Disappearing test cases or did another part of MySQL just become closed source?

Found on The MariaDB Blog on Saturday, 18 August 2012
Browse Software

One of the changes that 5.5.27 brings in an extension to the mysql-test-run script — the driver script of the mysql-test suite — which makes it look for test cases in a new directory. In addition to the usual location (that is, the mysql-test/ directory in the source tree), it will now look for test cases in the internal/mysql-test/ directory. Does this mean that test cases are no longer open source? Oracle did not reply to my question. But indeed, there is evidence that this guess is true. For example, this commit mail shows that new test cases, indeed, go in this “internal” directory, which is not included in the MySQL source distribution.

It’s difficult to find anything more valuable to external developers than test cases. But arguably the revision history is. And it seems that Oracle is going to keep this information to itself too. Public MySQL trees on launchpad with the revision history are not being updated.

One would think that Larry has learned a lesson or two from the great fiascos by killing OpenSolaris and trying to get control of OpenOffice. If he really thinks that each and every MySQL installation out there is a lost sale for Oracle then he's one of the biggest retards out there. Messing with MySQL will just create something like OurSQL, NoracleSQL or LibreSQL.

EBay Bans Magic Potions, Curses, Spells

Found on ABC News on Friday, 17 August 2012
Browse Internet

Beginning Aug.30, the online auction site will ban the sale of curses, spells, hexes, magic, prayers, blessing services, magic potions, healing sessions and more.

“Disgusted” wrote: “Ebay bans alternative religious items. But! Not for Christians. Holy water and other sundry ‘holy’ items are discriminately allowed. … Hm. Let me get this straight. Some guy in Rome wearing long robes can wave his hand over some water and imbue it with something, and then it’s very ‘powerful?’ How is that different from any other magical item previously sold on ebay?…”

Actually that's a very good question.

Ecuador Grants Assange’s Request for Asylum, Defying UK Threats

Found on Wired on Thursday, 16 August 2012
Browse Politics

“Ecuador requested some guarantees from Sweden that he wouldn’t be extradited to the U.S., and they rejected any commitment in this sense,” Patino said.

The decision from Ecuador comes a day after officials claimed that UK authorities threatened to raid the Ecuadorean embassy to nab the WikiLeaks leader if the country didn’t hand over the fugitive.

On Thursday, Patino expressed outrage over the unprecedented threat and said that the UK had no right to interfere in the right of an individual to request asylum and the right of Ecuador as a sovereign nation to grant that asylum. No country, he said, had the right “to blackmail or threaten in any way” the sovereignty of any other country.

Quite a few politicians in the US and Sweden will wonder if all this is really worth it. It's so obvious that they only try to help the US to get Assange on american territory.

Germany: Facebook must destroy facial recognition database

Found on Ars Technica on Wednesday, 15 August 2012
Browse Internet

German data protection officials today accused Facebook of “illegally compiling a vast photo database of users without their consent” and demanded that the social network destroy its archive of files based on facial recognition technology, the New York Times reported.

Facebook claims it doesn’t have to do that, in part because the data collection is legal in Ireland, where Facebook’s European operations are based. “We believe that the Photo Tag Suggest feature on Facebook is fully compliant with EU data protection laws,” Facebook said in a statement issued to the Times.

So what if it is legal in Ireland? Ireland does not represent the EU and we have learned before that, when the sides are exchanged, the local law suddenly is very important. Remember AllOfMp3? It was perfectly legal under russian law. Or Rojadirecta. Legal under spanish law. What about Megaupload? The company has been killed, probably without ever being in front of a court.

Surfthechannel owner sentenced after piracy conviction

Found on BBC News on Tuesday, 14 August 2012
Browse Legal-Issues

The owner of Surfthechannel.com - a site that provided links to illegally copied TV shows and films - has been sentenced to four years in jail.

Surfthechannel.com had acted as an index of professionally made online videos - both legal and illegal - encouraging its users to send in new links and check that they worked.

However, it did not host the video files itself, but instead pointed visitors to other sites including Megavideo and China's Tudou.

