Microwave weapon will rain pain from the sky

Found on New Scientist on Wednesday, 22 July 2009
Browse Technology

The device is an extension of its controversial Active Denial System, which uses microwaves to heat the surface of the skin, creating a painful sensation without burning that strongly motivates the target to flee.

"Independent of the mode of production, with this size of antenna the beam will show variations of intensity with distance - not just a simple decrease - up to about 500 metres," says Altmann. Shooting it on the move with any accuracy will be difficult, he adds.

And they said tinfoil hats are useless. Just add a ground wire to it and feel safe in any riot. Also, always wear your safety goggles before looking upwards.

Mission possible: researchers make online text self-destruct

Found on Ars Technica on Tuesday, 21 July 2009
Browse Software

Their scheme, called Vanish, encrypts the message, and then essentially throws away the key. The trick is that the key will take a set amount of time before disappearing from view; during that time, it's still possible to access the data.

Because the online storage system purges data after set periods of time, once that time is up, the key is permanently lost. In essence, the message has self-destructed.

This message will self-destruct in three, two, one. Gone. Now that super-secret text is gone for good. I'm so glad I made a screenshot of it (or just copied and pasted it). The idea isn't bad, but I bet some users might think that it will take care of the security they should apply. Vanish is a tool, not a solution to non-existent security precautions.

Most expensive javascript ever?

Found on Opera on Monday, 20 July 2009
Browse Software

Management put a hefty check on the table - I'm sure our beloved sysadmins felt like kids before Christmas - and salivating sales people from major hardware vendors grabbed our requirements spec, dived into their CRMs and crunched their spreadsheets.

However, one of the world's biggest hardware vendors - whose name every single reader will be familiar with, and whose hardware a good share of you will be using right now - apparently didn't do their homework. When Opera's sysadmin booted up the server to test its web-based administration interface, they came across a single JavaScript statement that managed to piss off everyone up to and including the CTO.

My guess is Dell. That's the only hardware vendor I'd pick. Sure, they might be huge and lots of people use their desktops (some even use their servers), but I sure won't. Dell is out of question when it comes to hardware. Their systems may work, but their service is just awful. They sent Mr Bicycle Repair Man from India (no kidding) to the datacenter who decided to switch a production server offline for hours just for some random testing, when the cause for the error was already known. After lots of nerve-wrecking phone calls and visits to the DC, they replaced the whole system; although just a memory module was faulty.

Checked Your CD-Rs Lately?

Found on Techarp on Sunday, 19 July 2009
Browse Hardware

According to manufacturers, CD-Rs should last for decades. Some even quoted an upper limit of 120 years based on accelerated aging tests! That sure is a long time, isn't it? But will CD-Rs really last that long?

Of the corrupted CD-Rs, many of them only had a few files corrupted, but two of the CD-Rs were completely unreadable. Neither one of the two CD/DVD drives we used could even recognize the CD-Rs, much less read anything off them.

It should be pretty obvious by now - CD-Rs don't last forever. Although manufacturers may quote lifespans of decades in length, they are unlikely to last more than a few years. Our simple test showed that even when stored properly, CD-Rs that were just 7-9 years old were failing at a significant rate.

It baffles me that people still use CD/DVD. I used CDs too when HD space was expensive, but learned my lesson when trying to get the data on them back. Although stored in a dark place with constant temperature and well protected from any dust, there had been a lot of failures. Some disks just had a few I/O errors, others failed completely because the layer oxidized at the edges. After that, I trashed all CDs (a blowtorch is a fast way to destroy everything before throwing them away). I don't even have a CD drive connected anymore and never missed it; and that was years ago. Why would anybody bother with that useless medium when it's cheaper to get another (external) harddrive? Not to mention it's faster and you don't need to search through a pile of CDs to find what you want.

Lost backpacker was 'total idiot'

Found on Ananova on Saturday, 18 July 2009
Browse Various

Jamie Neale, 19, told Australia's 60 Minutes television programme that he was "a total idiot" to venture unprepared into the Blue Mountains, 60 miles west of Sydney.

He said he ate seeds and weeds, and kept warm at night under strips of bark. He waved his blue shirt at circling helicopters, but the forest was so thick that he was not seen.

Two hikers happened upon Jamie last Wednesday. He spent two days in the hospital for treatment of dehydration and exposure.

Yes, Australia is not the UK. At least it knocked some common sense into an overconfident youngster. Even when you feel like you can easily conquer the world, a simple jungle may be your end just as easily.

Pirated copies of Orwell books pulled from Kindle

Found on PhysOrg on Friday, 17 July 2009
Browse Various

Users of Amazon.com's e-reader device were surprised and unsettled over the past day to receive notice that George Orwell works they had purchased, including "1984" and "Animal Farm," had been removed from their Kindle and their money refunded.

Herdener's explanation differed from what Kindle users were told by Amazon's customer service, which made no reference to piracy, but implied that the removal was the publisher's choice.

It's as if someone from your next door shop breaks into your house, takes whatever you bought the day before and leaves the money you paid. In the end, you don't have any financial loss, but the whole thing is pretty questionable. If I buy something, I want complete control over it; and that includes the decision to copy it, keep it or delete it when I want.

Norton Internet Security 2010 beta in pictures

Found on Cnet News on Thursday, 16 July 2009
Browse Software

Norton Internet Security 2010 won't be available for a few more months, but the beta version is available now.

Built upon the dramatic performance improvements are deeper integration with other security tools like OnlineFamily.

What? The worst resource hog ever is still alive?

Tattooed Swedish devil girls sexually molest cyclist

Found on The Register on Wednesday, 15 July 2009
Browse Pranks

Swedish cops are on the look-out for a quintet of tattooed girls who dragged a 50-year-old man off his bicycle, pulled down his trousers and smalls and "sexually molested" the poor bloke.

Having had their evil way, the five assailants made good their escape. The man was "not otherwise beaten or physically assaulted".

I've heard a lot of guys now consider visiting Sweden to "hunt down" those evil outlaws.

BlackBerry update bursting with spyware

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 14 July 2009
Browse Various

An update pushed out to BlackBerry users on the Etisalat network in the United Arab Emirates appears to contain remotely-triggered spyware that allows the interception of messages and emails, as well as crippling battery life.

Closer examination (as reported by itp.net) seems to indicate that all instances of the application were expected to register with a central server, which couldn't cope with the traffic - thus forcing all the instances to repeatedly attempt to connect while draining the battery.

Perhaps malware authors will shift to the mobile sector and leave the rest of the PC users alone. However, I admit that I do have doubts about that though.

Wikipedia Debates Rorschach Censorship

Found on Slashdot on Monday, 13 July 2009
Browse Various

The 10 inkblot images that form the classic Rorschach test have fallen into the public domain, and so including them on Wikipedia would seem to be a simple choice. However, some editors have cited the American Psychological Association's statement that exposure of the images to the public is an unethical act, since prior exposure to the images could render them ineffective as a psychological test.

Ethical reasons? That's something I haven't seen much lately in global politics. Anway, putting those blobs online isn't that much of a problem. After all, they only show fire and slaughtered people.