Wii Update 4.2 Tries (and Fails) To Block Homebrew

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 30 September 2009
Browse Software

On September 28, Nintendo released a Wii update, titled 4.2. This update was targeted squarely at homebrew, performing sweeping changes throughout the system.

During BootMii's development, its authors noticed that Nintendo's code had critical bugs and could sometimes permanently brick a console by writing incorrect or unchecked data to flash memory, so they decided to write their own, much safer flashing code.

Another interesting tidbit is that Nintendo is not believed to have any method to repair this kind of brick at a factory, short of replacing the entire motherboard.

So, in an attempt to try and keep control over the Wii, Nintendo bricks systems thanks to buggy updates. Perhaps they shouldn't sell the box for a price lower than manufacturing costs, because (as always) those control efforts fail and result in nothing but angry users; and that's something a company doesn't want.

Old Operating Systems Don't Die

Found on Technologizer on Wednesday, 16 September 2009
Browse Software

After eight years of development, a new operating system called Haiku has been released in alpha form.

CP/M never really went away-it evolved into DOS PLUS, which then morphed into DR DOS, which one-time owner Caldera open-sourced as OpenDOS. Both DR DOS and OpenDOS are still with us.

Apple told it that having Commodore BASIC on the iPhone was too dangerous, which led Manomio to submit a version with BASIC disabled-except you could turn it on again if you knew how.

Wikipedia says that AmigaOS 4.1 was released last year, and that a "quick fix" (read: service pack) came out just last June. All I know for sure is that this version won't run on my Amiga 500-and that I'll shed a silent tear if AmigaOS ever ceases to exist.

Articles like this one make me want to boot up my old systems (C16/A500) and play around some. Even though it would be easier just to start an emulator.

Microsoft: Windows 7 upgrade can take nearly a day

Found on Ars Technica on Monday, 14 September 2009
Browse Software

A Microsoft Software Engineer has posted the results of tests the company performed to the upgrade time of Windows 7. Worst case scenario is that it will take a bit over 20 hours.

That's with 650GB of data, 40 applications, on mid-end hardware, and during a 32-bit upgrade. We don't even want to know how long it would take if Microsoft had bothered doing the same test with low-end hardware.

Considering that my system currently holds about 2TB of data and is not really mid-end hardware, an upgrade would take ages (not that I'd do that anyway). It would be way faster to just reinstall the OS and the applications; not to mention it's better for stability.

How much are you worth on the black market?

Found on IT World on Wednesday, 09 September 2009
Browse Software

The Norton Online Risk Calculator, unveiled within a microsite to coincide with the launch of Norton 2010, calculates your net worth on the black market by asking a few questions about your personal Internet use.

It takes a few minutes to answer the questions, after which you get three results: how much your online assets are worth, how much your online identity would sell for on the black market, and your risk of becoming a victim of identity theft.

That site didn't work in three different browsers on two different operating systems. Only after a total fresh install of the most current Firefox and the Flash 10 plugin, I was greeted by a slow loading page. After some waiting, the flash started working and CPU went up straight to 100% (which went down after switching to another tab and back up when returning). Mind you, there were no animations or whatsoever. Just a few options and buttons to click. Truly a Norton product; no doubt about it: create a little questionnaire that's impacting the system as much as possible. I guess managment ruled out a simple, plain and resource-friendly HTML-only solution. But in the end, the message came across: I won't buy anything from Norton ever. Much worse, I wouldn't even consider pirating their software. Yes, it's that bad.

Feds Want Apple and AT&T to Explain Google Voice Rejection

Found on Wired on Friday, 31 July 2009
Browse Software

According to the letters, the FCC wants to know the who, what, why and when of the rejection of the Google Voice app for the iPhone.

And here the FCC isn't limiting itself to questions about the Google Voice incident. The FCC also wants to know what other apps have been rejected, what the rules are and what role AT&T plays in such decisions.

For instance, AT&T said it expected Apple to reject a Skype application that would let users make internet phone calls using the phones' 3G data connection. Apple also forced Slingbox to cripple its video streaming application so that it would only work over WiFi, and not a mobile carrier's network.

