Amazon EBS failure brings down Reddit, Imgur, others

Found on Network World on Monday, 22 October 2012
Browse Internet

AWS confirmed on its status page at 2:11 p.m. ET that it is experiencing "degraded performance for a small number of EBS volumes." It says the issue is restricted to a single Availability Zone within the US-East-1 Region, which is in Northern Virginia. It warns that instances using EBS volumes will also experience degraded performance.

AWS has periodic performance issues this year, including its last major outage in late June, which it blamed on powerful storms that ripped through the mid-Atlantic region causing power outages. Last year, AWS was down for as many as four days for some customers, including Reddit, Foursquare, Quora and HootSuite.

Shortly after confirming the EBS outages, AWS reported that its Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS), Elastic Beanstalk, which is an application deployment service and ElastiCache were also impacted by the outage.

Put everything into the cloud. The cloud makes everything fine. Never again experience downtimes in the cloud. Well, it looks like the cloud is just as reliable as your traditional hosting, or worse. The cloud is just a marketing gag; just like the .com bubble was.

Zuckerberg: In 10 years, folks will share 1,000 times what they do now

Found on Cnet News on Saturday, 20 October 2012
Browse Internet

"It's sort of a social-networking version of Moore's Law," said Zuckerberg, who was interviewed by Y Combinator co-founder Paul Graham. "We expect this rate [of sharing] will double every 10 years. So in 10 years from now, people will be sharing about 1,000 times as many things as they do today."

As for Facebook, he argued that the social network is fundamentally changing human behavior by expanding the number of people we can keep in our social circles -- offline and on.

In 10 years, nobody will remember Facebook anymore; or maybe a small group who also still uses Myspace. Of course Zucky has to be so optimistic; after all he has to tell his investors something positive.

AT&T Starts Six-Strikes Anti-Piracy Plan Next Month, Will Block Websites

Found on TorrentFreak on Monday, 15 October 2012
Browse Internet

Customers whose accounts are repeatedly flagged for alleged copyright infringements will have their access to frequently visited websites blocked, until they complete an online copyright course. It’s expected that most other participating ISPs will start their versions of the anti-piracy plan on the same date.

“The reports are made by the content owners and are of IP-addresses that are associated with copyright infringing activities. AT&T will not share any personally identifiable information about its customers with content owners until authorized by the customer or required to do so by law.”

When repeated infringers try to access certain websites they will be redirected to an educational page. To lift the blockade, AT&T will require these customers to complete an “online education tutorial on copyright”.

Accessing "certain websites" now becomes a crime for which you will be punished by your ISP and forced to go through a brainwashing "education"? Well hello censorship and 1984.

How Facebook Can Out Your Most Personal Secrets

Found on Slashdot on Sunday, 14 October 2012
Browse Internet

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Facebook revealed the sexual preferences of users despite those users have chosen 'privacy lock-down' settings on Facebook. The article describes two students who were casualties of a privacy loophole on Facebook—the fact that anyone can be added to a group by a friend without their approval.

Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes responded with a statement blaming the users: 'Our hearts go out to these young people. Their unfortunate experience reminds us that we must continue our work to empower and educate users about our robust privacy controls.'

Now it may sound harsh, but it's their own fault. Never ever trust Facebook. They want your data. It's their capital; and the past has shown more than enough times that Facebook does not care about privacy at all.

Facebook confirms researcher exploited privacy settings to quickly collect user phone numbers

Found on The Next Web on Thursday, 11 October 2012
Browse Internet

On Friday, a researcher by the name of Suriya Prakash claimed that the majority of phone numbers on Facebook are not safe.

Suriya decide to write a simple script that read and saved the user names for a range of generated phone numbers. Facebook of course limits the number of times you can search on the site, but Suriya claims he bypassed this all by simply using the mobile site, which he argues doesn’t do this (Facebook says otherwise).

Every time I read about privacy issues at Facebook, I wonder what people expect. Clearly, the biggest privacy issue is Facebook itself.