He was arrested after Fact and the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America) hired a private investigator who took photographs of Mr Vickerman's home and computer equipment in July 2008 after pretending to be interested in buying the property.

The UK must feel really awesome for being a good little puppet in the hands of US lobbying groups.

Kim Dotcom pressing on with Megabox music service plans

Found on The Register on Monday, 13 August 2012
Browse Internet

In a pair of Twitter posts on Monday, Dotcom suggested that both Megabox and an unnamed additional service would launch "this year."

Last December, Dotcom described Megabox in a guest post for TorrentFreak as a service that would allow recording artists to sell music downloads direct to consumers and keep 90 per cent of the earnings.

If that happens, and if the rumours about being raided because he planned such a service are true, the entertainment industry's plan to stop artists from being independant has failed.

How YouTube Will Escape Google’s New Pirate Penalty

Found on Search Engine Land on Sunday, 12 August 2012
Browse Internet

Google has announced that it will soon penalize sites that are repeatedly accused of copyright infringement. But one site in particular doesn’t need to worry: Google’s own YouTube. It has a unique immunity against the forthcoming penalty.

Since Google doesn’t seem to disclose the number of YouTube takedown requests it has acted upon (I have asked for a figure), there’s no way to assess YouTube against the other sites on the strikeout list above.

There’s no way to treat YouTube — or Blogger — like any other site in the search rankings, when those sites have special takedown forms that don’t allow their alleged infringing activity to measured up against other sites.

As expected. Google of course won't do anything which harms the ranking of sites owned by them. Claiming that Youtube is different is in no way a valid excuse; if that's the case, just remove Youtube completely and let users search directly on the video site. Right now Google is just dancing around because with the undoubtly large amount of takedown requests, Youtube (and probably Blogger too) would be on top of the list, facing a removal from the search results (yes, pages are "only" ranked down, but people rarely go past page 4 or 5, so it's effectively a removal).

Privacy snafu as TOPLESS Mark Zuckerberg picture leaks online

Found on The Register on Saturday, 11 August 2012
Browse Internet

It appears to have leaked online after it was uploaded to Facebook by the director of engineering Andrew Bosworth and (presumably mistakenly) set to allow for public viewing. It was deleted "seconds later," according to the anonymous donor, but not before they had scraped a copy and published it online via Imgur.

As we often hear from Facebook itself, users must take responsibility for what they share online.

Oh the irony. Not even Facebook engineers can use the privacy controls correctly.

An update to our search algorithms

Found on Google Inside Search on Friday, 10 August 2012
Browse Internet

Starting next week, we will begin taking into account a new signal in our rankings: the number of valid copyright removal notices we receive for any given site. Sites with high numbers of removal notices may appear lower in our results.

In fact, we’re now receiving and processing more copyright removal notices every day than we did in all of 2009—more than 4.3 million URLs in the last 30 days alone.

Yeah, I can see no way in which this could go wrong. Just watch the news and you'll stumble over invalid DMCA notices which are issued to fight competitors or to execute a form of censorship. There's really something wrong with the whole business that has grown around the topic of copyrights when over the last three years, removal notices have grown by a factor of at least 365. Oh and I am sure that Google will happily kick Youtube off the search results since that page receives tons of valid DMCA takedown requests every single day.

Court: Feds Can Spy On Americans Without Warrants With No Legal Repurcussions

Found on Techdirt on Thursday, 09 August 2012
Browse Legal-Issues

The court actually ruled that the feds violated wiretapping laws, but then there were questions of what the court could actually do about it. It turned into a wrist slap for the government, with it being ordered to pay $20,400 to each of the two lawyers who represented Al-Haramain.

That got overturned. The appeals court has basically said that even though Congress passed a law that said the feds could not eavesdrop on Americans without a warrant, it didn't waive sovereign immunity rights for the government, which lets the government basically wave away any lawsuits. And thus, the government can ignore wiretapping lawsuits -- even in the one and only case where there's clear evidence of it violating the law.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes in what's more and more turning into a police state?