behind the behavioral changes following invasion. Non-responsive lizards tend to be killed and removed from the gene pool.

Darwinism in action. Take that, creationists.

RIAA Really Does Not Want Live Broadcast Of Hearing

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 18 January 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

It seems the RIAA is, once again, showing its true colors. When Charlie Nesson asked the court in the Tenebaum case to allow a live internet broadcast of a hearing to dismiss the case, the RIAA protested.

It turns out that the RIAA is so against the idea that it's gone and asked an appeals court to overturn the ruling, which even has entertainment industry lawyers who support the lawsuit strategy questioning the RIAA's move here.

That's not the "education of the public" they've been talking about all the time? This is a perfect chance for the RIAA to prove their legal points, to teach viewers how bad piracy is, how easily you can get caught and how devastating the effects of your wrongdoing are. Of course, this will only work if their points have a solid base to stand on; otherwise, they'd be forced to appeal the ruling... Oops.

Demon ends porn-less Internet Archive block

Found on The Register on Saturday, 17 January 2009
Browse Internet

British ISP Demon Internet is no longer blocking access to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, after working in tandem with the IA to correct a "technical issue" with its child-pornography filter.

The IWF soon confirmed that its blacklist contains at least one image hosted by the Wayback Machine.

Way to go. Why not cut off all users from the Internet? That way, they can be sure they won't look for kiddies. Seriously, do something about the producers and dealers; those browing for it are the smallest problem and will vanish when the production is stopped. But it takes way less effort to block a few pages and claim victory.

Report Claims 95% of Music Downloads Are Illegal

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 16 January 2009
Browse Filesharing

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) press release claims that 95% of music file downloads in 2008, an estimated 40 billion files, were illegal.

Collating separate studies in 16 countries over a three-year period, IFPI estimates over 40 billion files were illegally file-shared in 2008, giving a piracy rate of around 95 per cent.

I hope nobody missed that one word: estimates. So, in other words, they guessed it. An honestly, if you have to pick a percentage which will be used to support your reasoning for knee-shooting customers legally, then you will make sure to pick a good number. So, you have to take this little report with more than just a grain of salt. Update: The IFPI says that 18% of the Internet users share music. So the remaining 82% buy the 5% music that's not shared and the 18% share 95% of the music? Oh please, if you make up numbers, at least try to be plausible.

RIAA Hearing Next Week Will Be Televised

Found on Slashdot on Thursday, 15 January 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

One commentator labels it 'another fly in the RIAA's ointment.' In SONY BMG Music v. Tenenbaum, the Boston, Massachusetts, RIAA case in which the defendant is represented by Harvard law professor Charles Nesson and a group of his students, the Judge has ruled that the hearing scheduled for January 22nd will be televised over the Internet.

Sounds like something worth to be watched.

Germany Legislates For Mandatory Web Filters

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 14 January 2009
Browse Censorship

Germany's Minister for Families has announced a legislative initiative to force ISPs to implement a government-mandated block list (in English), which will be updated daily.

As usual, this is being brought in under the 'fight child porn' guise. The minister is quoted as saying: 'We must not water down the problem' in reply to being challenged that this law and technology could be used to censor other content. She then went on to say: 'I can't know what wishes and plans future governments will develop.'

I so hate those political idiots who blur out statements like that. There's no place where hosting child porn is legal, so if you find a server, write to the ISP and it goes offline. Censorship won't help those kids; it will only stop people from looking at it via your everyday browser session. Pedophiles (not the "oops I saw a pic" but the serious ones) have moved to encrypted networks and darknets long ago. Now guess if such a list can stop them? Right, it can't. They won't even notice it. So, the politicians are doing nothing to help children or protect them from abuse. In fact, they make it worse for them because they want to make it look like there is none. But the nice uncle from across the road won't stop just because a few websites are blocked. And we've seen how reliable those lists are when Wikipedia and Wayback got listed.

Botnets Landscape Changes as Spammers Get Back

Found on eWEEK on Tuesday, 13 January 2009
Browse Internet

Spammers have been hard at work at regaining their past momentum. Over the past year, the botnet landscape has changed, especially since the McColo shutdown.

Some of the former kings of the hill, botnets such as Srizbi, were badly hurt by the shutdown.

Depending on whom you ask the amount of spam declined 50 to 70 percent in the wake of the McColo shutdown in November.

Since killing McColo was so effective, perhaps the guys from Spamhaus and SecureWorks could continue to keep an eye on bullet-proof hosters.