Tougher US air screening for 'terror-prone' countries

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 02 January 2010
Browse Various

Reports say people flying from Nigeria, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Yemen and Cuba will have pat-down body searches and have carry-on baggage searched.

The Transportation Security Administration said in a statement that the new rules apply to passengers flying from or through countries on the US State Department's "State Sponsors of Terrorism" list - Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria - and "other countries of interest".

As a terrorist leader, I now would call a sleeper from one of my cells inside the US and tell him to suicide bomb a central subway station during rush hour. Everybody is concentrating on airports and the news headlines would be something like "Officals were so not expecting this".

Irish atheists challenge new blasphemy laws

Found on The Guardian on Friday, 01 January 2010
Browse Censorship

The new law, which was passed in July, means that blasphemy in Ireland is now a crime punishable with a fine of up to €25,000 (£22,000).

The justice minister, Dermot Ahern, said that the law was necessary because while immigration had brought a growing diversity of religious faiths, the 1936 constitution extended the protection of belief only to Christians.

God damn it. Are we going to see burning witches on marketplaces next year? I thought this was 2010, not 1020.

New internet piracy law comes into effect in France

Found on BBC News on Thursday, 31 December 2009
Browse Politics

Illegal downloaders will be sent a warning e-mail, then a letter if they continue, and finally must appear before a judge if they offend again.

The judge can impose a fine, or suspend their access to the internet.

The law was backed by President Nicolas Sarkozy and the entertainment industry.

Good thing this law comes into effect now instead of last year; otherwise, Sarkozy (or several members of his staff) would have had to appear before a judge and explain why they infringed on copyrighted music, mass-pirated DVDs and violated the copyright of another song. In the first case, they used a song although the request was rejected by the label because it didn't wanted it to be used for political purposes, then they made 400 illegal copies of a documentary (they even replaced the name of the original publisher) and in the third case, they relased a video without getting permission to use the music in it. All that goes way beyond the filesharing they try to fight: their actions show real criminal streaks. So, let's just be fair and fine or kick them off the Internet. Égalité, wasn't there something like that?

MySpace Replaces Embedded Imeem Playlists With Ads

Found on Wired on Wednesday, 30 December 2009
Browse Internet

MySpace has replaced Imeem songs and playlists embedded on blogs and elsewhere on the web with advertisements for generic ringtones and the MySpace Music service.

Now, thousands of independent artists are not being paid money they're owed and countless posts on Listening Post and elsewhere on the web feature not Imeem's songs or playlists, but rather advertisements like the ones pictured to the above right.

The best solution would have been to remove all Imeem lists as soon as Myspace took over. Nothing good ever came from Myspace and it was just a matter of time until the new aquisition gets turned into a shipwreck too.

GSM Encryption Cracked... GSMA's First Response? That's Illegal!

Found on Techdirt on Tuesday, 29 December 2009
Browse Technology

The big news in security circles this week is the fact that a security researcher claims to have cracked the encryption used to keep GSM mobile phone calls private.

"This is theoretically possible but practically unlikely," said Claire Cranton, an association spokeswoman. She said no one else had broken the code since its adoption. "What he is doing would be illegal in Britain and the United States. To do this while supposedly being concerned about privacy is beyond me."

Did she just say everything is ok because cracking GSM is illegal so nobody will do that? I hate to point it out, but the whole world is bigger than the UK and US (even if they don't want to admit that). Furthermore, breaking encryption that was meant to protect privacy is a pretty big problem for said privacy in my opinion. To sum it up: she has no clue what she is talking about.

SoundExchange Claims To Open Up

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 28 December 2009
Browse Various

Why the government has granted exclusive rights to this industry group to collect and distribute money to musicians is troubling enough. But it's made worse by the fact that if SoundExchange "can't find" musicians to give the money to, it gets to keep the money.

As we've seen over and over again, many of these collections societies use sampling and counting methods that greatly overvalue big stars (who need the money less) at the expense of up-and-coming artists.

Of course it's not really interesting to search for someone to give money to if you're allowed to keep it as long as you can't find that person. Only a lobbied (bribed) politican can come up with support for such an idea.

Torrent Search Engines Unlawful, U.S. Judge Says

Found on Wired on Sunday, 27 December 2009
Browse Internet

The long-awaited decision, while not unexpected, was the first in the United States in which a federal judge found that BitTorrent search engines are an unlawful avenue (.pdf) to free movies, music, videogames and software.

Fung, in an e-mail, said his sites should be protected by safe-harbor provisions of the copyright law, which immunize search engines from infringement liability if they promptly remove works when a rights-holder notifies them to take down infringing content.

So now Google is officially unlawful, because that's the torrent search engine that's used the most. The additional search parameter "filetype:torrent" comes in handy when looking for something.

New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?

Found on CNet News on Saturday, 26 December 2009
Browse Various

Passengers are reporting that new restrictions are in place, and their severity varies flight to flight. Among the reports: No electronics allowed.

The New York Times is reporting that no one will be able to move from their seats during the last hour of flight. That means no bathroom breaks, no accessing carry-on luggage, nothing.

So you can't even play video games to distract yourself from how badly you have to pee.

I think the terrorists have scored. The current security precautions have been thwarted by a single person, leaving officials embarrassed and proving that there is no total security. Now happens what everybody was expecting: more restrictions. From what is known so far, this wouldn't have hindered Umar Farouk at all since he was in his seat and used a lighter. I'm awaiting the day when "flight-suits" are mandatory and need to be put on under official monitoring; your clothes will be locked up safely and returned to you once you've landed.

Nigerian accused of attacking US passenger jet

Found on BBC News on Friday, 25 December 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

A Nigerian man has been charged with attempting to destroy a plane after he allegedly tried to detonate a bomb on a passenger jet arriving in the US.

Mr Abdulmutallab reportedly told investigators he had links to al-Qaeda and had received the explosives in Yemen.

A preliminary investigation found that security procedures were followed correctly, and the man had a valid US visa.

A black person, trained by Al-Qaeda in Yemen, who is on a list of people having significant terrorist connections got a valid visa and went through all security checks even though his parents warned officials before. This leaves the US security officials with the reddest face ever; but at the same time, they will demand more rights for privacy violations to increase the monitoring of everybody, not realizing that there will always be someone who can get through.

Big Bro 'sought amputee soldiers'

Found on Ananova on Thursday, 24 December 2009
Browse Various

It said army charities had been contacted by Endemol, the production company behind the Channel 4 show, asking for case studies of homeless or injured troops.

Annabelle Fuller, of the Army Benevolent Fund, told the newspaper: "We're a charity, not a selection box for bad TV programmes. The people we help are often vulnerable."

Commander John Muxworthy, of the UK National Defence Association, added: "How anyone could even attempt to try to take advantage of these people and their suffering is staggering."

It's even more surprising and shocking that people watch that show. Even after just one minute your brain starts to hurt really bad and you start to imagine all the things you want to do to the producers and whoever came up with the idea. Out of all the crap that's on TV, this show takes the crown for being the worst. By far.