Chinese telecom manufacturer says Motorola sold trade secrets

Found on Ars Technica on Sunday, 23 January 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

Chinese telecom manufacturer Huawei Technologies has filed a lawsuit against Motorola, accusing the technology giant of trying to transfer Huawei's intellectual property to Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) without permission.

"Motorola... has not responded with assurances that it will prevent disclosure of that information to NSN," Huawei said in a statement. "If Huawei's proprietary commercial property and information is transferred to a third party, Huawei will suffer irreparable commercial damage."

I find it somewhat amusing that a chinese company rages about illegal transfers of trade secrets and industrial espionage.

RIAA threatens ICANN over new TLDs

Found on Domain Incite on Tuesday, 18 January 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

The RIAA, no stranger to playing the bogeyman when it comes to technological change, is concerned that .music, for example, could be used to encourage copyright infringement.

"We strongly urge you to take these concerns seriously... we prefer a practical solution to these issues, and hope to avoid the need to escalate the issue further."

Regardless, the RIAA's argument that .music equals piracy is pretty poor, possibly disingenuous, and unlikely to influence the Guidebook.

How can you not hate that industry? Constant legal threats are all they hand out. A .music TLD will boost piracy just like .iq boosts intelligence and .xxx boosts rape.

Wikileaks' Assange charged in US with 'treason'

Found on Thinkq on Wednesday, 12 January 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

David Pitchford, a Florida trailer park resident, names Assange and WikiLeaks as defendants in a personal injury suit filed with the Florida Southern District Court in Miami.

In the complaint filed on 6th January, Pitchford alleges that Assange's negligence has caused "hypertension", "depression" and "living in fear of being stricken by another heart attack and/or stroke" as a result of living "in fear of being on the brink of another nucliar [sic] WAR".

The court filing stipulates Pitchford's demand for $1.5 million in damages.

That would let him buy a really big trailer.

US wants Twitter details of Wikileaks activists

Found on BBC News on Friday, 07 January 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

The US government has subpoenaed the social networking site Twitter for personal details of people connected to Wikileaks, court documents show.

The San Francisco-based website was given three days to respond was also told not to disclose that it had been served the subpoena, or the existence of the investigation.

However, the same court removed those restrictions on Wednesday and authorised Twitter to disclose the order to its customers.

Back in 2005 and 2006, the chinese government demanded personal details for email accounts of a political dissident and a reporter who leaked classified information (Li Zhi and Shi Tao). The backlash was gigantic and a disaster for Yahoo: "While technologically and financially you are giants, morally you are pygmies. (...) These were demands by a police state to make an American company a co-conspirator in having a freedom-loving Chinese journalist put in prison" (Tom Lantos), "It is repugnant. It would be funny if it weren't so sickening." (Dana Rohrabacher). Now, the American government demands personal details for twitter accounts of friends of a reporter who leaked classified information.

Microsoft wants to patent 'fans'

Found on TechFlash on Thursday, 06 January 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

In a filing made public today, Microsoft is seeking a patent for something it calls "One-Way Public Relationships" in social networks and other online properties.

Unless there's some innovative nuance hidden in the text of the application, it seems like Microsoft could face an uphill climb in its quest for a patent on this one.

Hello? What about prior art? This is another perfect example why all software patents should be nullified.

UN to investigate treatment of jailed leaks suspect Manning

Found on The Guardian on Wednesday, 22 December 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

Manning's supporters say that he is in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day; this could be construed as a form of torture. This month visitors reported that his mental and physical health was deteriorating.

He was charged in July with leaking classified material including video posted by WikiLeaks of a 2007 US attack in Baghdad by a Apache helicopter that killed a Reuters news photographer and his driver.

I wouldn't be surprised if, by accident of course, there would always be a bucket full of water and a towel around whenever agents have a "meeting" with him.

Judge kills massive P2P porn lawsuit, kneecaps copyright troll

Found on Ars Technica on Thursday, 16 December 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

Ken Ford, the lawyer behind the Adult Copyright Company, has just had his business model chopped off at the knees; not only did Judge John Preston Bailey dismiss every defendant but one in Ford's mass lawsuits, he also demanded that each case be filed separately and that Ford only submit IP addresses likely to map to West Virginia Internet users.

In a series of orders today that cover all seven of Ford's initial September cases, the judge "severed" every defendant but one. If Ford wants to proceed against all these people, he can do so individually and pay the $350 per case filing fee. (For the cases severed yesterday, this would amount to $1.8 million in filing fees alone.)

That should stop quite a few trolls who planned to try the same; it also sends a nice signal to the industry.

Wiseguy scalpers bought tickets with CAPTCHA-busting botnet

Found on Network World on Friday, 19 November 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

Three California men have pleaded guilty charges they built a network of CAPTCHA-solving computers that flooded online ticket vendors and snatched up the very best seats for Bruce Springsteen concerts, Broadway productions and even TV tapings of Dancing with the Stars.

They had to create shell corporations, register hundreds of fake Internet domains (one was stupidcellphone.com) and sign up for thousands of bogus e-mail addresses to make the scam work.

I wouldn't call this that much of a crime. They solved the captchas and paid for the tickets. Lots of things online are automated and nobody seems to mind. For example, a whole industry is based on snipers which make a bid in the last seconds on eBay. You might as well sue them too.

Kiss Collared In Copyright Claim

Found on The Silver Tongue on Sunday, 07 November 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

The official YouTube video channel of American glam legends Kiss has been closed for breaching copyright laws - just weeks after bassist Gene Simmons controversially called for all rights breakers to be sued and jailed.

Simmons recently angered online communities by stating: "Make sure there are no incursions. Sue everybody. Be litigious. Take their homes, their cars. Don't let anybody cross that line."

Now let's see where Gene will live after the copyright owner take his home and cars.

$42 German P2P fine stark contrast to seven-figure US judgments

Found on Ars Technica on Wednesday, 03 November 2010
Browse Legal-Issues

Accused file-swapper Jammie Thomas-Rasset was yesterday hit with a $1.5 million fine for downloading and distributing tunes by Richard Marx, Journey, Def Leppard, the Goo Goo Dolls, No Doubt, and others. Each of the 24 songs at issue in the case cost her $62,500. Meanwhile, the same offense in Germany might cost you €15 ($21) a song.

The cases are certainly not identical in their details, but they nicely illustrate just how different approaches to copyright infringement can be.

Fictional numbers should never be relevant in a lawsuit. When the plaintiff cannot reliably prove how often a song has been shared, the court has to assume zero times; or once for the test download (although you might argue that downloading a song you have the copyright for is hardly copyright infringement). As for the worth of each upload: online stores sell music for $0.99 each. That's how fines should be calculated; it would be fair and the industry would suddenly have no interest in further lawsuits, putting less work onto the overloaded legal system.