Wiretapping Law Sparks Rage In Sweden

Found on Slashdot on Monday, 16 June 2008
Browse Internet

This Wednesday at 9am the Swedish Parliament is voting on a new wiretapping law which would enable the civil agency (FRA - Defense Radio Agency) to snoop on all traffic crossing the Swedish border. E-mail, fax, telephone, web, SMS, etc. 24/7 without any requirement to obtain a court order.

Nonetheless, the ruling party block is supposedly pressuring its members to vote 'yes' to this new proposed law with threats to unseat any dissidents. After massive activity on blogs by ordinary citizens, and street protests, the story has finally been picked up by major Swedish news sources. The result will likely be huge street protests on Wednesday.

Say goodbye to freedom and hello to encryption. However, I wonder if this law will work as planned, considering that due to the routing nature of the Internet, nobody really knows which routes his traffic takes. So it may very well run through Sweden; in the end, they'd be spying on citizens of other nations and I'm not sure of those nations will be too happy (if citizens make their governments act on this). The funny thing is that those who should be monitored, e.g. terrorists and the organized crime, will simply nullify those efforts by using strong encryption (or, even more embarrassing for the FRA, by using old school mail).

AVG scanner blasts internet with fake traffic

Found on The Register on Saturday, 14 June 2008
Browse Internet

AVG rolled Linkscanner into its anti-virus engine, which has about 70 million active users worldwide. The company estimates that 20 million machines have upgraded to the tool's new incarnation, AVG version 8, and this has already cooked up enough ghost clicks to skew traffic not only on The Reg but any number of other sites as well.

Webmasters deal with robot traffic and other rogue visits all the time. But this is a little different. In an effort to fool even the sneakiest malware exploits, Linkscanner does its best to imitate real user clicks - which means most webmasters are completely unaware of the problem.

This also sounds like a solution for the Phorm profiling. But in the end, it would make more sense if search engines did issue the warnings. After all, some people do want to visit dubious sites.

Verizon, Time Warner Cable, and Sprint to Block Usenet

Found on Webmonkey on Tuesday, 10 June 2008
Browse Internet

New York's Attorney General has just launched a blacklist-based initiative to quell undesirable Internet content. Child pornography is the target, although like all blacklists there will be a large number of blocked innocents and civilian casualties.

An undercover investigation by the Attorney General's office uncovered a major source of online child pornography known as "Newsgroups," an online service not associated with websites. The Newsgroups act as online public bulletin boards where users can upload and download files. Users access Newsgroups through their Internet Service Providers.

According to a report by Declan McCullagh, Sprint will be blocking the entire alt. hierarchy of Usenet, while good old Time Warner Cable has no time for such fussiness and will just stop offering all Usenet access.

I can't hear that stupidity anymore. Sure, go ahead, use all your resources to block the access to childporn instead of trying to curb its creation. I bet the kids will be so happy. But what can you expect from someone who already fails at the basics? "Newsgroups" are not some unbelieveable hidden pool of illegal activity; this amazing "investigation" should have figured out that newsgroups are as old (if not older) than the World Wide Web. Or the "Internet" as they call it; as if the Internet is nothing but the WWW. Users can up- and download files via e-mail too. What's next? Shutting down e-mail (well, at least that would stop spam)? That shows clearly that you never ever should let someone work on something he doesn't understand at all. And it will take ages until they realize that this will do nothing; pedophiles will move to other ways of distribution. But oh joy, let's use the childporn argument to axe everything because nobody dares to speak up against it without being labeled as a pedophile.

Metallica Kills Early Reviews of Upcoming Album

Found on Wired on Sunday, 08 June 2008
Browse Internet

The band seemed to have learned somewhat from the dark days of the Napster debacle by offering fans online access to pre-release material and in-studio video footage, but now it has apparently unleashed another potentially damaging fiasco upon itself by forcing bloggers to take down reviews of their upcoming album.

Metallica representatives played the album for The Quietus contributor "Bob Mulhouse" in London last Wednesday, after he did what one would expect: he posted a review on his blog.

Metallica held a listening party for music reviewers and was surprised when some of them wrote reviews? That has to be a public relations first.

It's still unclear why Metallica's management didn't require the reviewers to sign non-disclosure agreements if they didn't want them to write about it.

Ok, it might be understandable if a band wants negative reviews removed (good luck). Removing postive reviews is just dumb. But then, that could be an attempt of being sneaky and cunning by trying to use the Streisand Effect for PR purposes. However, I won't get anything from them; not only isn't it my genre, and since Napster I couldn't care less about them. Even though I never used Napster, it kicked off all the current lawsuit problems against P2P.

Call to prosecute BT for ad trial

Found on BBC News on Friday, 06 June 2008
Browse Internet

BT should face prosecution for its "illegal" trials of a controversial ad-serving technology, a leading computer security researcher has said.

But BT plans to push ahead with a further trial of the technology later this summer, the BBC has learnt.

During the trials adverts were stripped out of web pages served up to BT customers and replaced with more targeted ads, if available.

"This isn't how we expect ISPs to treat their customers' private communications and since, not surprisingly, it's against the law of the land, we must now expect to see a prosecution."

