Lady Gaga bans Lady Goo Goo song

Found on BBC News on Friday, 14 October 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

Lady Gaga has won an injunction at London's High Court to stop animated character Lady Goo Goo from releasing a single, its makers have said.

According to Mind Candy, an injunction was granted at London's High Court on Monday preventing it from "promoting, advertising, selling, distributing or otherwise making available to the public The Moshi Dance".

"We've had a huge amount of public support. I think this could be a worrying precedent for other parody acts and tribute bands."

In related news: Lady Gaga tries to get an injunction against Queen to stop further releases of the "Radio Gaga" song.

Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Forbidding Dissemination of Photograph of da Vinci Painting

Found on Entertainment Law Matters on Saturday, 08 October 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

A federal court recently issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting a website operator from displaying the only available photograph of a painting entitled Salvator Mundi, which was recently attributed to Italian Renaissance painter Leonardo da Vinci.

No one else has ever photographed the restored Painting and any future exhibition will prohibit photography. The copyright in the Photograph is held by SMLLC.

Prior to filing suit, SMLLC sent a cease and desist letter. Sotka replied that the image she uploaded was in the public domain: “It is most likely that [SMLLC is] not familiar with US copyright law, but should they continue with the unlawful claim to copyright of the public domain image... it would give me some satisfaction to give it away....”

According to SMLLC, the photographer had to make “countless” creative judgments that “conveyed a specific artistic impression of the Painting.”

This must be one of the most far fetched exchuses for trying to get a copyright on something that cannot be copyrighted. SMLLC also made countless groundless assumptions to make money from a picture made by da Vinci.

TSA Force Breast Cancer Patient To Submit To Patdown

Found on Techdirt on Tuesday, 04 October 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

Lori Dorn, who recently had a bilateral mastectomy, and has tissue expanders installed. She has a card that explains the details of this, and why it can set off airport security.

Of course, she did set off an alarm at JFK... and then the TSA both refused to let her show the card explaining the details, but also required her to be physically groped by the TSA -- with them loudly threatening her that she wouldn't fly otherwise.

In a separate interview with the NY Times, she notes that her breasts still hurt, and she was worried about the pain of the patdown, and that she was never offered the option of a patdown in a private area.

Simply decide not to fly and leave the airport. After that, complain to the airline about how the TSA has changed your plans about flying and that now you'll prefer going by car or train whenever possible. The TSA itself just shrugs off all complains because they do not care at all, but if the airlines are faced with enough angry customers, they will take action and put pressure on the gropers.

Guy Arrested, Threatened With 15 Years For Recording Traffic Stop In Illinois

Found on Techdirt on Friday, 30 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

With Illinois planning to appeal the Michael Allison case, in which the state wants to put Allison in jail for 75 years because he recorded an interaction with the police, it's worth pointing out that this is not the only such case in Illinois. A few people have sent over this ABC report about another guy, Louis Frobe, who was arrested and told he was facing 15 years in jail for daring to turn on his Flip cam during a traffic stop.

In this case, prosecutors eventually dropped the charges, but Frobe turned around and sued them for the arrest in the first place. The Illinois Attorney General -- who still insists there's no First Amendment right to record the police -- has said Frobe's case should be dismissed since he has no standing.

Frobe's case should not be dismissed, since there is a good chance that it will result in a sane ruling and tell cops that recording their public service is perfectly legal while threatening citizens is not.

NYPD Reportedly Targeting Photographers At Occupation Of Wall Street

Found on Gothamist on Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

Witnesses, including our own photographer, tell us that the NYPD has been specifically targeting photographers and videographers for arrest. Two protestors who were maintaining the live video feed of the protests were arrested on Saturday, the first claiming that she was detained solely because she was holding a camera.

"I was standing off to the side so I could document what was going on—you couldn't really see much from within the group," Ross says, "And he kept saying, 'You either join them or I'll arrest you.' I wasn't blocking traffic or harming anything, it was obvious it was because I was holding a camera."