Imagine where we would be today if the same stupidity was applied to computers: you just bought a HP/Lenovo/Dell system and are only allowed to install the software they think is good for you. Want to install that neat freeware that helps you save hours of work? Well too bad if it's not in their store. All that only hurts the consumer. Just let users install everything they want, and if they brick it, they will learn from that and have to reinstall. But then I guess that's not an option since the iPhone is so unbelievable buggy that a hacker can use it to bring down the entire network if it's not controlled by Big Apple.

Microsoft: GPL violation didn't drive Linux donation

Found on The Register on Thursday, 23 July 2009
Browse Software

Microsoft is standing by its decision to release thousands of lines of code to the GPL, saying the decision wasn't based on a violation of the popular license.

It was the only reference to any violation of the GPL, meaning Microsoft has not tackled the original question of how it was in violation, why it happened, and what steps it has taken to prevent such an occurrence from happening in the future.

Still I wonder if this would have happened if the GPL violation wasn't involved.

Mission possible: researchers make online text self-destruct

Found on Ars Technica on Tuesday, 21 July 2009
Browse Software

Their scheme, called Vanish, encrypts the message, and then essentially throws away the key. The trick is that the key will take a set amount of time before disappearing from view; during that time, it's still possible to access the data.

Because the online storage system purges data after set periods of time, once that time is up, the key is permanently lost. In essence, the message has self-destructed.

This message will self-destruct in three, two, one. Gone. Now that super-secret text is gone for good. I'm so glad I made a screenshot of it (or just copied and pasted it). The idea isn't bad, but I bet some users might think that it will take care of the security they should apply. Vanish is a tool, not a solution to non-existent security precautions.

Most expensive javascript ever?

Found on Opera on Monday, 20 July 2009
Browse Software

Management put a hefty check on the table - I'm sure our beloved sysadmins felt like kids before Christmas - and salivating sales people from major hardware vendors grabbed our requirements spec, dived into their CRMs and crunched their spreadsheets.

However, one of the world's biggest hardware vendors - whose name every single reader will be familiar with, and whose hardware a good share of you will be using right now - apparently didn't do their homework. When Opera's sysadmin booted up the server to test its web-based administration interface, they came across a single JavaScript statement that managed to piss off everyone up to and including the CTO.

My guess is Dell. That's the only hardware vendor I'd pick. Sure, they might be huge and lots of people use their desktops (some even use their servers), but I sure won't. Dell is out of question when it comes to hardware. Their systems may work, but their service is just awful. They sent Mr Bicycle Repair Man from India (no kidding) to the datacenter who decided to switch a production server offline for hours just for some random testing, when the cause for the error was already known. After lots of nerve-wrecking phone calls and visits to the DC, they replaced the whole system; although just a memory module was faulty.

Norton Internet Security 2010 beta in pictures

Found on Cnet News on Thursday, 16 July 2009
Browse Software

Norton Internet Security 2010 won't be available for a few more months, but the beta version is available now.

Built upon the dramatic performance improvements are deeper integration with other security tools like OnlineFamily.

What? The worst resource hog ever is still alive?

Decoding the HTML 5 video codec debate

Found on Ars Technica on Monday, 06 July 2009
Browse Software

Although HTML 5 is still in the draft stage, several of its features have already been widely adopted by browsers like Safari, Chrome, and Firefox. Among the most compelling is the "video" element, which has the potential to free Web video from its plugin prison and make video content a native first-class citizen on the Web-if codec disagreements don't stand in the way.

The HTML 5 working group is split between supporters of Ogg Theora and H.264.

Apple and Google favor H.264 while Mozilla and Opera favor Ogg Theora.

What's with that pointless codec discussion anyway? HTML5 will arrive in years, if not a decade. Deciding on a codec is the worst thing one can do, because it assumes that codecs will not get better over the years. There has been no forced format for the img tag in the beginning, otherwise we'd be limited with gif instead of switching to the advanced png. All that aside, the video and audio tags sound like prime candidates for being blocked because I don't want to websites to bomb me with random noise and video; something advertisers will probably try a lot.