Phorm needs to be stopped as soon as possible. They try to make money by using the work of others. I wonder how long a company would succeed in sending employees to stores, stick ads on all the CD-cover and leave.

Most Comcast Web service to top 100 Mbps by 2010

Found on Physorg on Thursday, 05 June 2008
Browse Internet

Comcast Corp. said Thursday that by early 2010 it plans to offer consumers in most of its markets Internet service so fast they will be able to download a high-definition movie in minutes.

Among cable operators, Comcast has been one of the most aggressive in deploying a wideband technology called Docsis 3.0 to fend off competitors as more users download videos over the Internet.

Except they won't let you. Given Comcasts history in user control it's hard to believe that in 2 years, they will happy let you do what you want on their network. At the same time they accounced this, Comcast tests new throttling technology to limit your online experience. They call it "enhancing the experience for everybody" when they really limit yours. You will have a 100Mbps connection (probably advertised as unlimited), but if you use it too much, Comcast will throttle you. There's no reason to believe that they will drop their hate towards P2P applications anytime soon; and to look at some websites I don't need that connection.

Covert BT Phorm Trial Report Leaked

Found on Slashdot on Wednesday, 04 June 2008
Browse Internet

An internal BT report on the BT secret trials of Phorm (aka 121Media) Deep Packet Inspection has been revealed on Wikileaks today. The leaked document shows that during the covert trial a possible 18 million page requests were intercepted and injected with JavaScript and about 128 thousand charity ads were substituted with the Phorm Ad Network advertisements purchased by advertisers specifically for the covert trial period.

Slamming charity ads in order to inject your own ads to make money? Now that's what I call morally dead. I hope the guys behind Phorm end up needing help from charities without getting any because some shady advertiser drains their money away.

MediaDefender Defends Revision3 SYN Attack

Found on Wired on Saturday, 31 May 2008
Browse Internet

MediaDefender is paid by the recording and motion picture industries to seed fake files to illicit torrent tracking services. When Revision3 closed the tracker during the holiday weekend, the result was a denial of service attack by MediaDefender, which had been seeding the tracker with fake torrents.

"That's when MediaDefender went into overdrive and started pummeling us," Louderback said. "If a tracker was previously open and suddenly shut, their systems are automatically configured to put them out of business."

Saaf said MediaDefender had been seeding the tracker with fake torrents for some time. Fake files corrupt BitTorrent downloads.

So, to sum it up, Randy Saaf, Media Defender's CEO, admitted openly that his company abuses systems belonging to others which have found to be exploitable to upload fake files trying to destroy downloads of other people. And if someone decides not to let them hijack their systems for this dirty work, Media Defender simply launches a denial of service attack to bring those systems down. That's like someone using your car to smuggle drugs across the border and when you suddenly keep your car locked, they throttle you. Seriously, Saaf should not be allowed to use illegal means, namely unauthorized access and denial of service, for his business. If you do something like that, feds will kick in your door at 3:48am and lock you up. Obviously, working for the media industry can buy you protection from legal forces.

MediaDefender's Denial Of Service Attack On Revision3

Found on Techdirt on Wednesday, 28 May 2008
Browse Internet

The company has also been accused of a variety of different denial of service attacks against sites it believes are promoting file sharing. On the whole, pretty much everything the company seems to be associated with would be considered dirty tactics. What's amazing is that in pulling all these dirty tricks, MediaDefender never seems to get in much trouble for it.

MediaDefender, however, used a backdoor into Revision3's BitTorrent tracker to inject its own nefarious torrents -- basically piggybacking off of Revision3's tracker. Revision3 noticed the backdoor and closed it -- at which point, MediaDefender's system started flooding Revision3's servers with over 8,000 pings per second.

It's always been baffling: MediaDefender, a company that claims to protect "illegal" filesharing, makes extensive use of backdoors to poison networks; and if someone closes said backdoor, MediaDefender's network, of course accidentally, brings down the site. What a nice example of "fight illegal activity with illegal activity".

Your Web activity, logged and loaded

Found on CNet News on Wednesday, 14 May 2008
Browse Internet

Charter Communications is planning to monitor its customers' Web surfing and then, anonymously, display relevant advertisements.

Schremp confirmed that Charter is using technology from Redwood City, Calif.-based NebuAd--which is reminiscent of how British broadband providers have been working with Phorm, which uses deep packet inspection with "anonymized ISP data to deliver the right ad to the right person at the right time."

"The enhanced advertising solution does not utilize deep packet inspection. It looks at URL level information only. That's another point of misinformation on the Net."

Schremp wants to make customers accept a technology even he doesn't understand completely. If you want to know what URL someone is visiting, you have to take apart the sent packet and look at its content; that's Deep Packet Inspection. And since you do not know which packets contain URLs, you have to look into each and every packet. At this point, it would be trivial to look for other information too. It would also be interesting to know what the other side ion the browser thinks of that. Webmasters place ads on their sites to earn money and now an ISP replaces them, effectively stealing their cash. Or, even worse, ad-free sites are plastered with "targeted ads". If I want something, I'll look for it; and I sure won't buy anything just because a flashy animation is slapped at me.