It's actually a logical move. When there is no evidence, the words of the police weighs more. Of course this drastically changes when someone can show a video and prove that the officers are lying. Hopefully more people will take videos now instead of getting intimidated by excessive police force and the abuse of power.

Woman: I was arrested for sitting outside in chair

Found on Atlanta Journal-Constitution on Friday, 23 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

A physically disabled Atlanta woman says a police officer threw her to the ground and arrested her when she refused to move from her chair.

Thomas then grabbed Walker's wrist and twisted her arm, causing her to fall to the concrete, unable to get up on her own, Walker said. Another Atlanta officer helped Walker to her feet and to the back of a patrol car. An ambulance was called to transport Walker to Grady Memorial Hospital, where she received treatment for a shoulder injury sustained when she hit the ground, Grossman said.

Additionally, the review board found that during a five-month period, Thomas had made 38 arrests, 27 of which were for disorderly conduct. The total of 27 arrests for disorderly conduct was three times the amount made by two other officers that patrol the same area, during the same shift, the letter sent to Turner states.

That guy must have been bullied a lot when he was a little kid. Now that he has some power, he takes it out on those around him. By doing so, he disqualifies for being a cop and should be fired.

Citizen Ticketed For Directing Traffic After Police Fail To In South Pasadena

Found on CBS on Tuesday, 20 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

When a major traffic light in the area went out Thursday morning, Alan Ehrlich took matters into his own hands, directing traffic at Fair Oaks and Huntington avenues.

Gerrish said Ehrlich cleared up the mess in 10 minutes. After 15 minutes, South Pasadena police say they finally received a call about their newest traffic officer.

Police responded to the scene and told Ehrlich to stop and issued him a ticket, but never stepped into direct traffic themselves.

South Pasadena Police Chief Joe Payne said he did not have the man power needed to staff officers at Fair Oaks and Huntington Thursday and that is safer to allow traffic to back up.

They were probably annoyed to be interrupted while working on the cases of missing Donuts.

Rock veterans win copyright fight

Found on BBC News on Monday, 12 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

On Monday, the EU Council voted to extend the copyright on sound recordings from 50 to 70 years.

Announcing the ruling, the council of the European Union said: "Performers generally start their careers young and the current term of protection of 50 years often does not protect their performances for their entire lifetime.

"Therefore, some performers face an income gap at the end of their lifetimes."

Everybody is equal, so I want the same. I want to write a few programs and get revenues from them for the next 70 years so I don't have to work when I'm old. Or an architect who designs a public building and gets revenues for the rest of his life. Seriously, this ruling is simply stupid. If those dried-up and aging rockstars still want to be able to pay for groupies and cocaine, they have to work. Like everybody else.

Summit Entertainment Sues Guy Who Registered Twilight.com In 1994 For Trademark Infringement

Found on Techdirt on Sunday, 11 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

It has shut down fanzines, stopped a documentary about the real town where Twilight is supposed to take place, sued a fashion designer for accurately noting that one of its jackets was worn by "Bella" in Twilight, been involved in a legal battle with Bath & Bodyworks for selling a body lotion called "Twilight Woods," which had nothing to do with the movies, and pressed criminal charges against a fan who tweeted some photos from the movie set of the latest Twilight flick.

Its latest move is to sue the guy who owns Twilight.com -- which he registered in 1994, eleven years before Stephenie Meyer published the first Twilight book and thirteen years before Summit Entertainment bought the movie rights to the book.

Retards on the run. I hope the judge tells them where to shove the lawsuit they started.

9/11: The day we lost our privacy and power

Found on The Register on Saturday, 10 September 2011
Browse Legal-Issues

The catastrophe hardliners had secretly longed for was on everyone's screens, providing the justification for rafts of intrusive new surveillance measures.

Much aided and abetted by the internet giants' readily expressed contempt for privacy in the rush to monetise their customers and their customers' data, the long-term legacy of 9/11 is that new generations are being schooled to no longer see or understand why control of personal information may really matter, and why in history it does and did matter.

So far, the attacks have been a success. They put the world into a shock for 10 years now.