UK hacker's case before Law Lords

Found on BBC on Sunday, 15 June 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

A Briton is taking his fight against US extradition for allegedly carrying out the "biggest military computer hack of all time" to the House of Lords.

If extradited, they said, he would face an unknown length of time in pre-trial detention, with no likelihood of bail.

Mr McKinnon has always maintained he was motivated by curiosity and only managed to get into the networks because of lax security.

He probably would end up labeled as a terrorist in Guantanamo.

Customers cry fraud over Comcast P2P meddling in new lawsuit

Found on Ars Technica on Saturday, 07 June 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

Three class-action lawsuits were filed against Comcast this week in California, Illinois, and New Jersey, alleging that the company deceived and misled consumers by advertising that it offered "unfettered access to all the content, services, and applications that the Internet has to offer."

In November, the Electronic Frontier Foundation released a report detailing its own investigation, confirming that BitTorrent performance was being selectively degraded by unexpected TCP reset packets.

Comcast did not tell customers that it would engage in this type of traffic shaping when the company promised "unfettered access," and was not authorized to do so by its customers.

The city of Los Angeles has also announced that it is suing Time Warner Cable for deceptive business practices and false advertising.

Why is it so hard to be honest? If Comcast doesn't want unlimited usage, it should just say so. It could let people know that they have eg 10GB/month included, or just sell slower lines so you can't download as much. Then the customer can easily decide wheter or not he wants to sign up with Comcast, or go to another, better ISP. Oh wait, that's exactly the reason why they are lying. In these days Comcast can't really advertise with limits and caps, even though they want them so badly that they will do it by illegal means.

Radiohead to Prince: Hey, that's OUR song

Found on CNN on Friday, 30 May 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

After word spread that Prince covered Radiohead's "Creep" at Coachella, the tens of thousands who couldn't be there ran to YouTube for a peek. Everyone was quickly denied -- even Radiohead.

Yorke laughed when his bandmate, guitarist Ed O'Brien, said the blocking had prevented him from seeing Prince's version of their song.

When Prince performed at the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival in Indio, California, on April 26, he prohibited the standard arrangement of allowing photographers to shoot near the stage during the first three songs of his set.

Sometimes, DMCA (abuse) can be good. After all, who wants to watch and, more mind-numbing, listen to a cover version Prince did? Or any of his music for that matter.

Watchdog exposes Google antics

Found on The Inquirer on Thursday, 29 May 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

An anonymous tipster who alerted the Australian competition watchdog about Ebay's proposal to force its users onto the Paypal payments system was none other than Google.

The watchdog had received a 38-page anonymous report from a whistleblower in which the move was dubbed 'anti-competitive'.

When Bromage started to tell world + dog about Google's involvement, the document was pulled and has since been replaced by one less revealing.

I wouldn't call it anti-competitive. If Ebay forces me to use Paypal only, then I simply quit using Ebay; not that I use it more than once per year anyway. Having heard eyebrow-raising stories about Paypal, I don't trust them at all. Usually, the rules are simple: limit your customers, lose your customers.

Don't Blame The Taser, Doctor Bro... Or Else We Sue

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 04 May 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

There have been a number of reported deaths of people soon after those individuals were subdued by law enforcement using a Taser stun gun.

It appears that the company has taken the exceptionally aggressive step of suing some of the doctors who list a Taser shock as one of the causes of death. It then uses research and "experts" paid for by Taser to make the claim that a Taser cannot lead to death -- preferring the basically made up diagnosis of "excited delirium."

The reasoning should be pretty simple: alive guy plus Taser equals dead guy. Without the use of a Taser, some people might still be alive, so I'd say it is rather clear that those weapons are deadly.

Universities Baffled By Massive Surge In RIAA Copyright Notices

Found on Wired on Friday, 02 May 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

In the last 10 days, universities around the country have seen more than a 20-fold increase in the number of filesharing takedown notices from the recording industry.

Indiana University says that starting on April 21, the Recording Industry Association of America began sending 80 legal notices a day to the university, under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

But many of the recent notices don't correspond to entries in traffic logs, which also don't show any overall increase in file sharing, Bruhn said.

"They in fact can't know if the files being offered are actually the protected works of their clients -- how would they know if they didn't download and open them?" Bruhn said.

