Rivals bid to snatch green domain

Found on BBC News on Friday, 07 August 2009
Browse Internet

Rival environmental groups are lining up supporters to try to take control of a new net domain aimed at green groups.

".eco should mean something and it should be about something more than just another domain," Trevor Bowden told BBC News.

The .eco domain has been made possible because of a relaxation on Icann's strict rules on top-level domain names.

Sweet, another TLD so spend money on. It's impact will be as massive as .name, .museum, .coop and .aero. How often did you type in one of those TLD's? So much for "mean something". Consumers are already faced with official looking seals created by companies to make their products appear more eco-friendly or healthy or whatever helps selling them. Now they can buy a .eco too. Really, I couldn't care less about that TLD.

Hackers hit Twitter and Facebook

Found on BBC News on Wednesday, 05 August 2009
Browse Internet

Twitter was taken offline for more than two hours whilst Facebook's service was "degraded", according to the firms.

For example, in January this year Twitter announced that 33 accounts had been hacked, including those belonging to US President Barack Obama and singer Britney Spears.

"With the eyes of the world's media all trained on Twitter at the moment, those behind this latest attack may be using it as a means of highlighting the vulnerability of the sites we take for granted."

And nothing of value was lost.

Want Gmail? Best have your mobile handy

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 28 July 2009
Browse Internet

Users signing up for a Gmail account are now being asked to provide a mobile-phone number in the continuing war against spam, though Google will keep it handy just in case anything else turns up.

"Your number will also be associated with your account to avoid unnecessary future verifications for other Google services", though the Do-No-Evil company does clarify: "your number will never be sold or shared for marketing purposes without your permission, nor will we contact you using this number without your express permission".

Guess that means my Gmail account will be killed once they start re-authenticating existing users like that. Not that much would be lost: three mails in five years hardly makes it an important account. At least not important enough to turn over my cellphone number (something I don't have anyway) to Google.

Plug-pulling ISP changes policy

Found on BBC News on Friday, 24 July 2009
Browse Internet

Internet service provider (ISP) Karoo, based in Hull, has changed its policy of suspending the service of users suspected of copyright violations.

"They gave me a form to sign to get reconnected," she told the BBC. "The form basically said 'if I admit my guilt you'll reconnect me'. So I didn't sign it and walked out."

No court order, no verification. Plus, it seems like they are violating wiretapping laws by snooping the traffic of their customers to find out what they are sharing. I'd assume things would look pretty bad for them if a miffed customer drags them into court.

Call for limits on web snooping

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 11 July 2009
Browse Internet

Governments and companies should limit the snooping they do on web users.

He also warned that attempts to censor what people could say or what they could do online were ultimately doomed to failure.

"The trend over the years is that the internet in the end goes around censorship and openness eventually triumphs," he said. "But it is by no means an easy road."

That's what's so nice about the Internet: you see governments trying to censor it, but their efforts are useless. The network evolves, blockings can be avoided and blocklists leak.

Major UK ISP: video streaming's "free ride" is over

Found on Ars Technica on Friday, 12 June 2009
Browse Internet

Major UK Internet provider BT opened up yesterday on the discriminatory traffic throttling it applies to streaming online video under certain plans.

That plan, called "Option 1," offers 10GB/month of data transfer, imposes throttling on P2P connections during parts of the day, throttles anyone who's a "heavy user," and places a limit of 896Kbps on video streaming services between 5pm and midnight.

But BT says it's losing millions by giving content owners "a completely free ride."

So, to sum it up, they promised people they could drive on their roads whenever they want and how much they want with cars which use the entire width of the road. Now that their customers make use of those promises, BT complains and calls it unfair. Sorry, but this is a perfect example of "shot yourself in the foot". Instead of giving customers lines their network can handle, they promised them more and more, knowing that it won't work anymore if enough start using it. What type of customer did they expect when promising unlimited and superfast broadband access? The granny next door who checks her five 10kB emails once a month? Wrong business model I guess. Or failing at upgrading network infrastructure.

Most Twitter users never tweet, don't follow anyone

Found on Ars Technica on Wednesday, 10 June 2009
Browse Internet

A new report about how the majority of the population uses Twitter reveals that most people, well... don't really use it.

According to HubSpot's analysis of Twitter's 4.5 million accounts, 54.9 percent of users have never tweeted and 52.7 have no followers whatsoever.

What's more perplexing, however, is that 55.5 percent of Twitter users don't follow anyone else.

It's more surprising that so many people are active twits. That "micro-blogging" service is one of the most useless ideas ever. What proves that the dot-com bubble still does exist.

Google eyeballs planted on 92% of top websites

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 02 June 2009
Browse Internet

A new privacy study says that Google-controlled web bugs are tracking users on 92 of the net's top 100 sites and about 88 per cent of almost 400,000 other domains.

Google Analytics was used by over 71 per cent of the domains, Google AdSense by over 35 per cent, and Google DoubleClick by over 26 per cent.

"Within the same privacy policy, we often found that a site would say 'We don't share your information with third-parties' but then elsewhere in policy they'd say 'We do permit third-party tracking via web bugs,'" Brian Carver, the professor who oversaw the study, tells The Reg. "To the average web user that's a contradiction."

I don't like being tracked at all. Advertisers like Google might think that they have a reason to monitor my behavior, but there is no reason for me to accept that. That's why domains like "pagead2.googlesyndication.com", "googlesyndication.com", "google-analytics.com" and a few more are in my hosts file and resolve to 127.0.0.1 now.

Wolfram|Alpha's Surprising Terms of Service

Found on Slashdot on Monday, 18 May 2009
Browse Internet

Wolfram|Alpha's terms of use are completely different in that it is not a search engine, it's a computational service. The legalese says that they claim copyright on the each results page and require attribution.

Groklaw notes this is interesting considering some of its results quote 2001: A Space Odyssey or Douglas Adams. Claiming copyright on that material may be a bold move.

I don't see much of a problem there: I simply decided not to use Alpha. Nobody can force you to accept some freaky ToS. So just move on. It's not like this engine is the best invention since sliced bread.

Adblock developer offers 'please unblock me' tag to sites

Found on The Register on Monday, 11 May 2009
Browse Internet

Fresh from a bizarre food fight with rival Giorgio Maone of NoScript, Adblock Plus developer Wladimir Palant has offered an olive branch to publishers - and along with it, an opportunity for his users to show that they're not a bunch of parasitic freeloaders.

His solution is based on the premise that "most users don't want to deny webmasters their income", and involves the addition of a tag to a page's source code, requesting that the user unblock ads for the particular site.

Adblock will look for this tag, check to see whether the user visits this site regularly, and then display a notification.

Oh yes, this is going to work just perfectly. Just like SMTP never was abused to deliver spam, just like the metatags never were abused to push sites up in search engines, just like marquee never was abused to annoy users with blinking text, just like window.open never was abused to flood users with pop-ups. Face it: if you give advertisers a way to deliver a message, they will abuse it.