Pirated copies of Orwell books pulled from Kindle

Found on PhysOrg on Friday, 17 July 2009
Browse Various

Users of Amazon.com's e-reader device were surprised and unsettled over the past day to receive notice that George Orwell works they had purchased, including "1984" and "Animal Farm," had been removed from their Kindle and their money refunded.

Herdener's explanation differed from what Kindle users were told by Amazon's customer service, which made no reference to piracy, but implied that the removal was the publisher's choice.

It's as if someone from your next door shop breaks into your house, takes whatever you bought the day before and leaves the money you paid. In the end, you don't have any financial loss, but the whole thing is pretty questionable. If I buy something, I want complete control over it; and that includes the decision to copy it, keep it or delete it when I want.

BlackBerry update bursting with spyware

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 14 July 2009
Browse Various

An update pushed out to BlackBerry users on the Etisalat network in the United Arab Emirates appears to contain remotely-triggered spyware that allows the interception of messages and emails, as well as crippling battery life.

Closer examination (as reported by itp.net) seems to indicate that all instances of the application were expected to register with a central server, which couldn't cope with the traffic - thus forcing all the instances to repeatedly attempt to connect while draining the battery.

Perhaps malware authors will shift to the mobile sector and leave the rest of the PC users alone. However, I admit that I do have doubts about that though.

Wikipedia Debates Rorschach Censorship

Found on Slashdot on Monday, 13 July 2009
Browse Various

The 10 inkblot images that form the classic Rorschach test have fallen into the public domain, and so including them on Wikipedia would seem to be a simple choice. However, some editors have cited the American Psychological Association's statement that exposure of the images to the public is an unethical act, since prior exposure to the images could render them ineffective as a psychological test.

Ethical reasons? That's something I haven't seen much lately in global politics. Anway, putting those blobs online isn't that much of a problem. After all, they only show fire and slaughtered people.

Government Spends $440 Million per Year on Wasteful Printing

Found on eWEEK on Saturday, 04 July 2009
Browse Various

A report from printer manufacturer Lexmark claims the federal government wastes $440 million dollars a year (almost $1 million per day) on unnecessary printing.

Overall, 69 percent of federal employees said they believe their agencies "rely strongly on paper trails."

Although 80 percent of respondents said they believe that they personally make conscious efforts to monitor their printing habits, 92 percent admitted they do not need all of the documents they print in a day.

Apart from the question why people print so much, the lack of proper mathematics literally stands out. I don't know on which planet the author lives where $440 million dollar a year are almost $1 million dollar per day.

Titsup airport express lane biz may pawn flyer data

Found on The Register on Friday, 26 June 2009
Browse Various

Defunct American airport security lane service Clear said on Friday it may sell its sensitive customer data to a similar provider if it's authorized to do so by the US government.

The company adds that its customers' personally identifiable information could still be used by a similar provider, presumably if Clear's assets are sold later on.

That's exactly the reason why I will not enter the US as long as you're forced to tell your whole life at the border and being treated like a terrorist in disguise. Not to mention that the data will be archived for who knows how long and is accessible by lots of people without any major security reasons, just for some screening.

Richard Marx (!) attacks RIAA after $1.92M Thomas verdict

Found on Ars Technica on Wednesday, 24 June 2009
Browse Various

Marx issued a strong statement against the "greedy actions of the major labels" after hearing about the $1.92 million Jammie Thomas-Rasset verdict.

In the wake of the RIAA win, the organization's legendarily poor public image somehow got even worse. Chicago Sun-Times music critic Jim DeRogatis called the Thomas-Rasset ruling "infamous as one of the most wrong-headed in the history of the American judicial system - not to mention that it will forever stand as the best evidence of the contempt of the old-school music industry toward the music lovers who once were its customers."

Industry, enjoy your legal victory.

Moby Says 'Disband The RIAA'

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 21 June 2009
Browse Various

As a whole bunch of you have sent in, the musician Moby has put up a blog post where he suggests the RIAA should be disbanded for its $1.92 million win over Jammie Thomas.

"maybe the record companies have adopted the 'it's better to be feared than respected' approach to dealing with music fans. i don't know, but 'it's better to be feared than respected' doesn't seem like such a sustainable business model when it comes to consumer choice."

More and more musicians realize that what the RIAA does is not for their benefit and only harms them. All these lawsuits never were meant to help musicians, but only for keeping the broken system behind the industry alive. Now that their "clients" start leaving, their points get weaker and weaker.

Media Analyst Calls Hulu 'Anti-American'

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 14 June 2009
Browse Various

Anti-America?!? How? Martin's claim is apparently "Media companies will lose a lot more revenue by giving shows away for free online than they will from pirates."

On top of that, Martin apparently hasn't looked at much of the actual research out there if she thinks that online shows are somehow cannibalizing TV revenue. In fact, most studies have found the opposite.

If you don't understand basic media economics, how can you be a media analyst?

I wonder why I still report stuff like that. Every week, there is another target for the "blame someone else" game of the entertainment industry. And it's getting so boring and ridiculous that it's pointless to even mention it.

German public broadcasters bullied over Web content

Found on Ars Technica on Thursday, 04 June 2009
Browse Various

If you like the Web content offered by German public broadcasters ZDF and ARD, you can thank the German newspaper industry for the upcoming reduction in offerings. Because of a loud outcry over unfair competition, public broadcasters have agreed to reduce the amount of stuff they put online, as well as the amount of time it stays online.

But, in the case of German newspapers, they would rather convince public broadcasters to take down their offerings than refit their business models to more effectively compete.

Well, what a nice bit of journalism Mrs Jacqui Cheng. Thoroughly investigated. Not. In fact, ARD and ZDF are public broadcasters who live from some sort of tax everybody owning TV, Radio or Internet access has to pay, no matter if that person accesses their content or not. After they started providing online content, they successfully lobbied for an extension of the tax to cover Internet access, although it would be so trivial to put a membership system in place (but hey, that generates less revenue). So, yes, it is unfair because they are funded by the government and don't have to care about how to make any money; they simply bill everybody.

Legalize it? Medical evidence on marijuana blows both ways

Found on PhysOrg on Sunday, 24 May 2009
Browse Various

Sparked anew by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's call for the state to study the legalization of marijuana, both sides in the smoldering pot debate point to research to bolster their positions.

Yet when the arguments for legalization of marijuana, both for medicinal and recreational use, are put forth, solid medical science often gets clouded in an ideological haze.

I don't see any problems at all. Cigarettes are legal and kill thousands of people every day. Same for alcohol. What more harm can marijuana add to this? A drug that is way less harmful that the legal ones.