Man gets life imprisonment for p0rn

Found on The Inquirer on Sunday, 05 September 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

The chinese government is bringing in even tougher penalties against internet porn peddlers.

Those caught for 'serious offenses' could now face life imprisonment while less serious cases could result in compulsory surveillance, detainment, taking into custody by the police.

Just in case you were wondering what the Chinese would consider a 'serious' case. Xinhua kindly points out that any pornographic Web site that had been clicked on more than 250,000 times would be considered a "very severe" case that could warrant a life sentence for its owners.

I guess it would be easier for China to launch its own internet and cut off all outgoing connections to this dangerous Internet. Something like Chinanet.

US raids Net song swappers

Found on Reuters on Monday, 30 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

U.S. agents have raided the homes of five people who allegedly traded hundreds of thousands of songs, movies and other copyrighted material over the Internet, Attorney General John Ashcroft says.

Until now, the Justice Department has only pursued elite groups of hackers who steal and distribute movies, music and software before their official release dates.

Targeted in the raids were people operating "hubs" in a file-sharing network based on Direct Connect software.

In order to join the network, members had to promise to provide between one and 100 gigabytes of material to trade, or up to 250,000 songs, Ashcroft said.

Each of the five hubs contained 40 petabytes of data, the equivalent of 60,000 movies or 10.5 million songs, Ashcroft said.

First of all, you don't "promise" to share a certain amount. Either you do, or the hub will kick you. Next, a minimum amount of data does not neccessarily mean illegal data. Last but not least: 40PB? On every hub? That makes 200PB on just those five. It's pretty obvious that Ashcroft has no idea what he is saying. Let's do a little calculation: 40PB = 40960TB = 41943040GB = 42949672960MB. If you assume 700MB per movie, this results in 61356675 movies. Of course, on every hub...

CD Buyers In France Sue Over Copy Protection

Found on Techdirt on Thursday, 26 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

A group of individual CD buyers in France, combined with a French consumer association, have filed a lawsuit against EMI and a record store for selling copy protected CDs, suggesting there has been "deception over the material qualities of a product," since many copy protected CDs don't work well in car stereos or on computers. The record store in question claims they clearly warn consumers of the possibility and offer to refund money if the CDs don't work. As backwards as the policy of copy protection on CDs is (punishing your legitimate buyers, while doing little to stop actual copying) this case seems fairly weak. While the recording industry is obviously a huge fan of lawsuits, suing them back isn't the answer. Making them realize that copy protection is bad for their business is the only way the industry is going to change.

While suing them might have little success, it at least gets their attention. Plus, those things they sell are not CDs, since they violate the standard and therefore are not allowed to have the CD logo on them.

JibJab Wins - 'This Land' is Public Domain

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 25 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

JibJab, creators of the hilarious parody of Woody Guthrie's 'This Land is Your Land' featuring Pres. Bush and Sen. Kerry, were first threatened with a lawsuit and then, with the help of EFF, went to court first in a pre-emptive strike. Well, EFF discovered that the song has actually been in the public domain since 1973 because it was first published in a songbook [PDF] in 1945 and the copyright was never renewed. The case has now been settled. Here are some addtional links.

What proves once again that it might be a wise idea to question suspicious claims.

Movie Industry Sues More DVD Chip Makers

Found on Reuters on Tuesday, 24 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

The representative for Hollywood's major movie studios on Monday said its members have sued two microchip makers, alleging they sold their products to makers of equipment that can be used to illegally copy DVDs.

The MPAA said the suits against Sigma Designs Inc. (SIGM.O: Quote, Profile, Research) and MediaTek Inc. (2454.TW: Quote, Profile, Research) followed testing that it said proved the two were selling microchips to companies, whose DVD players lack what the MPAA called "appropriate security features."

The CSS license pact has aided the success of DVDs because it has provided protection against illegal copying to copyright owners of movies, television shows and other content sold on DVD.

It's getting ridiculous. At first they tried to sue users and failed; then they tried to sue P2P companies and failed. Now they sue hardware manufactures and ... Besides, there's no movie which is available on DVD only. So much for "appropriate security features".