University of California at Berkeley's chief information officer Shel Waggener confirmed he'd heard of the spikes and suggested there was a political purpose driving them.

For more than two years, the industry claimed that more than 40 percent of illegal movie downloads came from college students -- costing the industry billions of dollars. Then in January of this year, the estimate was reduced to 15% for college-aged students, and only 3% occurring on campus networks.

It seems like they are increasing their threat letters in order to whine in a few months about how much piracy has increased; something which could lead to overblown legislations. A cunning plan indeed. However, in the end, they just cry wolf. I don't trust any of their "official" reports; not even remotely. For me, the industry has turned into nothing but a conglomerate of shady liars.

Senator: Let's monitor P2P for illegal files

Found on CNet News on Thursday, 17 April 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

Senate Democrat on Wednesday said federal and local police should use custom software to monitor peer-to-peer networks for illegal activity, and he wants to spend $1 billion in tax dollars to help make that happen.

Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) said he was under the impression it's "pretty easy to pick out the person engaged in either transmitting or downloading violent scenes of rape, molestation" simply by looking at file names.

But in about half its cases, for purposes of longer-term tracking, the software captures "unique serial numbers" from the person's computer and keeps a tally of how many allegedly illicit files that particular user is trading.

If they want to wiretap the traffic, their ingenious plan can be foiled by ticking that encryption checkbox of your P2P application. If they want to search for certain file names, quite a few people will start sharing legal movies which got renamed to "super underage orgy.mpg". if they actually do find an illegal video and manage to get the owner's address via a subpoena, then this person still can just be running e.g. a TOR exit node which isn't illegal. And what are "unique serial numbers"? I hope he doesn't mean MAC addresses or P2P userids, which can be changed in less than a minute.

Mediasentry Violates Cease & Desist Order

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 09 April 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

On January 2, 2008, the Massachusetts State Police ordered MediaSentry, the RIAA's investigator, to cease and desist from conducting investigations in Massachusetts without a license. Based on what appears to be irrefutable proof that MediaSentry has been violating that order, the Boston University students who tentatively won, in London-Sire v. Doe 1, an order tentatively quashing the subpoena for their identities, have brought a new motion to vacate the RIAA's court papers altogether, on the ground that the RIAA's 'evidence' was procured by criminal behavior.

Funny how they think they can violate the law to push through their idea of what law should be like.

DVD piracy too rife among police to prosecute

Found on The Australian on Monday, 07 April 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

Hundreds of police officers across South Australia caught using their work computers to illegally copy movie DVDs will escape prosecution.

The activity - strictly banned under federal copyright laws - was detected during an audit conducted by the information technology branch of SA Police.

Police sources have told The Advertiser an official investigation, which could lead to criminal charges, will not be conducted because of the large number of police officers involved in copying DVDs.

Being a police officer isn't that bad after all it seems. You get away with piracy just because all of your colleagues are doing it too. And this might just be the first step: if you can rally up enough of your pals, you can start a career in drug and human trafficking too. Oh, and terrorism of course, because we all know piracy supports terrorism. Well, dog don't eat dog.

Lawyer Who Threatened File-Sharers is Banned For 6 months

Found on Zorrentfreak on Saturday, 05 April 2008
Browse Legal-Issues

For anti-piracy company, Logistep, life is becoming more and more difficult by the day. They have been deemed to be operating illegally in Italy and have been slammed over privacy issues in the home country, Switzerland.

Lawyer Elizabeth Martin had been demanding 400 Euros from hundreds of thousands of file-sharers who Logistep say had been infringing the rights of software company Techland, on their game 'Call of Juarez'.

Unfortunately for Elizabeth Martin, it's not just the general public who are disgusted by her actions. She has been the subject of a Conseil de l'Ordre du Barreau de Paris disciplinary investigation - and subsequent condemnation - by none other than her own peers.

Elizabeth Martin was ordered by the disciplinary board to suspend her activities as a lawyer for 6 months. Furthermore, she was banned from belonging to the National Council of the Bars (CNB) and other such professional associations for a period of 10 years.

Ahh, Logistep again. Every time you read about them, they're up to the ears in something illegal, or at least something very shady. Anyway, hundreds of thousands of filesharers for a single game? Must be the new Tetris or Pong. And lawyers really wonder why everybody hates them...