Think tank's website rejects browser do-not-track requests

Found on Network World on Sunday, 30 September 2012
Browse Internet

The website for the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) now tells visitors it will not honor their browsers' do-not-track requests as a form of protest against the technology pushed by privacy groups and parts of the U.S. government.

Behavioral advertising, which tracks Web users in order to deliver relevant advertising to them, is a service in which "everyone wins," he added. "Ad-supported websites increase their revenue, users receive fewer irrelevant ads and more free content, and advertisers get to be in front of their target audiences."

Unfortunately, I don't want to "win". I won't buy some product just because an ad popped up on my screen for it; actually, it's the oppostite: I avoid products which are advertised. So while the ITIF is free to ignore DNT requests, I'm equally free to use Ghostery, Adblock, reject 3rd party cookies and flush my browser cache every time I close it. DNT was not created to annoy advertisers, but because tracking got so much out of control that users want to do something about it.

Why Do Not Track is worse than a miserable failure

Found on ZDnet on Sunday, 23 September 2012
Browse Internet

Two big associations, the Interactive Advertising Bureau and the Digital Advertising Alliance, represent 90% of advertisers. Downey says those big groups have devised their own interpretation of Do Not Track. When the servers controlled by those big companies encounter a DNT=1 header, says Downey, "They have said they will stop serving targeted ads but will still collect and store and monetize data.”

In the real world, Do Not Track is a cruel joke. The companies that are collecting and storing information about you will use their support of the standard for PR purposes and then ignore its intent.

That was pretty much obvious right from the start. Data collectors have no reason to respect the DNT header, and they won't because it would stop them from gathering the user data which they sell. You might as well try to introduce a "Do Not Spam" header; I'm sure it will have the same results and not affect the amount of spam you'll receive in any way.

Facebook bends to Europe's will, disables facial recognition (for now)

Found on Ars Technica on Friday, 21 September 2012
Browse Internet

Facebook has come under fire in the EU for using facial recognition software to identify the people in users' photos and suggest friends to tag in those photos.

Facebook isn't giving up on facial recognition in the EU forever. In a statement sent to TechCrunch, it said, "It’s worth us reiterating that once we have agreed [on] an approach on the best way to notify and educate users with the DPC, we hope to bring back this useful tool."

Just make the feature an opt-in and let the user decide. Facebook has that ugly characteristic to enable every new feature per default for everybody, messing with the settings of the users. Almost always, this means less privacy.

Europe hits old internet address limits

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 15 September 2012
Browse Internet

From now on, companies can only make one more application for IPv4 addresses and, if successful, will only get 1,024 of them.

On 14 September Ripe NCC got down to its last 16 million IPv4 addresses. While this might sound a lot, said Mr Pawlik, the use of this last substantial block would be so heavily restricted that the supply could be considered to be at an end.

Other techniques based around technical tricks that share IPv4 addresses among many different devices would prove increasingly unworkable, he said.

Or the RIPE could demand some address blocks back from those who already do have millions, instead of bugging many medium and small IT companies. The DoD alone manages eleven /8 netblocks, or 184,549,376 IP addresses. AT&T and Level3 have also two /8 blocks each. There's also the question why other companies have entire /8 blocks, like Bell, Daimler, DuPont, Eli Lilly, Ford, GE, Halliburton, HP, Prudential Securities and Xerox. If those handful clean up and shrink their address spaces, IPv4 could easily last for many more years.

GoDaddy hosted websites down 'in possible hack attack'

Found on BBC News on Monday, 10 September 2012
Browse Internet

Thousands of websites hosted by one of the world's biggest internet domain registrars and web hosts, GoDaddy, were reported down on Monday.

"If it is true, then that has not been constructed to scale up in a sisable DDos. The GoDaddy site can cope with a sizable amount of traffic, but its DNS may not have been.

One would think that they have a more robust DNS system in place.