Fear the Reaper: Man hospitalised after eating red hot chilli pepper

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 10 April 2018
Browse Nature

The 34-year-old was rushed to an emergency room in New York after developing "excruciating" pain from eating the Carolina Reaper, according to a report in the British Medical Journal this week.

According to Paul Bosland, professor of horticulture at New Mexico State University and director of the Chile Pepper Institute, has said the grub can theoretically cause death, but in most cases people's bodies "would react sooner and not allow it to happen".

Dragon's Breath was created by a farmer for the Chelsea Flower show and is so potent that it had to be kept in a sealed container when it went on display.

Up to a certain level chillis are good, but at some point they turn into an impossible feat.

“Erotic Review” blocks US Internet users to prepare for government crackdown

Found on Ars Technica on Monday, 09 April 2018
Browse Censorship

SESTA will make it easier to prosecute websites that host third-party content that promotes or facilitates prostitution, even in cases when the sex workers aren't victims of trafficking.

But the site's FAQ noted that "TER is not alone in responding to this threat to your First Amendment Rights: Craigslist has pulled all of its Personal Ads, Reddit has closed a number of Subreddits, and sites such as CityVibe and Men4RentNow have gone completely dark. Other websites have taken or are expected to take similar actions."

Prude America just turned it up a few notches.

Facebook a big contributor to the committees in Congress that will question Mark Zuckerberg

Found on USA Today on Sunday, 08 April 2018
Browse Internet

Members of the committee, whose jurisdiction gives it regulatory power over Internet companies, received nearly $381,000 in contributions tied to Facebook since 2007, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Of the 55 members on the Energy and Commerce Committee this year, all but nine have received Facebook contributions in the past decade.

Plus, nearly 30 members of Congress own Facebook stock, according to a story in Roll Call, including two Democratic members of the committee who will question Zuckerberg next week.

The deeper you dig, the uglier it gets. Just go out and buy your politician too.

Facebook sent a doctor on a secret mission to ask hospitals to share patient data

Found on CNBC on Saturday, 07 April 2018
Browse Internet

Facebook has asked several major U.S. hospitals to share anonymized data about their patients, such as illnesses and prescription info, for a proposed research project. Facebook was intending to match it up with user data it had collected, and help the hospitals figure out which patients might need special care or treatment.

It also has a growing "Facebook health" team based in New York that is pitching pharmaceutical companies to invest its ample ad budget into Facebook by targeting users who "liked" a health advocacy page, or fits a certain demographic profile.

With more and more nasty details emerging, it would be a good idea to have a closer look at the secret projects Facebook as running behind the curtains as this is probably just the tip of the iceberg.

Facebook admits Zuckerberg wiped his old messages—which you can’t do

Found on Ars Technica on Friday, 06 April 2018
Browse Internet

Facebook has been quietly deleting old messages from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg out of their recipients' Facebook Messenger inboxes, the company has acknowledged. This isn't an option available to ordinary users.

Zuckerberg has a history of having old, embarrassing instant messaging conversations come back to haunt him.

With ever-increasing scrutiny into Facebook's business practices, it's not hard to see why Zuckerberg would want to minimize his paper trail.

Cleaning up the embarrassing old postings? Now that would be a killer feature for everybody else who ever used Facebook.

Facebook admits 'most' of its 2bn+ users may have had public profiles slurped by bots

Found on The Register on Thursday, 05 April 2018
Browse Internet

"It is clear now that we didn't do enough, we didn't focus enough on preventing abuse," Zuckerberg told reporters. "We didn't take a broad enough view of what our responsibility is, and that was a huge mistake."

Noting that the scraped profile information was limited to what was publically viewable, Zuckerberg told reporters "the vast majority of the data that Facebook knows is because you chose to share it."

The huge mistake was sharing data with a slurping company which happily sells its userdata to everybody.

Facebook says Cambridge Analytica fiasco worse than we thought

Found on CNet News on Wednesday, 04 April 2018
Browse Internet

Until now, it was reported that 50 million people's data had been co-opted from the social network. Facebook said today it's 87 million.

The news comes more than two weeks after Facebook first said it banned Cambridge Analytica for harvesting the data from a third part quiz app called "thisisyourdigitalife."

People will also no longer be able to search for Facebook profiles by typing phone numbers and email addresses into the social network's search box. That's because Facebook said it left people vulnerable to having their public profiles scraped by bad actors.

It took them this long to realize that such "features" get abused? That aside, if a "third part quiz app" gets you access to 87 million people, what range and data do the well-known apps have?

Instagram suddenly chokes off developers as Facebook chases privacy

Found on Techcrunch on Tuesday, 03 April 2018
Browse Internet

This weekend it surprised developers with a massive reduction in how much data they can pull from the Instagram API, shrinking the API limit from 5,000 to 200 calls per user per hour.

Causing this kind of platform whiplash could push developers away from the Instagram ecosystem, not that the company was too keen on some of these apps.

If Facebook and Instagram can’t even communicate changes to its policies with proper procedure and transparency, it’s hard to imagine it’s composed enough to firmly and fairly enforce them.

Hopefully it's he beginning of the downfall.

Grindr Is Letting Other Companies See User HIV Status And Location Data

Found on BuzzFeed on Monday, 02 April 2018
Browse Internet

The two companies — Apptimize and Localytics, which help optimize apps — receive some of the information that Grindr users choose to include in their profiles, including their HIV status and “last tested date.”

“The HIV status is linked to all the other information. That’s the main issue,” Pultier told BuzzFeed News. “I think this is the incompetence of some developers that just send everything, including HIV status.”

Hopefully more and more such cases will become public so people start to realize how bad the extensive data collection and mining is. The "I have nothing to hide" argument just shows how delusional some are.

This new privacy tool would speed up your internet, too

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 01 April 2018
Browse Internet

Announced Sunday, 1.1.1.1 aims to speed up your internet connection and make it impossible for your ISP to collect your browsing history. That's big news at a time when consumers are demanding more control of their data.

Cloudflare is working with third-party auditors at KPMG to examine their systems and guarantee they're not actually collecting your data.

It's promoting the implementation of a system called DNS over HTTPS, which encrypts that data about your web browsing as it flows online.

From reading just the headline you'd think that they would protect privacy by not resolving hostnames for tracker hosts, but it looks like they are just another DNS. Why they would want to use HTTPS (what will be very likely TCP based and thus much slower than UDP) instead of DTLS is another question.