PayPal Freezes the Assets of Wikileaks.org

Found on Slashdot on Saturday, 23 January 2010
Browse Various

"Paypal has as of 23rd of January 2010 frozen WikiLeaks assets. This is the second time that this happens. The last time we struggled for more than half a year to resolve this issue. By working with the respected and recognized German foundation Wau Holland Stiftung we tried to avoid this from happening again - apparently without avail."

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Wikileaks should have abandoned PayPal after the first account lock; or transferred all the money at least once a day out of the account to a real bank. PayPal is known for denying you access to your money without giving much of a reason. So: just don't use it.

Zuckerberg: I know that people don't want privacy

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 10 January 2010
Browse Various

Around the three-minute mark, he says: "People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people. That social norm is just something that has evolved over time."

Gosh, it's hard to keep up with these pesky social norms. They change so very, very quickly. Two years ago, Zuckerberg told ReadWriteWeb that privacy controls were "the vector around which Facebook operates."

Zuckerberg isn't in any position to speak for everybody. Personally, I want more privacy, simply because it has gotten much easier for others to gather the information you leave around and use it. Like for example information about your past, using that to reset e.g. your Yahoo password. You don't think that's possible? Well, ask Sarah Palin about popcorn.

El Reg sparks international incident with Olympics committee

Found on The Register on Thursday, 07 January 2010
Browse Various

You see, dear readers, the very official Olympic rules dictate that athletes are only allowed to have video cameras outside of specific areas. The USOC is apparently honestly concerned Cisco's statement gives the impression that Olympic athletes would actually be filming themselves in the midst of their own competition.

We're not updating that one, we just thought it was sort of funny because it showed how serious the business of Olympic-level sponsorship is.

It's pretty low when the greed for money gives the US Olympic Committee the bright idea to prohibit athletes to film themselves.

Trying to Add Portability to Movie Files

Found on New York Times on Monday, 04 January 2010
Browse Various

Hollywood and its high-tech partners are deeply concerned that their customers will rebel against some of the limitations taking shape as video moves away from physical discs.

Under the proposed system, proof of digital purchases would be stored online in a so-called rights locker, and consumers would be permitted to play the movies they bought or rented on any DECE-compatible device.

CSS on the next level. But we all know about DeCSS and all the other solutions for files crippled by DRM.

Bono: We Should Use China's Censorship As An Example

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 03 January 2010
Browse Various

Back in 2008, he did say that he mostly agreed with McGuinness that somehow ISPs were to blame for all of this. Then, in early 2009, there was an amusing interview where he basically said that piracy is bad, but he couldn't really speak out against it because he was too rich, and people would point that out.

In the past, the "young, fledgling songwriter" couldn't live off ticket or t-shirt sales either. He had to hope that he got the lucky golden ticket from a record label and that they didn't then crush his spirit and originality before discarding him as an unrecouped has-been.

Bono's article is laughable. He pretends to be Mr Save-the-world but contradicts himself so many times; because someone who cares about the world doesn't pay for an airplane ticket just to have his beloved hat flown ower. Stomping out piracy by turning the ISP into a chinese Big Brother who monitors every single step you do is his number two for the next decade. The most important thing is turning cars back into sex objects. Yes. That is the number one. It's not the carbondioxide deal, fighting cancer or freedom of the masses. This is also where Bono contradicts himself: he calls for a hard enforcing of the status quo in music, but at the same time goes on about how masses can change the world today and favors "Viva la (Nonviolent) Revolución". Seems like "la revolución" is only nice as long as it doesn't affect his dollars. Hopefully he will decide to sell his music only in China now; since their filtering is oh-so-great.

Tougher US air screening for 'terror-prone' countries

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 02 January 2010
Browse Various

Reports say people flying from Nigeria, Pakistan, Syria, Iran, Sudan, Yemen and Cuba will have pat-down body searches and have carry-on baggage searched.

The Transportation Security Administration said in a statement that the new rules apply to passengers flying from or through countries on the US State Department's "State Sponsors of Terrorism" list - Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria - and "other countries of interest".

As a terrorist leader, I now would call a sleeper from one of my cells inside the US and tell him to suicide bomb a central subway station during rush hour. Everybody is concentrating on airports and the news headlines would be something like "Officals were so not expecting this".

SoundExchange Claims To Open Up

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 28 December 2009
Browse Various

Why the government has granted exclusive rights to this industry group to collect and distribute money to musicians is troubling enough. But it's made worse by the fact that if SoundExchange "can't find" musicians to give the money to, it gets to keep the money.

As we've seen over and over again, many of these collections societies use sampling and counting methods that greatly overvalue big stars (who need the money less) at the expense of up-and-coming artists.

Of course it's not really interesting to search for someone to give money to if you're allowed to keep it as long as you can't find that person. Only a lobbied (bribed) politican can come up with support for such an idea.

New, terrifying, no-electronics U.S. flight security rules?

Found on CNet News on Saturday, 26 December 2009
Browse Various

Passengers are reporting that new restrictions are in place, and their severity varies flight to flight. Among the reports: No electronics allowed.

The New York Times is reporting that no one will be able to move from their seats during the last hour of flight. That means no bathroom breaks, no accessing carry-on luggage, nothing.

So you can't even play video games to distract yourself from how badly you have to pee.

I think the terrorists have scored. The current security precautions have been thwarted by a single person, leaving officials embarrassed and proving that there is no total security. Now happens what everybody was expecting: more restrictions. From what is known so far, this wouldn't have hindered Umar Farouk at all since he was in his seat and used a lighter. I'm awaiting the day when "flight-suits" are mandatory and need to be put on under official monitoring; your clothes will be locked up safely and returned to you once you've landed.

Big Bro 'sought amputee soldiers'

Found on Ananova on Thursday, 24 December 2009
Browse Various

It said army charities had been contacted by Endemol, the production company behind the Channel 4 show, asking for case studies of homeless or injured troops.

Annabelle Fuller, of the Army Benevolent Fund, told the newspaper: "We're a charity, not a selection box for bad TV programmes. The people we help are often vulnerable."

Commander John Muxworthy, of the UK National Defence Association, added: "How anyone could even attempt to try to take advantage of these people and their suffering is staggering."

It's even more surprising and shocking that people watch that show. Even after just one minute your brain starts to hurt really bad and you start to imagine all the things you want to do to the producers and whoever came up with the idea. Out of all the crap that's on TV, this show takes the crown for being the worst. By far.

Sony's Haber: You Can't Make Money Selling E-Books For $9.99

Found on paidContent on Wednesday, 16 December 2009
Browse Various

Haber decried the emphasis on the $9.99 price point for e-books. "The $9.99 price point is not a money-maker," he said. "Certain bestsellers are sold at that price for retail, competitive reasons. But you need to have a range. You could go from $10 to $20 even to $100 for an e-book."

Haber went on to defend the of DRM, which he doesn't see going away for awhile. "You need an orderly process to sell books and DRM makes that possible, mainly because it allows content creators and distributors to make money from that content."

See, and that's why I don't buy Sony products anymore. If I pay $100 for a book, I expect it to be either very rare, or of high quality. The content sure has its worth, but $100 for a single download? No thanks. If I'd be a writer, I would prefer that 100 people pay $1 each to read my book instead of a single fan who cashes out $100. In the end, I make the same but my audience is 100 times greater. And that DRM argument is so wrong it is ridiculous: DRM isn't needed to distribute and sell something, it only exists to limit what customers can do with the product they just paid for.