Signalling dissent

Found on The Economist on Friday, 18 March 2011
Browse Internet

With a tin can, some copper wire and a few dollars' worth of nuts, bolts and other hardware, a do-it-yourselfer can build a makeshift directional antenna. A mobile phone, souped-up with such an antenna, can talk to a network tower that is dozens of kilometres beyond its normal range (about 5km, or 3 miles).

Some activists brought laptops to places like Tahrir Square in Cairo to collect, via short-range wireless links, demonstrators' video recordings and other electronic messages. These activists then broadcast the material to the outside world using range-extending antennae.

Directional antennae, unlike the omnidirectional sort, transmit on a narrow beam. This makes it hard for eavesdroppers to notice a signal is there.

Censorship will never work. Sure, the government can try and block quite a bit of information, but the interesting parts still make it through.

Libya's Gaddafi given ultimatum

Found on BBC News on Thursday, 17 March 2011
Browse Politics

Earlier, the Gaddafi regime announced it had stopped fighting with the rebels, and promised to follow the UN security council resolution.

Col Gaddafi has ruled Libya for more than 40 years. An uprising against him began last month after long-time leaders of neighbouring Tunisia and Egypt were toppled.

Just a few days ago, Gaddafi said he will never give in to any threats from other nations and instead join forces with his current enemy, Al-Qaida, who he blames for the revolution. Now, basically hours after the ultimatum was given, he practically rolled over.

The NYT paywall arrives

Found on Felix Salmon on Wednesday, 16 March 2011
Browse Internet

The website is free, so long as you read fewer than 20 items per month, and so are the apps, so long as you confine yourself to the "Top News" section. You can also read articles for free by going in through a side door.

If you want to read the NYT on both your smartphone and your iPad, you'll need to buy both digital subscriptions separately, and pay an eye-popping $35 every four weeks. That's $455 a year.

If you want to use the NYT's iPad app, you're marginally better off subscribing to the print newspaper on Sundays and throwing it away unread.

There must have been a whole bunch of clueless people at work. So you get some free stories per month, but how are they planning to monitor how much you've read? By logging my IP? I'm on DHCP, oops. By placing a cookie? My browser blocks them, oops. Plus, if you consider a static IP being personal information, then you suddenly enter the realms of privacy laws.

Twitter Supports HTTPS Encryption to Bolster Security

Found on eWEEK on Tuesday, 15 March 2011
Browse Internet

Users now have the option to choose the application security setting to always use HTTPS when accessing Twitter.com.

Twitter's latest security move comes after the Federal Trade Commission finalized the settlement with the microblogging site to establish a rigorous information security policy to protect user accounts.

1. Enable the most obvious security only under pressure
2. Call it a huge improvement
3. ???
4. Profit

White House wants new copyright law crackdown

Found on CNet News on Monday, 14 March 2011
Browse Politics

The White House is concerned that "illegal streaming of content" may not be covered by criminal law, saying "questions have arisen about whether streaming constitutes the distribution of copyrighted works.

Under federal law, wiretaps may only be conducted in investigations of serious crimes, a list that was expanded by the 2001 Patriot Act to include offenses such as material support of terrorism and use of weapons of mass destruction. The administration is proposing to add copyright and trademark infringement.

The administration is proposing that if Homeland Security seizes circumvention devices, it be permitted to "inform rightholders," "provide samples of such devices," and assist "them in bringing civil actions."

Hooray, pirates are terrorists now. This doesn't actually help much; it only makes the law look more ridiculous.

Steam user violates subscriber agreement, loses $1,800 in games

Found on Ars Technica on Sunday, 13 March 2011
Browse Various

The user in question, who has a total of $1,794.52 worth of games on his or her Steam account, decided to ask how much another person might pay for such an account.

That was a month ago. A little more than a week ago the user was unable to connect with Steam, and was later informed that the account had been disabled for violating the Steam Subscriber Agreement.

Valve has since posted on its forum that the account has been re-activated.

That's why it's better to buy games on CD. It is obvious that companies like Valve hate it that consumers are allowed to sell their used CD's because they imagine there's a "lost sale". Having control over the games allows them to bully the users by claiming that some TOS was violated; a TOS which would probably not withstand a test in front of a court. It's pretty much as if they storm into your house and take your CD's away because you put them up for sale.

Operation Twitstorm: Devs as friends or foes

Found on The Register on Saturday, 12 March 2011
Browse Software

Sarver's message says apps that replicate Twitter's "core functionality" are no longer welcome, but those that extend that functionality are.

From the app developers' point of view the new rules are a not-so-subtle "get lost". Their argument runs like this: we put together thousands of Twitter applications, many or most of them for free, and Twitter's ridden to success on our backs.

You, dear Twitter user, are only valuable in two roles: as the uncomplaining recipient of corporate, endorsed, API-compliant advertising, or as yet-another end user filling up a data mine.

It's amazing how much hype this 140 character bubble got. Sarver can't really do much against those who waste their time developing tools. Should he limit the API; devs can always make use of the HTTP protocol to access it. He could turn of HTTP too; that would probably be the best solution.

Retroactive Drug Monopoly Raises Rates From $10... To $1,500

Found on Techdirt on Friday, 11 March 2011
Browse Various

The product has been on the market for years, and normally costs about $10 per dose... but thanks to the new monopoly, the price is immediately jumping up to an astounding $1,500 per dose -- and this is something that many pregnant women need around 20 doses of during their pregnancy.

They thought that granting a monopoly to one company would mean that it would make the drug "more available."

Who would have thought that granting a monopoly for a possibly life-saving drug would increase the price? Really, sometimes the blindness of people amazes me.

Major quakes hit Japan; tsunami warning for U.S.

Found on CNet News on Thursday, 10 March 2011
Browse Various

An 8.9-magnitude earthquake and series of major tsunamis struck Japan on Friday, causing massive damage, triggering evacuations in several countries, and leading to tsunami warnings for Hawaii and the West Coast of the United States.

The death toll has been climbing, and Nikkei reported that Miyagi prefecture police said they'd found 200 to 300 bodies of people believed killed by the tsunami.

Television images of Japan on CNN showed waves exceeding 12 feet flowing inland (see video below), causing massive damage and carrying along cars, boats, and small buildings.

Also fire. Yes, on the flood there were burning houses floating around.

Google Lets Users Blacklist Sites From Search Results

Found on Wired on Wednesday, 09 March 2011
Browse Internet

Google is giving users the ability to block sites that annoy them from ever showing up again in their search results, via a new link next to search results.

"In addition, while we're not currently using the domains people block as a signal in ranking, we'll look at the data and see whether it would be useful as we continue to evaluate and improve our search results in the future."

It's surprising that Google hasn't introduced this already years ago. It's a simple, buf efficient concept: let humans sort out the spam. On the other hand, Google most likely makes a nice profit from Adsense on spam sites too.