MPAA Releases Software For Parents

Found on Slashdot on Thursday, 27 January 2005
Browse Software

The MPAA have released their Parent File Scan tool, which 'helps consumers check whether their computers have peer-to-peer software and potentially infringing copies of motion pictures and other copyrighted material'. According to the MPAA, the software does not report any data back to the MPAA. However, users have noted that the software is not accurate; 'tagging' virtually every audio or video file it finds based on file extensions.

That's exactly the kind of software I would install and execute. No. I'm lying. Several others however gave it a try. It's not really the big stunt someone could expect. What they call a tool for finding pirated material simply lists all media files; pirated or not. It doesn't even bother to check anything, so if you have your latest homevideo on your PC, it will tell you that you have a pirated movie. It also lists mIRC as an evil P2P program... Splendid move, folks!

No Plans to Tweak DRM Download Mechanism

Found on eWEEK on Thursday, 13 January 2005
Browse Software

Microsoft Corp. says it has no plans to change the way its Windows Media Player handles the download of DRM licenses.

Amid reports that malicious hackers are using the anti-piracy mechanism to infect computers with spyware, adware, dialers and computer viruses, Microsoft officials stressed that the latest attack scenario does not exploit a vulnerability in the software.

Security experts warn that crackers are rigging .wmv files to use the DRM (digital rights management) features of Windows Media Player to browse sites infested with malware.

Coleman also recommended the use of Microsoft's new anti-spyware software, which is capable of detecting and deleting unwanted programs.

Now wait... MS gets notified of a serious problem with their software; but if something happens, it's the the fault of the user? What a wicked way of thinking. The constant rise of spam proves that users are unwilling to learn, so MS shouldn't assume that the DRM problem will be solved this way. Wait for the next URL spoof, and even those who pay attention can be tricked (we've already seen that XP with SP2 isn't that safe). And while we're talking about spyware: at least their spyware-scanner should support W98; many people are still using it.

The US Army is mad, and gunning for you

Found on The Inquirer on Tuesday, 11 January 2005
Browse Software

A filing on a forum from Phil DeLuca at America's Army game project indicates that the US Army is not at all happy at people s0dding about with its code.

DeLuca said that the US Army is very unhappy with hackers and others breaching its licence agreements, and it knows who these people are.

He said: "We know who you are, and can track down where you play from. We have incontrovertible proof you did something illegal. The Army is angry, and we're coming for you".

I had to laugh so hard when I read the post at the board. They really think the army has nothing better to do than go after some cheating kids. Especially since a bunch of those kids sit outside the US where they can do zero. The only thing that made me shake my head was the following part of the post: "In the early 1940's, Japan learned an important lesson – "let the sleeping giant lie." We may not react swiftly, but when we do it's with unstoppable force". Dude, nuking a country after it surrendered isn't something I'd be proud of (same goes for invading a country who never had WMDs). I guess the "sleeping giant" was lying there too (and I'm not talking about sleeping). I guess that's the typical brainwashed thinking the military likes.

MS AntiSpyware vs Ad-Aware vs. SpyBot

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 07 January 2005
Browse Software

Flexbeta.net compares Microsoft's new spyware fighting tool, Windows AntiSpyware, to Ad-Aware and SpyBot S&D; the two leading spyware tools on the market today. The review sets up an infected PC using VMWare Workstation and scans the machine using all three tools to see which tool detects the most spyware. Though still in beta, Microsoft AntiSpyware does an amazing job at detecting spyware by finding twice as many infected files as Ad-Aware and nearly three times as SpyBot.

When I read about the Beta release, I was wondering how good it would be. Unfortunately, I'm pretty lazy sometimes so I tried to test it on a virtual machine just a few minutes ago. Yes, tried only. After the installer told me that the software requires IE6, I upgraded the browser (at this point, the MS product was alread a no-no for me). After some reboots I once again tried to install it. This time I was told that it only works on XP, W2k or W2k3. Now the question is: why didn't it say so before I upgraded IE? It would have never worked on W98 anyway, but yet played dumb and asked for an IE update. Good thing I didn't try this on my main system. From the tests I've read, it's pretty good. But it's so dependant on IE6 that it looks like MS is trying to use it to get some users back to IE.

Microsoft Compares Windows And Linux

Found on Slashdot on Tuesday, 28 December 2004
Browse Software

Microsoft is hosting a discussion on Windows and Linux between its two top Linux consultants. Martin Taylor and Bill Hilf talk about the various OSS licenses, focus on the open source development model, competing implementations of administration tools, TCO, and risk assessment. Also available in offline formats, doc (which looks fine in OpenOffice.org) and wma as well.

