RIAA: "we have no choice" but to file more named lawsuits

Found on Ars Technica on Tuesday, 05 May 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

The RIAA said it would file no more "new" lawsuits against individual file-swappers, but it filed more such lawsuits in April.

Beckerman noted that the music labels had filed new cases in April, despite their claim to Congress (and Ars) that they had stopped "initiating new lawsuits" in August 2008.

But as the Time Warner Cable data caps issue showed, nothing makes the grassroots angrier than a massive corporation interfering with their Internet. And nothing gives a Congressman or Senator more incentive to stand up to corporations than an angry mob of voters.

Lying to Congress too now. I guess they have lied to everybody by now at least once. I can't wait for them to disappear from this world and get buried in the hole they dug all by themselves.

RIAA settles for $7,000 after 4 years pursuing NY mum

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 28 April 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

The recording industry has accepted a paltry $7,000 to settle a long-running federal music piracy lawsuit it brought against a family in New York four years ago.

"We are pleased to have reached an agreement with the Santangelos," Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the RIAA, told AP. She declined to comment on how much the organisation had spent to secure the $7,000 settlement.

"We don't break out costs per case, and it's not a question of it being 'worth it' or a 'victory'," she said.

So they paid. A lot. Otherwise the RIAA would have sent tons of press releases out hailing their victory. But everybody knows that running a lawsuit for four years costs way more than $7,000, so they prefer not to talk about this too much. However, this lawsuit will play another role: the expenses will be added to the "losses due to piracy" tab and act as an argument for a more insane legislation.

Pirate Bay Judge Exposed as Member of Pro-Copyright Groups

Found on Wired on Wednesday, 22 April 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

One of the four men convicted in The Pirate Bay trial is seeking to have his guilty verdict thrown out after learning that the judge in the trial is a member of two pro-copyright groups, including one whose membership includes entertainment industry representatives who argued in the case.

"It wasn't appropriate for him to take on this case," says Eric Bylander, senior lecturer in procedure law at Gothenburg University.

Knowing this, the outcome of the lawsuit suddenly isn't that surprising at all anymore.

Pirate Bay founders sent to jail

Found on BBC News on Thursday, 16 April 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

Frederik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, Carl Lundstrom and Peter Sunde were found guilty of breaking copyright law and were sentenced to a year in jail.

Speaking to the BBC, the chairman of industry body the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) John Kennedy said the verdict sent out a clear message.

"There has been a perception that piracy is OK and that the music industry should just have to accept it. This verdict will change that," he said.

"There is a lot of anger in Sweden right now. File-sharing is an institution here and while I can't encourage people to break copyright law, I'm not following it and I don't agree with it."

In other news: nothing will change. Kennedy can't really believe this will stop filesharing; their business models are outdated and they refuse to deal with that. The clear message is that they are butt-hurt. Slavery was legal once too and farmers said they cannot exist without slaves. Guess what? They could change. Many artists have discovered that filesharing actually helps them a lot. Next targets on the to-sue list are Google for being a search engine providing links to torrent files and blogs for bad reviews and spoilers.

Wolverine leak claims first victim?

Found on The Register on Sunday, 05 April 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

A FoxNews.com journalist got himself into serious hot water over the weekend after he published a review of an illegally downloaded copy of X-Men Origins: Wolverine ahead of its 1 May release.

Reports over the weekend claim that News Corp, which owns Fox News and 20th Century Fox, had fired Friedman following his decision to illegally download Wolverine.

Wolverine made its unauthorised debut last Tuesday. Its distributor, 20th Century Fox, coughed to the embarrassing leak the following day, when the studio said it would easily be able to track down the culprit.

Go cry Fox. I don't care about the movies you make and wouldn't even download Wolverine if you make it available for free. Not that I think X-Men is that bad, but all your actions make me refuse your products.

Another ISP Ad Snooper Hit With Lawsuit

Found on Wired on Monday, 02 March 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

In early June of 2007, Susan Simon noticed odd things happening to her internet connection and traced the troubles to an outfit called Adzilla that turned out to be spying on everything she did online.

The purported class-action lawsuit seeks to put another spike in the heart of online marketers' dreams of total information awareness.

It just sounds too nice: collect some data, inject ads and increase your revenue. However, as long as the users did not opt-in, it's just illegal wiretapping.

Prosecution Baffled by Pirate Bay's Anarchic Structure

Found on Wired on Friday, 20 February 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

Neij explained that an extended group of people have privileges on the server, and contribute haphazardly as they see fit. The prosecutor seemed not to grasp the concept.

"But someone must ultimately decide whether to put up a certain text or graphic," he protested.

"No," Neij answered. "Why? If someone believes a new text is needed, he just inputs it. Or if a graphic is ugly, someone makes a better one. The one who wants to do something just does it."

Someone should show that prosecutor Wikipedia; or better, explain how it works.

ISPs worry that Net safety bills would outlaw e-mail

Found on CNet News on Thursday, 19 February 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

Two new federal proposals that Republican supporters claim will protect children have alarmed Internet companies, who say the measures could make it a crime to provide e-mail.

The mere provision of e-mail, electronic storage, cloud-computing services, and social-networking sites could be viewed as an act that "facilitates access to" illegal content, especially if the provider knows that some users in the past have been less than law-abiding.

Somebody at least thought of the children. No, really, how can politicians come up with crap like this? They don't understand anything about the Internet, so they should just shut up. Everything can facilitate access to illegal content (and the politicans' beloved child pornography). The telephone company, the maker of your VCR or CD/DVD drive (or of the computer for that), paper mills (you can print out illegal things, you know?) and whatever comes to your mind. Children sometimes even get shot, but nobody plans to outlaw guns. Oh wait, the Internet has no big lobby group like weapon manufacturers.

RIAA lies exposed

Found on The Inquirer on Thursday, 05 February 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

The RIAA has been outed as a lying toad as it claimed in a letter sent out on December 23rd last year that it was discontinuing lawsuits when in fact, this was simply not the case.

Mitch Bainwol's letter to the Congressional Committees claimed that the Recording Industry Association of America "discontinued initiating new lawsuits in August."

Of course this information was taken as red, yet after a bit of digging around, this was found to be utter tosh.

Everybody go and share as much as possible. I don't care if the whole entertainment industry goes down the drain; in fact, I hope it will. Yes, people will loose jobs; but so do people every day. Don't even start with the "where will you get good movies and music from" line. Those who learn how to work with the Internet will deliver. The big industry produces nothing worth paying for and can only moan and cry.

German Court Allows Frank Zappa Festival To Continue

Found on Techdirt on Tuesday, 27 January 2009
Browse Legal-Issues

Frank Zappa's widow, Gail Zappa, has been rather aggressive over the years in "protecting" the intellectual property associated with Frank Zappa and his music. Most recently, she tried to stop the very popular Zappanale festival, held each year in Bad Doberan, Germany.

Gail Zappa apparently was quite upset by this, and sued the organizers for trademark infringement, demanding hundreds of thousands of dollars for daring to celebrate her husband's music without a license.

Sounds like a certain someone is trying to squeeze every possible cent out of her husband's name. Perhaps getting a job would distract her from the harsh reality in which she won't get a free life just because Frank made music.