Ferreting out copyright scofflaws

Found on CNet News on Wednesday, 11 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

Just when you thought software licensing enforcement couldn't get any more fun, the copyright cops at the Business Software Alliance have enlivened the process with a spunky cartoon ferret.

The comic will feature the droopy-drawers ferret, who for now is referred to as the "Copyright Crusader." Kids are urged to help select his final name by submitting votes next month through the BSA's Web site.

The ferret, by the way, does seem to be an odd mascot choice for an organization devoted to strict legal adherence, given that the weasel-like mammals are outlawed in California and several other states.

Brainwashing children, eh? Well, I don't know for sure, but looks like someone doesn't know the Internet. The website for their project, www.playitcybersafe.com, is named in a really wrong way. "Play it, cyber safe"? Uhmm....

CAN-SPAM Is A Bust

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 06 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

The Congressional chatter about 'canning spam', in the CAN-SPAM law since January, has turned out to really mean 'they can still spam'. TechWeb News reports that 'In July, compliance fell for the first time under one percent to a measly 0.54 percent', from its 3% max. The researchers claim the ball has been dropped by 'law enforcement'. Those police are probably too busy deleting the 80% spam from their email, like everyone else.

While we all know that this law was doomed since it was first mentioned (ok, except for some politicians who have no understanding of the Internet), it is still kind of amazing to see how doomed it is. Only 0.54%. I think even the mathematical probability for an accidental compliance should be higher than that.

FCC Rules VoIP Must Be Tappable

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 04 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

"The FCC has unanimously approved the U.S. Justice Department's bid to expand CALEA to broadband and VoIP networks, according to reports from SecurityFocus and News.com. This means, following a mandatory public comment period, service providers will have to wire their networks for easy law enforcement surveillance, the way phone companies do now. The feds have wanted this for a long time." Ebon Praetor adds a link to Reuters' version, writing "In addition, the FCC has decided that the push-to-talk, or walkie-talkie, functions available on phones from Nextel should also be subject to the same tapping regulations that regular phones are."

This makes me wonder why they put so much effort into pushing new wiretapping laws through. All it takes is a PGP encrypted email and the Feds stay out. Or perhaps they already have a backdoor to that...

Viagra maker cracks down on counterfeit sales

Found on CNet News on Tuesday, 03 August 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

Pfizer, the maker of Viagra, has launched a legal battle against dozens of online pharmacies that sell counterfeit or illegal generic versions of its drug.

The company on Tuesday also announced an advertising campaign to educate consumers on how to avoid deceptive Web sites, safely purchase Viagra online, and minimize Viagra-related spam.

The drug giant is suing five companies and individuals--Oriontech, You Save RX, CNR International, Charles William Naron and Doug Hollenbeck--alleging violation of state and federal trademark rules and unfair competition laws.

The company is working with the Department of Justice, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the FBI and the Food and Drug Administration to prosecute counterfeiters. Pfizer said that while some Web sites sell generic Viagra, the FDA has not approved a generic version of the drug.

Well that sure is a honourable step, but considering that the Internet is a worldwide net, I doubt it will be as effective as planned. It just takes a handful of spammers and dealers in foreign countries and everything is back to normal (except that we might receive spam with more errors. But honestly: who cares about correct grammar in spam?).

Big Time Spammer Shut Down By CAN-SPAM

Found on Internet Week on Friday, 30 July 2004
Browse Legal-Issues

A federal court this week shut down a big-time Florida spammer and froze his assets, using the CAN-SPAM Act to put a stop to his mass mailings. Creaghan A. Harry is "responsible for what likely amounts to millions of illegal spam messages," said the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in a statement.

The FTC filed a complaint in a Chicago federal court July 21, alleging that Harry used a slew of tactics that violate the CAN-SPAM Act, including spoofing forging return addresses and sending messages through hijacked computers, dubbed "open proxies."

On Tuesday, a U.S. District Court Judge issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Harry from further spamming and blocked his assets, which had been transferred to a bank account in Latvia. If Harry is convicted, those monies would be used to refund consumers who bought the phony products.

Wow, this is like, the first real use for this law. Being dubbed the solution for spam, they now managed to stop one big spammer. Ok, perhaps now everybody will get 1 spam less per day. This needs a technical solution; laws won't fix it.