Oh please... I'm so sick of those "comparisons". In the end, it's always how great and cheap MS is. I don't even bother to read that anymore; I could have better things to do, like waxing my private parts.

SCO targets UK companies

Found on Vnunet on Friday, 24 December 2004
Browse Software

The SCO Group has taken its controversial Linux licensing programme worldwide, and is warning of imminent legal action against UK companies.

SCO claims its intellectual property (IP) has been put into Linux without its consent, giving it the right to demand that Linux users buy a licence.

SCO senior vice president and general manager of SCOsource Chris Sontag said the firm expected to start legal action against Linux users in the next couple of weeks.

"There are large Linux users [in the UK] - with very large commercial usage of Linux for which our IP is being exploited - for whom we have a great deal of concern," he said.

I have no words for how ridiculous this is. SCO failed to prove anything, they are only playing the "more time" game to extort some money from people (what is not really working, if you take a look at their dramatic losses). A judge should make a "prove it or lose it" decision; either SCO shows its cards or it can forget the case. Honestly, why should anyone play that dumb if he does really own the IP rights?

Why OpenOffice.org? Open Document Formats

Found on Slashdot on Saturday, 11 December 2004
Browse Software

"In this current article about OpenOffice.org (also covered at Linux Today), I try to make a point about OpenOffice's commitment to open document formats and interchange as the strongest selling point - never mind cost. The OOo developers are putting a lot of effort into their XML format; will this pay off, and will users notice the significance of OpenDocument/OASIS document formats?" This can't be said enough: file formats are what determine whether and how easily data is portable, or whether the user is just stuck.

Open Office isn't bad at all. I recently needed to get some data from an old Excel file; even tho I have a complete MS Office here, I downloaded Open Office and used this one instead. Yes, it does have a few oddities, but in general, it works fine.

Failed XP Upgrade Downs 60,000 UK Gov't PCs

Found on eWEEK on Saturday, 27 November 2004
Browse Software

Most of the desktop computers in the UK's Department for Work and Pensions were paralyzed for four days on Monday, when a failed upgrade took them offline. The outage, covering 75 percent to 80 percent of the DWP's 80,000 PCs, is one of the largest in the UK government's not entirely impressive IT history.

According to one, a limited network upgrade from Windows 2000 to Windows XP was taking place, but instead of this taking place on only a small number of the target machines, all the clients connected to the network received a partial, but fatal, "upgrade."

Unfortunately the request was made to apply it live and it was rolled out across the estate, which hit around 80 percent of the Win2K desktops. This patch caused the desktops to BSOD and made recovery rather tricky as they couldn't boot to pick any further patches or recalls.

Lesson learned? I still wonder why anybody would like to upgrade (better downgrade) from W2k to XP. I've heard of more problems with XP. Plus, you receive a lot of new "features", such as product activation. For a gaming system, XP might be ok. But if you need a stable Windows, use W2k.

Valve shuts down 20,000 Half Life 2 accounts

Found on The Inquirer on Wednesday, 24 November 2004
Browse Software

Valve software has disabled the Steam accounts of 20,000 people it has said were attempting to use pirated copies of Half-Life 2.

In a statement released to Shacknews, Valve said that reasons for closing the accounts included credit card fraud, theft of other people's accounts and using cracked versions of Valve games.

It also denied reports that it had deliberately leaked out 'warez' copies of the game to entrap users.

Those who bought the game at retail are required to have the disc in the drive to play, a problem which doesn't plague Steam buyers. Attempts to circumnavigate this issue, however, will lead to account banning as a form of piracy, and has caused something of an outcry among hardcore gamers who are used to the 'buy it and crack it' mentality. They claim that legitimate users are being targetted as pirates without basis.

Of course it is their right to ban illegal accounts, but Valve should pay more attention. If a user actually bought the game, then why shouldn't he be allowed to crack it? Games run better from the harddrive than from a CD, so NoCD patches are easy to understand.

Microsoft doesn't own Excel, it appears

Found on The Inquirer on Monday, 22 November 2004
Browse Software

The Behemothic software company called Microsoft has lawyers who appear to have just made a huge cock-up when they came to sue a software outfit for using the word 'excel'.

It turns out that someone forgot to trademark the name and Microsoft didn't own it either. Apparently the legal eagles sent around a cease and desist letter to Savvysoft, which makes Excel portable to Linux under the name TurboExcel.

They also might not actually get the trademark as there is already an Excel Software which went into business just before the Vole's spreadsheet hit the shops.

Excel Software told NewsFactor hacks that it received a cease-and-desist letter about 15 years ago. But it replied by informing Microsoft it had the name first, and it has never heard from the lair of the Vole since.

Can we say "whoops"? It would be really amusing if Excel Software would receive the TM and sue MS.