Intel's Sandy Bridge processors have a remote kill switch

Found on Techspot on Saturday, 18 December 2010
Browse Hardware

Intel's new Sandy Bridge processors have a new feature that the chip giant is calling Anti-Theft 3.0. The processor can be disabled even if the computer has no Internet connection or isn't even turned on, over a 3G network.

While a given stolen netbook, laptop, or desktop can no longer be turned on if Intel's new kill switch is flipped, there's nothing stopping the thief from taking out the HDD and putting it in another computer.

What could possibly go wrong? It's not like Intel would set a default password like '12345', right?

Judge kills massive P2P porn lawsuit, kneecaps copyright troll

Found on Ars Technica on Thursday, 16 December 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

Ken Ford, the lawyer behind the Adult Copyright Company, has just had his business model chopped off at the knees; not only did Judge John Preston Bailey dismiss every defendant but one in Ford's mass lawsuits, he also demanded that each case be filed separately and that Ford only submit IP addresses likely to map to West Virginia Internet users.

In a series of orders today that cover all seven of Ford's initial September cases, the judge "severed" every defendant but one. If Ford wants to proceed against all these people, he can do so individually and pay the $350 per case filing fee. (For the cases severed yesterday, this would amount to $1.8 million in filing fees alone.)

That should stop quite a few trolls who planned to try the same; it also sends a nice signal to the industry.

BPI: 1.2 billion illegal music downloads in 2010 a record

Found on Ars Technica on Wednesday, 15 December 2010
Browse Filesharing

This bit of data comes courtesy of a new report released by UK recording industry group BPI, which says that the music industry is growing slower than it should thanks to the lack of action against downloaders.

The group says that the industry's growth is being hurt because of the lack of consequences for those illegally downloading music files.

Same old arguments as ever. Refusing to acknowledge that their way of doing business is dying. That's the old story they've been telling for years. This is a good proof that stricter laws won't change anything; P2P will continue to grow and find new ways. At least they didn't also claim that every download is a lost sale this time. 1.2 billion would sound a bit off; but knowing them, they would probably claim 12 billion in losses, because the customer of course would have bought the album if he only wanted a single song.

McDonald's hacked and customer data stolen

Found on Techspot on Tuesday, 14 December 2010
Browse Various

McDonald's servers were recently compromised and hackers were able to get access to customers' e-mail addresses, names, addresses, phone numbers, birth dates, genders, as well as certain information about their promotional preferences and Web information interests.

McDonald's did not disclose how many people were impacted by the hack.

What's more scary is the fact that people actually hand out personal information to a fast food chain. They should be forced to eat MacD food for the rest of their lives.

Zuckerberg beats Assange to claim Person of the Year

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 14 December 2010
Browse Censorship

Julian Assange came in third, behind the Tea Party, the chaotic but influential agglomeration of US right wingers.

Time said the Facebook founder deserved its award "for connecting more than half a billion people and mapping the social relations among them; for creating a new system of exchanging information; and for changing how we all live our lives".

Wikileaks connected the rest of the world to the US government. The Time magazine bluntly ignored their reader's choice, who voted Assange as #1. They not only ignored, but also removed him from the voting list but, pro forma, listed him as #3 in the final results; after the Tea Party that is. Effectively this means that the Time does not care about reader opinions at all; Assange was ahead of Erdogan (by roughly 150,000 votes), ahead of Obama (by almost 14 times as many votes) and way, way ahead of Zuckerberg (who got a whopping 4.8% of the votes compared to Assange). Quite sad for a magazine which supports media oppression through governments with that choice.

Data leak embarrasses Colorado sheriff, terrifies informants

Found on Ars Technica on Monday, 13 December 2010
Browse Various

A database leak in Mesa County, Colorado has left the personal information of 200,000 people in jeopardy. And not just any 200,000 people - these are suspects, victims, and informants working with the sheriff's department to out other criminals.

According to the Associated Press, the employee had copied over the database in the form of a giant text file with everyone's information available in plaintext, assuming that the target server was secure.

Police, along with the FBI and Google (apparently thanks to Google's Web crawler, which indexed the data), are now working to figure out who could be in jeopardy thanks to the leak.

The target server may have been secure, but since Google's bot indexed the file it is pretty obvious that the employee parked the data in a web-accessible directory. Perhaps even with the totally unsuspicious and hard to guess filename "secret.sql". This leak was not a matter of security, but a clear lack of brain. One simply does not store unencrypted confidental data in an Internet-facing location.

The US's Reaction To Wikileaks Is Doing A Lot More Harm

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 12 December 2010
Browse Politics

So far, most of the reaction from various politicians and diplomats concerning the actual content of the documents was that some of it might be slightly embarrassing, but there's been nothing all that surprising.

We're still hearing claims that Julian Assange needs to be put on trial or (worse) executed, and other forms of "attacks" should be made on Wikileaks itself.

This will make it much, much harder any time the US tries to stop any form of censorship in other countries, as they'll immediately point back at how many of our politicians flipped out over Wikileaks.

Double standards. There's a difference between "freedom for everybody" and "freedom for everybody except when we don't like it".

PayPal releases WikiLeaks' funds

Found on TNW on Saturday, 11 December 2010
Browse Various

In a reversal of course, PayPal has released funds remaining in an account associated with WikiLeaks according to a post on PayPal's blog.

Last week, a statement from PayPal indicated, the company had suspended the account following claims by the U.S. that the activities of WikiLeaks violated the law.

Now it appears attacks from the supporters of WikiLeaks have caused PayPal to re-think their position.

PayPal returns money they confiscated? Somehow it feels like I've seen everything now.

Wikileaks protests in Spain over Julian Assange arrest

Found on BBC News on Friday, 10 December 2010
Browse Politics

Protests have taken place across Spain calling for the release of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, who is facing extradition from the UK to Sweden for alleged sexual offences.

The demonstrators believe Mr Assange's detention is politically motivated.

Our correspondent says the issue of freedom of speech is sensitive for Spaniards, who only emerged from four decades of authoritarian rule in the 1970s.

The cat is out of the bag. The US (and other governments too) should take the chance, open up more and clean up the mess they have produced.

Key Lawmakers Up Pressure on WikiLeaks

Found on Wired on Thursday, 09 December 2010
Browse Politics

"The WikiLeaks data dump has jeopardized U.S. national interests and the lives of intelligence sources around the world," Lieberman said, though there is no proof or even detailed allegations that the release has endangered any intelligence source.

Lieberman has also called for the Justice Department to look into whether the New York Times should be charged with a crime for its reporting and re-publishing of some of the cables.

I'm only waiting for the next leak of documents about Lieberman. I wonder what dirty secrets he has to hide. Transparent governments, that's what every politican promises to get elected; but when things get transparent, they lash out and demand the execution of those who released the truth. Sorry, this is not China. Move to Mao-land if you want to get your daily fix from the abuse of power.